lapack

权威的C ++书籍指南和清单

ぐ巨炮叔叔 提交于 2019-11-29 14:23:20
这篇文章是 社区维基 。 编辑现有答案以改善此职位。 它当前不接受新的答案。 这个问题试图收集每年出版的数十本糟糕的C ++书籍中的珍珠。 与许多其他编程语言不同,这些语言通常是在Internet上的教程中经常使用的,而无需学习一本精心编写的C ++书籍,很少有人能够快速使用C ++。 这样做太大,太复杂。 实际上,它是如此之大和复杂,以至于 有很多非常糟糕的C ++书籍 。 我们不是在谈论不良的风格,而是诸如炫耀 明显的事实错误 和 推广极差的不良编程风格之类的东西 。 请编辑接受的答案,以提供 优质的书籍 和大致的技能水平- 最好 是 在C ++聊天室中 讨论添加内容 之后 。 (如果常规员工不同意建议,他们可能会毫不留情地撤消您的工作。)为您亲自阅读/受益的每本书添加简短的简介/说明。 随时讨论质量,标题等。符合条件的书籍将添加到列表中。 具有C和C ++用户协会(ACCU)的评论的书籍具有该评论的链接。 *注意:常见问题解答和其他资源可以在 C ++标签信息 和 c ++-faq下找到 。 #1楼 初学者 入门,没有以前的编程经验 C ++ Primer *(Stanley Lippman,JoséeLajoie和Barbara E. Moo)( 针对C ++ 11更新 )以1k页的篇幅 对C ++ 进行了非常全面的介绍,它以一种易于访问的格式涵盖了该语言的几乎所有内容

calculate the V from A = USVt in objective-C with SVD from LAPACK in xcode

泪湿孤枕 提交于 2019-11-29 12:57:12
My goal is to transfer a coordinate in perspective from a known rectangle (for example a 800 by 600 screen) to a quadrangle that is skewed/rotated. To do so i found this, which was extremely helpful: Transforming captured co-ordinates into screen co-ordinates I guess there are more solutions to the problem. 1 by making triangles out of your quadrangle and apply some mathematical function which i could not solve yet. OR using the H-matrix which comes out of the formula A=USVt. which seemed nice because once you have the correct H-matrix you can transfer any coordinate pretty easy as explained

Function return type mismatch

人盡茶涼 提交于 2019-11-29 12:19:10
I'm attempting to recode an old C++ program in Fortran to make use of LAPACK (I'm aware that C++ does have LAPACK++, but I'm having a lot of trouble installing it, so I gave up). I originally didn't have any problems with compilation, but that was when I had all variables declared as REAL . When I started coding the section of the program that required LAPACK, I found that all parameters passed to DSYEV need to be DOUBLE PRECISION . So I tried to change everything to double precision (including changing all hard coded numbers to their double precision counterparts, i.e. 0.0 -> 0.0D0) Now when

How to perform matrix inverse operation using the accelerate framework?

戏子无情 提交于 2019-11-29 10:58:15
I would like to find the inverse of a matrix. I know this involves first LU factorisation then the inversion step but I cannot find the required function by searching apple's docs of 10.7! This seems like a useful post Symmetric Matrix Inversion in C using CBLAS/LAPACK , pointing out that the sgetrf_ and sgetri_ functions should be used. However searching these terms I find nothing in Xcode docs. Does anybody have boiler plate code for this matrix operation? Apple does not document the LAPACK code at all, I guess because they just implement the standard interface from netlib.org . It's a shame

Armadillo + BLAS + LAPACK: Linking error?

一个人想着一个人 提交于 2019-11-29 07:40:02
When I try to compile example1.cpp that comes with Armadillo 2.4.2, I keep getting the following linking error: /tmp/ccbnLbA0.o: In function `double arma::blas::dot<double>(unsigned int, double const*, double const*)': main.cpp:(.text._ZN4arma4blas3dotIdEET_jPKS2_S4_[double arma::blas::dot<double>(unsigned int, double const*, double const*)]+0x3b): undefined reference to `wrapper_ddot_' /tmp/ccbnLbA0.o: In function `void arma::blas::gemv<double>(char const*, int const*, int const*, double const*, double const*, int const*, double const*, int const*, double const*, double*, int const*)': main

Parallel linear algebra for multicore system [closed]

半腔热情 提交于 2019-11-29 04:08:40
I'm developing a program that needs to do heavy linear algebra calculations. Now I'm using LAPACK/BLAS routines, but I need to exploit my machine (24 core Xeon X5690). I've found projects like pblas and scalapack , but they all seem to focus on distributed computing and on using MPI. I have no cluster available, all computations will be done on a single server and using MPI looks like an overkill. Does anyone have any suggestion on this? As mentioned by @larsmans (with, say, MKL), you still use LAPACK + BLAS interfaces, but you just find a tuned, multithreaded version for your platform. MKL is

c++11 std::array vs static array vs std::vector

浪尽此生 提交于 2019-11-29 01:08:13
问题 First question, is it a good thing to start using c++11 if I will develop a code for the 3 following years? Then if it is, what is the "best" way to implement a matrix if I want to use it with Lapack? I mean, doing std::vector<std::vector< Type > > Matrix is not easily compatible with Lapack. Up to now, I stored my matrix with Type* Matrix(new Type[N]) (the pointer form with new and delete were important because the size of the array is not given as a number like 5, but as a variable). But

Solving a linear system with Lapack's dgeqrf_

Deadly 提交于 2019-11-29 00:43:58
I am trying to factorize a matrix with the QR factorization in C++, using Lapack's functions in order to solve a system of linear equations (Ax=b) As far as I understood, dgeqrf computes the QR factorization and overwrites the input matrix. The output clearly contains values for L (upper triangular), but how do I obtain Q? I tried dormqr , which is said to calculate Q from dgeqrf 's output, but the result is the same matrix as in the previous call. Here's my complete code: boost::numeric::ublas::matrix<double> in_A(4, 3); in_A(0, 0) = 1.0; in_A(0, 1) = 2.0; in_A(0, 2) = 3.0; in_A(1, 1) = -3.0;

Undefined reference to LAPACK and BLAS subroutines

不羁的心 提交于 2019-11-28 14:26:10
I'm trying to understand how BLAS and LAPACK in Fortran work and so on, so I made a code that generates a matrix and inverts it. Here's the code program test Implicit none external ZGETRF external ZGETRI integer ::M complex*16,allocatable,dimension(:,:)::A complex*16,allocatable,dimension(:)::WORK integer,allocatable,dimension(:)::IPIV integer i,j,info,error Print*, 'Enter size of the matrix' Read*, M Print*, 'Enter file of the matrix' READ(*,*), A OPEN(UNIT=10,FILE = '(/A/)' ,STATUS='OLD',ACTION='READ') allocate(A(M,M),WORK(M),IPIV(M),stat=error) if (error.ne.0)then print *,"error:not enough

Incorrect/inconsistent results from zgeev() LAPACK

岁酱吖の 提交于 2019-11-28 11:43:46
问题 I am attempting to use ZGEEV to calculate eigenvalues and eigenvectors, however am having some trouble with the output being incorrect and also inconsistent when used at different optimization levels. Below is my Fortran code with results at -O1 and -O2 optimization levels. I have also included Python code for comparison. I can only assume that I am calling zgeev() incorrectly somehow, however I am not able to determine how. I believe it is unlikely to be an issue with my LAPACK installation