logical-operators

What is wrong with the short circuit logic in this Java code?

女生的网名这么多〃 提交于 2019-12-01 16:12:12
Why doesn't func3 get executed in the program below? After func1, func2 doesn't need to get evaluated but for func3, shouldn't it? if (func1() || func2() && func3()) { System.out.println("true"); } else { System.out.println("false"); } } public static boolean func1() { System.out.println("func1"); return true; } public static boolean func2() { System.out.println("func2"); return false; } public static boolean func3() { System.out.println("func3"); return false; } You're using a short-circuited or. If the first argument is true, the entire expression is true. It might help if I add the implicit

Compare a value to null. Why is this true?

落花浮王杯 提交于 2019-12-01 15:29:20
问题 Why is isTRUE(NULL != 2) [1] FALSE And how would I receive TRUE? In my real case I have variables and I want to process something, if the values differ. However, when one value is NULL I don't recognize them as different! 回答1: As @Roland pointed out, we can't perform any logical operations directly on NULL object. To compare them we might need to perform an additional check of is.null and then perform the logical comparison. We can use identical instead to compare values which handles

Is it possible to use an AND operator in grepl()?

喜欢而已 提交于 2019-12-01 15:07:55
问题 I want to search for anything that begins with 55 and anything that has the word Roof (case-sensitive, for those who are curious) in it. So far I have been unsuccessful, as I can only seem to use the OR operator: grepl("*^55|*Roof", dataset$longname) Ultimately, I want to achieve something like this: grepl("*^55&&*Roof", dataset$longname) or grepl("*^55&*Roof", dataset$longname) (Clearly, neither of these work - they're for illustration only.) I want my results to show anything that begins

Checking the “boolean” result of an “int” type

旧街凉风 提交于 2019-12-01 14:55:53
I'm learning Java, coming from C and I found an interesting difference between languages with the boolean type. In C there is no bool / ean so we need to use numeric types to represent boolean logic ( 0 == false ). I guess in Java that doesn't work: int i = 1; if (i) System.out.println("i is true"); Nor does changing the conditional via a typecast: if ((boolean)i) So besides doing something like: if ( i != 0 ) Is there any other way to do a C-ish logic check on an int type? Just wondering if there were any Java tricks that allow boolean logic on non-boolean types like this. EDIT: The example

PHP FizzBuzz Logic

廉价感情. 提交于 2019-12-01 13:41:05
When we write the fizzbuzz script, why are we testing to see if it is equal to 0? Or am I misunderstanding? Example: $i % 3 == 0 <?php for ($i=1; $i<=100; $i++) { if ($i%3==0 && $i%5==0) { echo 'FizzBuzz'; }else if($i%3==0){ echo 'Fizz'; }else if($i%5==0){ echo 'Buzz'; }else{ echo $i; } echo "\n"; } The program fizzbuzz prints 'fizz' if a number is divisible by 3, 'buzz' if a number is divisible by 5, and 'fizzbuzz' if a number is divisible by both. Your program is not checking if the numbers are equal to 0, instead it is using the modulo operator to check if the remainders are 0. $i%3==0

Confusion with post increment and logical operator?

你说的曾经没有我的故事 提交于 2019-12-01 12:40:30
问题 #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> main() { int i=-1, j=-1, k=0, l=2,m; m = i++&&j++&&k++||l++; printf("%d%d%d%d%d", i, j, k, l, m); } Output: 00131 I am confused how the expression is getting evaluated. 回答1: All that really matters here is the || . Since l++ evaluates to the boolean 1 (true), the entire statement is true. So m is 1, and the rest are just their original values plus one for the post increment after they are evaluated. You're evaluating the boolean expression: ((-1 && -1) &

(change) event hook in angular2

本秂侑毒 提交于 2019-12-01 10:52:38
I know about the (change) event Binding in angular2 but i am surprised why my code is not working as expected? My code is here.. http://plnkr.co/edit/9pSWSeqBc5oaSAtsfwNY?p=preview When the change event is called not both condition work as expected. (change)="holiday= !holiday && employee= !employee" When change event is called the first time it works fine but the second time it will work only for first condition i.e holiday . In my example what I expected is both the value to be either true or false but not as expected. Surely there is some mistake. Is there anyone who can explain the life

(change) event hook in angular2

隐身守侯 提交于 2019-12-01 08:17:37
问题 I know about the (change) event Binding in angular2 but i am surprised why my code is not working as expected? My code is here.. http://plnkr.co/edit/9pSWSeqBc5oaSAtsfwNY?p=preview When the change event is called not both condition work as expected. (change)="holiday= !holiday && employee= !employee" When change event is called the first time it works fine but the second time it will work only for first condition i.e holiday . In my example what I expected is both the value to be either true

short hand for chaining logical operators in javascript?

笑着哭i 提交于 2019-12-01 03:45:36
Is there a better way to write the following conditional in javascript? if ( value == 1 || value == 16 || value == -500 || value == 42.42 || value == 'something' ) { // blah blah blah } I hate having all of those logical ORs strung together. I'm wondering if there is some kind of shorthand. Thanks! var a = [1, 16, -500, 42.42, 'something']; var value = 42; if (a.indexOf(value) > -1){ // blah blah blah } Upd: Utility function sample as proposed in comments: Object.prototype.in = function(){ for(var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++){ if (this == arguments[i]) return true; } return false; } So

Overloading logical operators considered bad practice?

点点圈 提交于 2019-12-01 03:02:57
Is it a bad idea to overload &&, || or comma operator and Why? Fred Foo I wouldn't overload operator&& or operator|| . Even if you define a class that gives rise to a Boolean algebra (finite sets, for example), it would probably be a better choice to overload operator& and operator| . The reason is that C++ programmers expect special semantics for operator&& and operator|| : they are short-circuited , i.e. don't evaluate their right-hand argument if not necessary. You can't get this behavior by overloading, since you'll be defining a function. Overloading operator, has been done in e.g. the