msmq

Disadvantages of SQL Server Service Broker [closed]

爱⌒轻易说出口 提交于 2019-11-30 02:20:24
I have been doing r&d for the scope of SQL Server Service Broker to replace current messaging solution MSMQ. I want to know disadvantages of SQL Server Service Broker in contrast to MSMQ for following criteria. Development Troubleshooting Performance (let's say we need to process 100,000 messages daily, having avg size around 25 KB) Scalability I've used Service Broker in my current project, having previously used MSMQ (brokered by MassTransit ) with great success. I was initially dubious about using Service Broker, but I have to admit it has performed very well. If you're using the Publish /

MSMQ v Database Table

人盡茶涼 提交于 2019-11-29 23:02:48
An existing process changes the status field of a booking record in a table, in response to user input. I have another process to write, that will run asynchronously for records with a particular status. It will read the table record, perform some operations (including calls to third party web services), and update the record's status field to indicate that processing is completed (or In Error, with an error count). This operation sounds very similar to a queue. What are the benefits and tradeoffs of using MSMQ over a SQL Table in this situation, and why should I choose one over the other? It

Queue alternatives to MSMQ on Windows? [closed]

↘锁芯ラ 提交于 2019-11-29 20:56:53
If you want to use a queuing product for durable messaging under Windows, running .NET 2.0 and above, which alternatives to MSMQ exist today? I know of ActiveMQ ( http://activemq.apache.org/ ), and I've seen references to WSMQ (pointing to http://wsmq.net ), but the site seems to be down. Are there any other alternatives? I can't begin to say enough good things about Tibco EMS - an implementation of the Java JMS messaging spec. Tibco EMS has superb support for .NET clients - including Compact Framework .NET on WinCE. (They also have C client libraries too.) So if you're building a

Using Windows Services to process MSMQ messages via WCF

試著忘記壹切 提交于 2019-11-29 15:46:36
问题 We have a solution where we are picking the messages using Windows Service. The Windows Service fires every after 2 minutes and retrieves the MSMQ message to pass it to a Web Service. Can I create a WCF service which will automatically picks up the messages from MSMQ Queue? Can I avoid Windows Service by using WCF Service if it support auto invocation? 回答1: Q1: you can automatically pick up messages from MSMQ, you will need to look into the netmsmqbinding, there are some design considerations

Getting Message by priority from MSMQ

与世无争的帅哥 提交于 2019-11-29 14:13:19
问题 i am sending messages in MSMQ by setting its priority. using C# can i get the message from MSMQ having high priority first? just like we get in Priority Queue. and one thing more.. suppose there are three priority level 0 - high 1- medium 2 - low the sequence in queue is 2001122221111100 now if i send message with high priority(0) where it will be placed?? by setting priority in MSMQ. will it behave like actual Priority Queue? 回答1: MSMQ does support priority queuing of messages, however

MSMQ messages received but not delivered Windows 2008 R2

寵の児 提交于 2019-11-29 11:07:25
I have a transactional queue called myPrivateTransactionalQueue hosted on a Win2008R2 server called myReceivingServer which should receive messages from another server called mySendingServer. When the mySendingServer sends a message, an entry appears in the MSMQ log on mySendingServer which says: Message with ID {f748cc48-8017-4a64-9ff6-61c68564445f}\56008 was sent to queue DIRECT=OS:<myReceivingServerName >\private$\<myPrivateTransactionalQueue> However, myReceivingServer, in the MSMQ log there is a single entry: Message came over network However the message is not being delivered to

Is decoupling web and database tiers via MSMQ necessary or overkill?

做~自己de王妃 提交于 2019-11-29 09:30:25
问题 I'm putting together a simple asp.net web control, that as the result of an ajax form post inserts a record into a MSQL database. It's possible that the page containing this control will recieve many thousands of hits in a small space of time and I'm worried about the performance issue of opening a database connection, inserting the record and then closing the connection for each request. A solution that has occured to me is to make the web control place a message into an MSMQ queue and have

交易式MSMQ

吃可爱长大的小学妹 提交于 2019-11-29 06:11:05
利用事务式MSMQ来检查消息队列是否有成功发送,才将该消息队列删除,否则不删除并回复。 最近工作时要写MSMQ,需要利用事务式MSMQ来检查消息队列是否有成功发送,才将该消息队列删除,否则不删除并回复。 在此作纪录 参考程序如下: using (TransactionScope scope = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required)) { /* 其它Code */ MessageQueue queue = new MessageQueue(privateName, QueueAccessMode.SendAndReceive); message = queue.Receive(new TimeSpan(0), MessageQueueTransactionType.Automatic); /* 其它Code */ } 原文: 大专栏 交易式MSMQ 来源: https://www.cnblogs.com/chinatrump/p/11458452.html

Why does MSMQ think I'm on a workgroup computer?

自作多情 提交于 2019-11-29 03:06:13
My computer is connected to a domain, but when I go to create a public queue: MessageQueue.Create(@".\testqueue"); I get this error: A workgroup installation computer does not support the operation. Why might MSMQ think I'm on a workgroup computer? John Breakwell Being part of a domain is a pre-cursor for installing MSMQ in AD-integrated mode. It doesn't guarantee MSMQ IS installed in AD-integrated mode. MSMQ will install in workgroup mode if: AD integration was not selected as a setup option AD integration was selected but failed to initialise; check event logs Yes, the workgroup name is

Key Benefits of MSMQ

百般思念 提交于 2019-11-29 02:57:38
问题 I have seen many socket application in which there is use of MSMQ. But when I go in details I think that we can do it without MSMQ also, so I want to know what is key benefit of MSMQ. Why should someone use MSMQ in his own application. 回答1: MSMQ is a great piece of Windows. It is basically a message-oriented middleware that helps a lot in some software architectures. This mainly addresses the common use case of asynchronous message processing: you have a service Service1 that communicates