mercurial-bigfiles | 易学教程

For binary files should I use bfiles or bigfiles?

阅读更多关于 For binary files should I use bfiles or bigfiles?

问题 There are a few mercurial extensions for dealing with large binary files. Bfiles BigFiles Snap kbfiles others? I'd like to use the one that is most likely to be official (ie distributed with mercurial). Kiln 2.0 uses a fork of Bfiles for its binary files. Does that make it more likely to become official? Which is the preferred (semi-official) extension for handling binary files? 回答1: It appears that Mercurial is planning to incorporate the 'largefiles' extension for the November 2.0 release.

Git analog to Hg's Bigfiles Extension?

阅读更多关于 Git analog to Hg's Bigfiles Extension?

I want something in git that is similar to Mercurial's Bigfiles Extension (note: I know of git-bigfiles , but that is unrelated). Basically I want to store large binaries in my git repository, but I don't want to get every version ever of the large binary when I do a clone. I only want to download the large binaries when I checkout a specific revision containing those large files. Mark Longair Here are a few options to consider: Shallow clones : You can add the --depth <depth> parameter to git clone to get a shallow clone of the repository. e.g. if <depth> is 1, this means that the clone will

Git analog to Hg's Bigfiles Extension?

阅读更多关于 Git analog to Hg's Bigfiles Extension?

问题 I want something in git that is similar to Mercurial's Bigfiles Extension (note: I know of git-bigfiles, but that is unrelated). Basically I want to store large binaries in my git repository, but I don't want to get every version ever of the large binary when I do a clone. I only want to download the large binaries when I checkout a specific revision containing those large files. 回答1: Here are a few options to consider: Shallow clones : You can add the --depth <depth> parameter to git clone