multi-tenant

We are looking for a way of automatically filtering all CRUD operations by a tenant ID in Entity Framework. The ideas we thought of were: Using table valued user defined functions Using stored procedures (but we don't really want to, as we're using an ORM to avoid doing so) Some how modifying the templates used to generate the SQL to add a where clause on each statement. Some how modifying the templates used to generate the LINQ in the controllers (we may use MVC). Any tips? -thanks Alex. Using table valued user defined functions Table valued function are only available in .NET 4.5 Beta (and

I'm using Devise for authentication in my Rails 3 app. The application uses PostgreSQL schemas and the Apartment gem to facilitate multi-tenancy. Logging in and out of a specific subdomain is working great after an account is created. Users can only login on the subdomain for their specific account, which is great. Here's where I'm running into issues... A brand new user hits the sign up URL at: http://foo.com/signup By default, when they click submit, the new account is created, but the user is sent to: http://foo.com/dashboard Instead, I want them to go to: http://myaccount.foo.com/dashboard

I have a multi-tenant application in ASP.NET MVC. The instance of the application that will be served is function of the hostname alone (something along the lines of stackexchange, I suppose). Each instance of the application might have a different culture setting (even "auto", to read the browser's language and try to use it), and will be localized accordingly. In this situation, I'd like to do some output caching on some of my actions. So, my questions are: What are the possibilities to achieve output caching of a multi-tenant ASP.NET MVC application, if the output depends exclusively on the

Can anyone say are there any practical limits for the number of collections in mongodb? They write here https://docs.mongodb.com/manual/core/data-model-operations/#large-number-of-collections : Generally, having a large number of collections has no significant performance penalty, and results in very good performance. But for some reason mongodb set limit 24000 for the number of namespaces in the database, it looks like it can be increased, but I wonder why it has some the limit in default configuration if having many collections in the database doesn't cause any performance penalty? Does it

I've seen SaaS applications hosted in many different ways. Is it a good idea to split features and modules across multiple databases? For example, putting things like the User table on one DB and feature/app specific tables on another DB and perhaps other commonly shared tables in another DB? Start with one database. Split data/functionality when project requires it. Here is what we can learn from LinkedIn: A single database does not work Referential integrity will not be possible Any data loss is a problem Caching is good even when it's modestly effective Never underestimate growth trajectory

I am in the process of creating a Multi-Tenant asp.net application. I am deciding between separate MSSQL databases or schemas. However, I cannot find any information on how I can change the database (ideally) or user account dynamically, depending on which one the user should connect to. I will most likely have a Base Table which defines which database the user should connect to. Doing this using Linq to SQL is easy but I am not using Linq everywhere because the tables are quite dynamic and the schema is like to change very often. What is the best method of doing this? I am happy to look at

Currently working on a project where my Spring Boot project needs to leverage multiple data sources or schema in the same DB server. I have found several tutorials that teach multiple data source configuration in spring boot where entity foo exists in DataSource A and bar exists in DataSource B namely below., https://scattercode.co.uk/2016/01/05/multiple-databases-with-spring-boot- and-spring-data-jpa/ https://scattercode.co.uk/2013/11/18/spring-data-multiple-databases/ https://medium.com/@joeclever/using-multiple-datasources-with-spring-boot-and-spring-data-6430b00c02e7 But my use case is

I have an IDP (Identity Server 4) hosted with multiple bindings: auth.company1.com and auth.company2.com I also have an API protected from that IDP. So in order to access the API I need to get the access token from the IDP. This is configured at startup class at the API level like this: services.AddAuthentication("Bearer") .AddIdentityServerAuthentication(options => { options.Authority = "https://auth.company1.com/"; options.RequireHttpsMetadata = true; options.ApiName = "atb_api"; }); How can I configure options.Authority dynamically so it allows authority from multiple domains https://auth

Our app has a requirement to support multi-tenancy. Each of the boarded customer might potentially override 1 or more beans or some properties of a bean defined at the core platform level (common code/definitions). I am wondering what is the best way to handle this. skaffman Spring allows you to redefine the same bean name multiple times, and takes the last bean definition processed for a given name to be the one that wins. So for example, your could have an XML file defining your core beans, and import that in a client-specific XML file, which also redefines some of those beans. It's a bit