locking

How to synchronize threads in python?

孤街醉人 提交于 2019-12-06 06:21:34
I have two threads in python (2.7). I start them at the beginning of my program. While they execute, my program reaches the end and exits, killing both of my threads before waiting for resolution. I'm trying to figure out how to wait for both threads to finish before exiting. def connect_cam(ip, execute_lock): try: conn = TelnetConnection.TelnetClient(ip) execute_lock.acquire() ExecuteUpdate(conn, ip) execute_lock.release() except ValueError: pass execute_lock = thread.allocate_lock() thread.start_new_thread(connect_cam, ( headset_ip, execute_lock ) ) thread.start_new_thread(connect_cam, (

Detect workstation/System Screen Lock using Python(ubuntu)

人盡茶涼 提交于 2019-12-06 06:09:05
Is there anyway that we can detect when the system/screen gets locked and notify some event to trigger in Ubuntu ? There is a possibility to be notified when the screen becomes locked/unlocked with DBus, this is reference on GnomeScreensaver showing the basics of it. I am not DBus expert, but there are bindings for python, so you can listen for DBus events in python. Combinig the two, you should be able to get what you want:-). Here is a python-dbus programming tutorial on wikibooks. 来源: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2395579/detect-workstation-system-screen-lock-using-pythonubuntu

Data base pessimistic locks with Spring data JPA (Hibernate under the hood)

落爺英雄遲暮 提交于 2019-12-06 05:56:01
问题 I need some help with pessimistic entity locking. I'm using PostgreSQL and Spring data JPA (hibernate 5 under the hood) in my application. So, I want to show a task I've faced with. I have some user accounts with money: @lombok.Data //Used to generate getters and setters @Entity class AccountEntity { @Id @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY) private Integer id; private Long balance; } And payments, that allows to transfer money from one account to another @lombok.Data @Entity

SQLAlchemy session and connection relationship

别等时光非礼了梦想. 提交于 2019-12-06 05:35:38
Do queries executed with the same SQLAlchemy session object use the same underlying connection? If not, is there a way to ensure this? Some background: I have a need to use MySQL's named lock feature, i.e. GET_LOCK() and RELEASE_LOCK() functions. As far as the MySQL server is concerned, only the connection that obtained the lock can release it - so I have to make sure that I either execute these two commands within the same connection or the connection dies to ensure the lock is released. To make things nicer, I have created a "locked" context like so: @contextmanager def mysql_named_lock

MongoDB Read/Write Locks

北城以北 提交于 2019-12-06 05:35:15
问题 I'm planning to create an application using nodejs that users can rate the products. From what I heard locks are different in mongodb than mySql. I'm worried that if let's say 10 users vote on a product at a same time, Mongodb can't handle it and the result other users see is not correct. I looked at similar questions but I'm still confused! Is mongodb a good choice or should I just use Mysql? I'd appreciate your help 回答1: Locking is described in this Concurrency FAQ in the MongoDB

Cloud Firestore document locking

北慕城南 提交于 2019-12-06 05:17:22
问题 To ensure exclusive use of a Cloud Firestore document in a shared setting, is it sufficient to read, then write to a field (eg 'lockedBy') within a transaction? 回答1: Pessimistic vs Optimistic There is no native exclusive locking in Cloud Firestore. As the system is designed to run in large distributed systems (e.g, 1000's of mobile phone users or a Kubernetes cluster), it is based around optimistic locking patterns. This means that when you do a read-write transaction, if the document you

DataReader Behaviour With SQL Server Locking

久未见 提交于 2019-12-06 05:14:59
问题 We are having some issues with our data layer when large datasets are returned from a SQL server query via a DataReader . As we use the DataReader to populate business objects and serialize them back to the client, the fetch can take several minutes (we are showing progress to the user :-)), but we've found that there's some pretty hard-core locking going on on the affected tables which is causing other updates to be blocked. So I guess my slightly naive question is, at what point are the

C# Interlocked functions as a lock mechanism?

Deadly 提交于 2019-12-06 05:09:47
While I was reading about ReaderWriterLockSlim lock mechanism , There was this guy who suggested that Interlock Functions can be used for a finer locking Also, I found here another answer from Marc : ...Writes make their change to a cloned copy, then use Interlocked.CompareExchange to swap the reference (re-applying their change if another thread mutated the reference in the interim). Well , Currently all I know about Interlocked object , is that it is used (in a multithreaded environment) to do atomic additions , compare , compareExchange operations. (and I know how to use it) But ( and here

ReaderWriterLock for array

亡梦爱人 提交于 2019-12-06 05:07:48
问题 I have an array, that represents an inventory, with nearly 50 elements (items: some costum objects) and I need a readerwritelock for it (okay, i think a simple lock would be enough too). It should support both reference changing and value changing. As reading and writing to different position of the array is threadsafe (Proof) I want to ensure that multiple read/write operations on the same array position is also threadsafe. I surely could create 50 readerwriterlocks, but I don't want that ;)

FileChannel & RandomAccessFile don't seem to work

荒凉一梦 提交于 2019-12-06 05:06:31
To put it simple: a swing app that uses sqlitejdbc as backend. Currently, there's no problem launching multiple instances that work with the same database file. And there should be. The file is locked (can't delete it while the app is running) so the check should be trivial. Turns out not. File f = new File("/path/to/file/db.sqlite"); FileChannel channel = new RandomAccessFile(f, "rw").getChannel(); System.out.println(channel.isOpen()); System.out.println(channel.tryLock()); results in true sun.nio.ch.FileLockImpl[0:9223372036854775807 exclusive valid] No matter whether the app is running or