moxy

I am sending a POST request create a resource named ContentInstance . Resource: ContentInstance . // // This file was generated by the JavaTM Architecture for XML Binding(JAXB) Reference Implementation, v2.2.4-2 import java.math.BigInteger; import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlAccessType; import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlAccessorType; import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlElement; import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlRootElement; import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlSchemaType; import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlType; @XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD) @XmlType(name = "", propOrder = {

I am declaring a List object property with: @XmlRootElement(namespace = "...") @XmlType public class Test { private List<String> myList; @XmlElementWrapper(name = "myListWrapper") @XmlElement(name = "myList") public List<String> getMyList() { return myList; } } When an instance of this class with an empty list myList is marshalled, MOXy is not generating an empty wrapper MyListWrapper . However, JAXB RI would do it. The generated XML looks like this when using the RI: <ns2:test xmlns:ns2="..."> <myListWrapper/> </ns2:intensionalSet> Is there a way to obtain the same result with MOXy? Note: I'm

Currently I'm working with CXF but because of the following code in CXF: // fall back if we're using another jaxb implementation try { riContext = JAXBUtils.createRIContext(contextClasses .toArray(new Class[contextClasses.size()]), tns); } CXF loads both Moxy and the RI JAXB context (Probably depends on non standard APIs). The overhead in startup time and memory is too high in my case. I'm looking for a good open source JAX-WS implementation (CXF replacement) which will work with Moxy as expected. The Metro implementation of JAX-WS (that GlassFish uses) can easily be configured to use MOXy as

I'm developing a number of Java classes that must serialize to XML in the following format: <foo value="123"/> <!-- or this --> <bar value="abc"/> <!-- or this --> <baz value="true"/> In the beginning, Foo.java looked something like this: @XmlRootElement @XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD) class Foo { @XmlAttribute String value; // snip constructors // snip methods // getValue // equals, hashCode, toString // static valueOf(String), static valueOf(int) } It doesn't take much imagination to guess what Bar.java and Baz.java might look like. These are very simple wrapper classes for (in this

When I send this request: {"invalidField": "value", "date": "value"} to my rest service: @PUT @Consumes("application/json") public void putJson(Test content) { System.out.println(content.toString()); } I expected to get an exception because: There is no invalidField in my domain model. Date format is not valid. But really I get test object with null values. My dmain model is: public class Test { private String name; private Date date; //getters and setters here } I think this is not a valid behavior. How can I fix that? Thanks for help. Solution: As Blaise Doughan said, it is required to

I would like to have the following returned to the browser (view source) <content> <![CDATA[Please show this inside a unescaped CDATA tag]]> </content> But I acutally get <content> Please show this inside a unescaped CDATA tag </content> If, I change the value of content to be &lt ;![CDATA[Please show this inside a unescaped CDATA tag]]&gt ; , the less than and the greater than for the tag are escaped. Wondering how to achieve what I wanted???? Here is my code import javax.ws.rs.GET; import javax.ws.rs.Path; import javax.ws.rs.PathParam; import javax.ws.rs.Produces; import javax.ws.rs.core