merge | 易学教程

Merging two branches A and B where A contains files that were deleted from B

阅读更多关于 Merging two branches A and B where A contains files that were deleted from B

问题 Ok, so the basic idea is that there are some files that I want to ensure get reinstated or "undeleted". I am not exactly sure what happened, but I have git branches A and B and I am 99% that B was branched off of A. After I created B, I deleted some files from B and then made a lot of changes. I now want to merge with A, but I am afraid that what will happen is that the deleted files from B will be permanently dropped when I merge the branches. Has anyone handled this type of situation before

Merging two branches A and B where A contains files that were deleted from B

阅读更多关于 Merging two branches A and B where A contains files that were deleted from B

Gulp merge json files from different folders while keeping folder structure

阅读更多关于 Gulp merge json files from different folders while keeping folder structure

问题 I would like to merge multiple .json files from different folders while keeping the general folder structure. Input /lang/module1/file1.json /lang/module1/file2.json /lang/module2/file1.json /lang/module2/subModule1/file1.json /lang_additional/module1/file1.json /lang_additional/module1/file2.json /lang_additional/module2/file1.json /lang_additional/module2/subModule1/file1.json Expected Output /dist/lang/module1/file1.json (both file1.json's merged) /dist/lang/module1/file2.json (both file2

ClearCase merge-conflict-on-rebase mystery — why does manual merges are sometimes required when doing a rebase for a file that has NO local changes?

阅读更多关于 ClearCase merge-conflict-on-rebase mystery — why does manual merges are sometimes required when doing a rebase for a file that has NO local changes?

问题 Here's a rather advanced question for true ClearCase experts: I frequently perform a rebase on a ClearCase snapshot view that has just a very limited number of small changes in few files (e.g. file1.c, file2.c, file3.c). I do it with the following on the UNIX command line: cleartool rebase -recommended -complete Sometimes, while this command runs, out of the blue, and for no exlained reasons (yet), I get prompted for manual input to solve some "merge" conflicts. But they make no sense to me,

GIT分支和合并命令之git-switch

阅读更多关于 GIT分支和合并命令之git-switch

名称NAME git-switch - 切换分支概要SYNOPSIS git switch [<options>] [--no-guess] <branch> git switch [<options>] --detach [<start-point>] git switch [<options>] (-c|-C) <new-branch> [<start-point>] git switch [<options>] --orphan <new-branch> 描述DESCRIPTION 切换到指定的分支。工作树和索引将更新以匹配分支。所有新的提交都将添加到该分支的尖端中。可选地，可以使用-c，-C从同名的远程分支中自动创建一个新分支（请参阅--guess），或者使用--detach在切换的时候，将工作树从任何分支中分离出来。切换分支不需要干净的索引和工作树（即与HEAD相比没有区别）。但是，如果该操作导致丢失本地更改，则该操作将中止，除非另行告知 --discard-changes 或 --merge 。选项OPTIONS <branch> Branch to switch to. <new-branch> Name for the new branch. <start-point> 新分支的起点。指定一个<start-point>允许你基于历史记录中其他点

Add reactive values from click events to existing data frame and update plot

阅读更多关于 Add reactive values from click events to existing data frame and update plot

问题 I'm new to using Shiny and having some problems with adding reactive values to an existing data frame. I would like to plot a scatter plot with a regression line using some preexisting data and update it with user clicks. I found a helpful example, but I can't figure out how to store the reactive values in a data frame in order to update the regression line. Here is what I tried. Thank you. library(shiny) ui <- basicPage( plotOutput("plot1", click = "plot_click"), verbatimTextOutput("info"),

Subversion: For merging, how to add renaming meta information later, after the commit?

阅读更多关于 Subversion: For merging, how to add renaming meta information later, after the commit?

问题 Note: The underlying situation of this question is also part of a slightly different question here. Situation I have a trunk, where earlier, a branch has been made from. Then, in the trunk some file renamings have been made. These renamings were accidentially made by "copy/delete", not with the proper svn rename process as they should have. This is described in the TSVN docs, and in my case the "Repair move" was omitted. Now I have tree conflicts, when merging the branch back to the trunk:

Merging a data frame and a lookup table in r, retaining all records from data frame

阅读更多关于 Merging a data frame and a lookup table in r, retaining all records from data frame

问题 I have a data frame of 59720 obs. that looks like below. I want to assign a MARKETNAME to each observation from a lookup table. > data (a) DAY HOUR LEAD Row.Count DATE ITIME HOMEPHONE CITY STATE ZIPCODE ZONENAME 1 Monday 13:00 1 9430 7/1/2013 13:42:51 FORT LAUDERDALE FL 33315 68 2 Monday 13:00 1 9432 7/1/2013 13:43:50 xxxxx9802x PLEASANT GROVE AL 35127 82 3 Monday 13:00 1 9434 7/1/2013 13:46:18 5xxxx85x10 ORO VALLEY AZ 85737 54 4 Monday 0:00 1 9435 7/1/2013 0:04:34 50xxxx1x364 SPOKANE WA

Resolving SVN merge postponed conflicts recursively

阅读更多关于 Resolving SVN merge postponed conflicts recursively

问题 I have a dev branch that hasn't been touched for a while. I merged the trunk into it to integrate many fixes/changes in the main line since it was branched out, but now I have many small conflicts (merge-left/merge-right). I want the latest trunk revision to be used to resolve each conflict. Is there a command I can run that will resolve all conflicts under a working copy in one direction automatically (merge-right should be used for all conflicts)? EDIT: As indicated in the comments, I tried

How can I trust Git merge?

阅读更多关于 How can I trust Git merge?

问题 I am not certain I can trust Git to merge automatically. Here is a scenario. Create a program in the master: MOVE 0 TO I. A. PERFORM X-PROC. IF I IS EQUAL TO 25 THEN GO TO A. Developer 1 makes a branch and notices that there is a bug: an infinite loop. He fixes it: MOVE 0 TO I. A. ADD 1 TO I. PERFORM X-PROC. IF I IS EQUAL TO 25 THEN GO TO A. Meanwhile Developer 2 makes a branch and fixes the bug in her own way: MOVE 0 TO I. A. PERFORM X-PROC. ADD 1 TO I. IF I IS EQUAL TO 25 THEN GO TO A. Both