lookup

mac dns look up misbehaving

随声附和 提交于 2019-12-02 06:54:26
Got a new mac and now I'm trying to install/update some stuff. THe first issue I get is that http requests made from inside scripts/programs (such as git or ruby gem) doesn't work. I'll put an example below of the workaround I used because it illustrates the issue better than any explanation. Any help is appreciated! Leonardos-MacBook-Air:~ leo$ git clone git://github.com/sstephenson/rbenv.git .rbenv Cloning into '.rbenv'... fatal: Unable to look up github.com (port 9418) (nodename nor servname provided, or not known) # it can not find github.com Leonardos-MacBook-Air:~ leo$ ping github.com

Lookup value from another column that matches with variable

我是研究僧i 提交于 2019-12-01 22:18:53
I have a dataframe that looks like: animal_id trait_id sire_id dam_id 1 25.05 0 0 2 -46.3 1 2 3 41.6 1 2 4 -42.76 3 4 5 -10.99 3 4 6 -49.81 5 4 I want to create another variable that contains the estimate of "trait_id" for each "sire_id" and "dam_id". All sires (sire_id) and dams (dam_id) are also present in the animal_id column. So what I want to do is to look for their measurement in the trait_id and repeat this variable in the new variable. The outcome that I want is: animal_id trait_id sire_id trait_sire dam_id trait_dam 1 25.05 0 NA 0 NA 2 -46.3 1 25.05 2 -46.3 3 41.6 1 25.05 2 -46.3 4

Lookup value from another column that matches with variable

拈花ヽ惹草 提交于 2019-12-01 21:57:43
问题 I have a dataframe that looks like: animal_id trait_id sire_id dam_id 1 25.05 0 0 2 -46.3 1 2 3 41.6 1 2 4 -42.76 3 4 5 -10.99 3 4 6 -49.81 5 4 I want to create another variable that contains the estimate of "trait_id" for each "sire_id" and "dam_id". All sires (sire_id) and dams (dam_id) are also present in the animal_id column. So what I want to do is to look for their measurement in the trait_id and repeat this variable in the new variable. The outcome that I want is: animal_id trait_id

@EJB injection vs lookup - performance issue

此生再无相见时 提交于 2019-12-01 18:43:36
I have a question related with possible performance issue while using @EJB annotation. Imagine following scenario public class MyBean1 implements MyBean1Remote{ @EJB private MyBean2Remote myBean2; @EJB private MyBean2Remote myBean3; ... @EJB private MyBean20Remote myBean20; } There is a bean with many dependencies to other beans. According to EJB spec if I would like to inject MyBean1Remote to some other bean, container would have to take all required dependencies from its pool inject it into MyBean1Remote and then inject reference to MyBean1Remote stub. so in following scenario container

Find-or-insert with only one lookup in c# dictionary

别说谁变了你拦得住时间么 提交于 2019-12-01 15:19:17
问题 I'm a former C++/STL programmer trying to code a fast marching algorithm using c#/.NET technology... I'm searching for an equivalent of STL method "map::insert" that insert a value at given key if not exists, else returns an iterator to the existing key-value pair. The only way I found does this with two lookups : one inside TryGetValue and another one in Add method : List<Point> list; if (!_dictionary.TryGetValue (pcost, out list)) { list = new List<Point> (); dictionary.Add (pcost, list); }

Entity Framework Mapping to Lookup table

☆樱花仙子☆ 提交于 2019-12-01 06:32:32
I have 3 tables that need to be mapped with Entity Framework and I'm not sure the proper way to go about this. Here are my 3 entities: public class User { [Key] public int user_id {get; set;} public string user_name {get; set;} public virtual List<Role> roles {get; set;} } public class Role { [Key] public int role_id {get; set;} public string role_name {get; set;} } public class User_Role { [Key] public int user_role_id {get; set;} public int user_id {get; set;} public int role_id {get; set;} } Please note that the User_Role entity just represents a lookup table to link many roles to a single

$project in $lookup mongodb

纵饮孤独 提交于 2019-12-01 06:05:16
I have a query, that use $lookup to "join" two models, after this i use $project to select olny the fields that i need, but my $project brings an arrray of objects ( user_detail ) that contains more data that i need. I want only two fields ( scheduleStart and scheduleEnd ) of my result. My query: User.aggregate([{ $match: { storeKey: req.body.store, } }, { $group: { _id: { id: "$_id", name: "$name", cpf: "$cpf", phone: "$phone", email: "$email", birthday: "$birthday", lastName: "$lastname" }, totalServices: { $sum: "$services" }, } }, { $lookup: { from: "schedules", localField: "_id.phone",

Generating AES (AES-256) Lookup Tables

戏子无情 提交于 2019-12-01 05:54:24
I am trying to implement AES-256 in CTR mode using nVidia CUDA. I have successfully coded CPU code for key expansion and now I need to implement the actual AES-256 algorithm. According to Wikipedia, some codes I've seen and particularly this PDF (page 9), AES rounds can be implemented as series of table lookups. My question is how do I generate these tables? I am aware that I need 4 KB to store these tables, and that is not a problem. I have spent whole day trying to find these tables with no success. The PDF I posted a link to mentions lookup tables T0, T1, T2 and T3, but I do not know what

Entity Framework Mapping to Lookup table

ε祈祈猫儿з 提交于 2019-12-01 05:09:21
问题 I have 3 tables that need to be mapped with Entity Framework and I'm not sure the proper way to go about this. Here are my 3 entities: public class User { [Key] public int user_id {get; set;} public string user_name {get; set;} public virtual List<Role> roles {get; set;} } public class Role { [Key] public int role_id {get; set;} public string role_name {get; set;} } public class User_Role { [Key] public int user_role_id {get; set;} public int user_id {get; set;} public int role_id {get; set;}

Generating AES (AES-256) Lookup Tables

空扰寡人 提交于 2019-12-01 03:34:29
问题 I am trying to implement AES-256 in CTR mode using nVidia CUDA. I have successfully coded CPU code for key expansion and now I need to implement the actual AES-256 algorithm. According to Wikipedia, some codes I've seen and particularly this PDF (page 9), AES rounds can be implemented as series of table lookups. My question is how do I generate these tables? I am aware that I need 4 KB to store these tables, and that is not a problem. I have spent whole day trying to find these tables with no