multimap

using boost multi_index_container to preserve insertion order

我与影子孤独终老i 提交于 2019-11-28 04:12:08
问题 I initially started out using a std::multimap to store many values with the same key, but then I discovered that it doesn't preserve the insertion order among values with the same key. This answer claims it can be done with boost::multi_index::multi_index_container , but gives no example. Looking through the docs, there are no examples of that usage, and I can't make heads or tails of how you're supposed to use this thing. I have come to expect poor documentation from the lesser-used boost

Multi-valued hashtable in Java

允我心安 提交于 2019-11-27 23:28:15
Is it possible to have multiple values for the same key in a hash table? If not, can you suggest any such class or interface which could be used? No. That's kind of the idea of hash tables. However, you could either roll your own with a Map<YourKeyObject, List<YourValueObject>> and some utility methods for creating the list if it's not present, or use something like the Multimap from Google Collections . Example: String key = "hello"; Multimap<String, Integer> myMap = HashMultimap.create(); myMap.put(key, 1); myMap.put(key, 5000); System.out.println(myMap.get(key)); // prints either "[1, 5000]

How is the C++ multimap container implemented?

我的梦境 提交于 2019-11-27 20:34:10
For example a C++ vector is implemented using a dynamic array where each element uses consecutive memory spaces. I know that a C++ multimap is a one to many relationship but what is the internal structure? The C++ standard does not define how the standard containers should be implemented, it only gives certain constraints like the one you say for vectors. multimaps have certain runtime complexity (O(lg n) for the interesting operations) and other guarantees, and can be implemented as red-black trees . This is how they are implemented in the GNU standard C++ library. Oliver Charlesworth Very

Using boost::iostreams::mapped_file_source with std::multimap

本小妞迷上赌 提交于 2019-11-27 15:54:44
I have a rather large amount of data to analyse - each file is about 5gigs. Each file is of the following format: xxxxx yyyyy Both key and value can repeat, but the keys are sorted in increasing order. I'm trying to use a memory mapped file for this purpose and then find the required keys and work with them. This is what I've written: if (data_file != "") { clock_start = clock(); data_file_mapped.open(data_file); data_multimap = (std::multimap<double, unsigned int> *)data_file_mapped.data(); if (data_multimap != NULL) { std::multimap<double, unsigned int>::iterator it = data_multimap->find

how does the stl's multimap insert respect orderings?

馋奶兔 提交于 2019-11-27 15:28:40
I have some data which come with a integer index. I am continuous generating new data which needs to added to the collection of data I have, sorted by that index, at the same time I want to easily be able to go the start of the data and iterate through it. This sounds like std::multimap is just what I need. However, I also need data with the same index to be kept in the order in which it was inserted, in this case meaning that when I iterate through the data I get to the earlier data before the later data. Does multimap do this? I haven't found any guarantees that this is the case. In the sgi

How to create a Multimap<K,V> from a Map<K, Collection<V>>?

旧街凉风 提交于 2019-11-27 13:01:56
I didn't find such a multimap construction... When I want to do this, I iterate over the map, and populate the multimap. Is there an other way? final Map<String, Collection<String>> map = ImmutableMap.<String, Collection<String>>of( "1", Arrays.asList("a", "b", "c", "c")); System.out.println(Multimaps.forMap(map)); final Multimap<String, String> expected = ArrayListMultimap.create(); for (Map.Entry<String, Collection<String>> entry : map.entrySet()) { expected.putAll(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue()); } System.out.println(expected); The first result is {1=[[a, b, c, c]]} but I expect {1=[a, b,

High-performance Concurrent MultiMap Java/Scala

笑着哭i 提交于 2019-11-27 09:26:24
问题 I am looking for a high-performance, concurrent, MultiMap. I have searched everywhere but I simply cannot find a solution that uses the same approach as ConcurrentHashMap (Only locking a segment of the hash array). The multimap will be both read, added to and removed from often. The multimap key will be a String and it's value will be arbitrary. I need O(1) to find all values for a given key, O(N) is OK for removal, but O(logN) would be preferred. It is crucial that removal of the last value

is there an iterator across unique keys in a std::multimap?

Deadly 提交于 2019-11-27 04:44:29
Is there a simple or standard way to have a multimap iterator which iterate across unique keys in a multimap? i.e. for a set that looks like: {1, "a"}, {1, "lemon"}, {2, "peacock"}, {3, "angel"} an iterator which would start at {1, "a"} then incrementing would point to {2, "peacock"} and then incrementing again would point to {3, "angel"} ? Pablo You can use upper_bound to increment the iterator position instead of ++ : #include <map> #include <string> #include <iostream> using namespace std; int main() { multimap<int,string> mm; mm.insert(make_pair(1, "a")); mm.insert(make_pair(1, "lemon"));

What's the difference between std::multimap<key, value> and std::map<key, std::set<value> >

本小妞迷上赌 提交于 2019-11-27 00:25:11
问题 I found that they have one key and multiple values which is unique. 回答1: The multimap stores pairs of (key, value) where both key and value can appear several times. The map<key, set<value>> will only store each value once for a specific key. To do that, it will have to be able to compare the values, not just the keys. It depends on your application if the values that compare equal are equivalent, or if you wish to store them separately anyway. Perhaps they contain fields that are different

How is the C++ multimap container implemented?

↘锁芯ラ 提交于 2019-11-26 20:23:41
问题 For example a C++ vector is implemented using a dynamic array where each element uses consecutive memory spaces. I know that a C++ multimap is a one to many relationship but what is the internal structure? 回答1: The C++ standard does not define how the standard containers should be implemented, it only gives certain constraints like the one you say for vectors. multimaps have certain runtime complexity (O(lg n) for the interesting operations) and other guarantees, and can be implemented as red