oauth-2.0

问题 I have built a GSM add on and published it for my domain. I built the code, on Google Apps Script and set it up in Google API Console. I installed it for my domain, but it does not show the card in Gmail It should show in the sidebar, and in the compose window. It works fine when I install the head version from within google apps script, but then I publish it to GSM for users in my organization it doesn't work. The purpose of the addon is to collect information from fields in a card and use

问题 My project uses redis session with springboot session and spring security 5.1.10 . I just migrated the old oauth2 implementation. Before, when I restarted the app I still had the access_token and refresh_token. With this implementation the user is logged in, but I loose the AuthorizedClients so loadAuthorizedClient function returns null after restarting. Also in production we have many containers with the same app. Is there any springboot stardard way to achieve this? like register some bean

问题 My project uses redis session with springboot session and spring security 5.1.10 . I just migrated the old oauth2 implementation. Before, when I restarted the app I still had the access_token and refresh_token. With this implementation the user is logged in, but I loose the AuthorizedClients so loadAuthorizedClient function returns null after restarting. Also in production we have many containers with the same app. Is there any springboot stardard way to achieve this? like register some bean

问题 I'm implementing OAuth2 authorization using Spring Boot. I have already Authorization Server and Resource Server, now I want to access resources from Resource Server using client_credentials grant type. I'm little confused about it, because in Resource Server I have to add client_id and client_secret . But why Resource Server really need it? As I understand this concept client should get from Authorization Server using client credentials his access token. And then send this access token to

问题 I'm implementing OAuth2 authorization using Spring Boot. I have already Authorization Server and Resource Server, now I want to access resources from Resource Server using client_credentials grant type. I'm little confused about it, because in Resource Server I have to add client_id and client_secret . But why Resource Server really need it? As I understand this concept client should get from Authorization Server using client credentials his access token. And then send this access token to

问题 I'm implementing OAuth2 authorization using Spring Boot. I have already Authorization Server and Resource Server, now I want to access resources from Resource Server using client_credentials grant type. I'm little confused about it, because in Resource Server I have to add client_id and client_secret . But why Resource Server really need it? As I understand this concept client should get from Authorization Server using client credentials his access token. And then send this access token to

问题 I understand that Google OAuth2 scopes broadly fit into three buckets, ordered from most difficult to be approved to use, to least: Restricted Scopes Sensitive Scopes everything else I found a list of Restricted Scopes, here: https://support.google.com/cloud/answer/9110914?hl=en I am unable to find a list of Sensitive Scopes. All of the Google pages i've seen simply explain what happens if you request a sensitive scope, or how to go about review if you are using a sensitive scope. Fine, but

问题 I have several microservices(Springboot) which I have hosted on AWS. For example Lets assume Service1 and Service2 are two micro services. Service1 is the microservice which is accessed by frontend and mobile app. Service1 calls Service2. Service2 is completely internal. I have setup Amazon API Gateway which sits infront of Service1. And I have Authentication(Oauth) configured using cognito. All this is working. When calling from frontend/app, the request needs to be authenticated with the

问题 I'm just curious - do I need to keep the client_secret from Google/FaceBook/another OAuth 2.0 providers in a 'secret' place? As far as I can see, there're very little things that could be done with client-secret parameter, as soon as I specify very restrictive callback-urls. So is it safe, for instance, to commit 'secret' keys to github/bitbucket/etc as a public repository for some live web-project? As far as I know, client-secret has nothing in common with the developer account on google

问题 I'm just curious - do I need to keep the client_secret from Google/FaceBook/another OAuth 2.0 providers in a 'secret' place? As far as I can see, there're very little things that could be done with client-secret parameter, as soon as I specify very restrictive callback-urls. So is it safe, for instance, to commit 'secret' keys to github/bitbucket/etc as a public repository for some live web-project? As far as I know, client-secret has nothing in common with the developer account on google