notation

问题 How am I able to prevent jQuery from using scientific notation - 1.2e+07 instead of 12,000,000 within the jQuery.animate() function? Using: $('body').css({ backgroundPositionX: 12000000 + 'px' }); Converts to: background-position-x: 1.2e+07px; Desired results: background-position-x: 12000000px; This starts occuring as soon as the number hits 1 million (1,000,000): This, in turn, causes my application to behave strangely. I want pure, simple integer numbers -- none of this scientific nonsense!

问题 I have some code which needs to do things based on a schedule: e.g. during business hours do X, after hours do Y. The schedule will be defined by our customer's so I need a notation which can be written by people and parsed by my program. I'm thinking of something like: 12/25:0730-1730 Do Y [Mo-Fr]:0730-1730 Do X [Mo-Tu]:1730-0730 Do Y Fr:1730-Mo:0730 Do Y There will definitely be weekly variation. Yearly variation (holidays) seems likely. I would like a notation that is efficient and

问题 I'd like, in Coqide, to have the proof state not use a certain notation (but still use all others). Is this possible? 回答1: From what I understand in the documentation, it is not possible. You might be able to play with opening/closing scopes but I'm not sure it will work, since it is stated explicitly that notations will be used for printing whenever possible. 回答2: Some tricks that might be sufficient are described here: How to disable my custom notation in Coq? I wanted to add pointer to

问题 This is a very general computer science based question, but one that doesn't seem intuitive based on the literature about how they work. It's a language agnostic question, but relates to how a Set data type works internally. I have used them many times, and it is recommended to use them to store unique values and quickly access them. Supposedly in Big-O notation its time and complexity is O(1) every time the Set is accessed. How is that possibly if the Set may contain thousands of items? Even

问题 This is my object : Customer{"id": "0001", "name": "ivan" , "country" {"city" : "Peru"}} So: Whats the correct form to use brakets? the context is in a jquery each: $. each (datos, function (index, data) { } 1° data["country"["city"]] >> the result should be "Peru" 2° data["country"]["city"] >> the result should be "Peru" or whats is the form correct? 回答1: I belive you are saying that your object is : Customer = { id: "0001", name: "ivan", country: { city : "Peru" } } In this case your syntax

问题 I'm trying to figure out the runtime of an algorithm. It is a sort which works by dividing the problem up into sets of 2/3's (it's the CLR sort). I'm having some trouble coming up with it, this is what I have: T(n)=3T([2n]/3)+1 (the 1 is because aside from the recursive calls, there is one exchange which may or may not be made. Assuming it is done, it is still only a constant cost.) T(n)=3T([2([2n]/3+1)]/3+1)+1 T(n)=3T([2([2([2n]/3+1)]/3+1)]/3+1)+1 T(n)=3T([2([2([2([2n]/3+1)]/3+1)]/3+1)]/3+1)

问题 I got stuck with this two codes. Code 1 int f(int n){ if (n <= 1){ return 1; } return f(n-1) + f(n-1); } Code 2 (Balanced binary search tree) int sum(Node node){ if(node == null){ return 0; } return sum(node.left) + node.value + sum(node.right); } the author says the runtime of Code 1 is O(2^n) and space complexity is O(n) And Code 2 is O(N) I have no idea what's different between those two codes. it looks like both are the same binary trees 回答1: Well there's a mistake because the first

问题 I'm going to rely on the saying that no question is a dumb question, but I have a slightly dumb one to ask. EDIT: Seems that this question has been asked and answered a few times on here already, though using titles I didn't come across when searching for duplicates. Here are some related posts: Double to string conversion without scientific notation How to convert double to string without the power to 10 representation (E-05) Place with an answer (Jon Skeet): http://www.yoda.arachsys.com

问题 I got this plot using the code below In my plot, I want the NO3 to have negative sign"-" as superscript like below In the label of x axis, I couldn't use negative sign only as a superscript to NO3 so I had to use -1 as shown below x <- seq(0,2*pi,0.1) y <- sin(x) df <- data.frame(x, y) ggplot(df, aes(x=x, y=y))+ geom_point(size=4)+ labs(x=expression(Production~rate~" "~mu~moles~NO[3]^{-1}-N~Kg^{-1}), y=expression(Concentration~mg~L^{-1})) Any suggestions on how to change the label to have a

问题 It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center. Closed 7 years ago . I would like to evaluate(not convert) infix expression in C++. If you posses algorithm or even implementation of such algorithm(may be not C++, any language... I will try to rewrite it to C++) share please.