language-implementation

PyPy — How can it possibly beat CPython?

ε祈祈猫儿з 提交于 2019-11-27 16:34:45
From the Google Open Source Blog : PyPy is a reimplementation of Python in Python, using advanced techniques to try to attain better performance than CPython. Many years of hard work have finally paid off. Our speed results often beat CPython, ranging from being slightly slower, to speedups of up to 2x on real application code, to speedups of up to 10x on small benchmarks. How is this possible? Which Python implementation was used to implement PyPy? CPython ? And what are the chances of a PyPyPy or PyPyPyPy beating their score? (On a related note... why would anyone try something like this?)

How is foreach implemented in C#? [duplicate]

别来无恙 提交于 2019-11-27 13:58:33
This question already has an answer here: How do foreach loops work in C#? 7 answers How exactly is foreach implemented in C#? I imagine a part of it looking like: var enumerator = TInput.GetEnumerator(); while(enumerator.MoveNext()) { // do some stuff here } However I'm unsure what's really going on. What methodology is used for returning enumerator.Current for each cycle? Does it return [for each cycle] or does it take an anonymous function or something to execute the body of foreach ? It doesn't use an anonymous function, no. Basically the compiler converts the code into something broadly

Why can you omit the surrounding parentheses for generators in Python when passing it into a function?

╄→гoц情女王★ 提交于 2019-11-27 06:56:20
问题 I was just experimenting in Python with different syntax for passing in a generator as an argument to a function, and I realized that although I've been doing this, >>> sum((j for j in xrange(5))) 10 this works as well: >>> sum(j for j in xrange(5)) 10 This is tested on Python 2.6.6 on Linux. What's going on under the hood? Is it just syntactic sugar? After all, usually an unwrapped generator is indecipherable to the interpreter: >>> j for j in xrange(5) File "<stdin>", line 1 j for j in

range for integer values of chars in c++

二次信任 提交于 2019-11-27 06:40:34
问题 I'm reading The C++ Programming Language and in it Stroustrup states that the int value of a char can range from 0 to 255 or -127 to 127, depending on implementation. Is this correct? It seems like it should be from -128 to 127. If not, why are their only 255 possible values in the second implementation possibility, not 256. 回答1: You're stuck in two's complement thinking - The C++ standard does not define the representation used for negative numbers! If your computer (god forbid) uses ones's

How is the C++ exception handling runtime implemented?

℡╲_俬逩灬. 提交于 2019-11-27 00:04:31
I am intrigued by how the C++ exception handling mechanism works. Specifically, where is the exception object stored and how does it propagate through several scopes until it is caught? Is it stored in some global area? Since this could be compiler specific could somebody explain this in the context of the g++ compiler suite? Implementations may differ, but there are some basic ideas that follow from requirements. The exception object itself is an object created in one function, destroyed in a caller thereof. Hence, it's typically not feasible to create the object on the stack. On the other

Why are all fields in an interface implicitly static and final?

别说谁变了你拦得住时间么 提交于 2019-11-26 23:31:23
I am just trying to understand why all fields defined in an Interface are implicitly static and final . The idea of keeping fields static makes sense to me as you can't have objects of an interface but why they are final (implicitly)? Any one knows why Java designers went with making the fields in an interface static and final ? Adriaan Koster An interface can't have behavior or state because it is intended to specify only an interaction contract, no implementation details. No behavior is enforced by not allowing method/constructor bodies or static/instance initializing blocks. No state is

Why is __FILE__ uppercase and __dir__ lowercase?

浪尽此生 提交于 2019-11-26 20:05:55
问题 In Ruby 2.0.0-p0, the __dir__ variable was introduced for easy access to the directory of the file currently being executed. Why is __dir__ lowercase when __FILE__ is uppercase? 回答1: I think that is because __FILE__ is a parse-time constant whereas __dir__ is a function and returns File.dirname(File.realpath(__FILE__)) For more details, see This discussion 回答2: TL; DR The relative merits of language implementation choices are outside the scope of a reasonable Stack Overflow question. However,

Why does Python have a limit on the number of static blocks that can be nested?

不羁岁月 提交于 2019-11-26 19:39:57
问题 The number of statically nested blocks in Python is limited to 20. That is, nesting 19 for loops will be fine (although excessively time consuming; O(n^19) is insane), but nesting 20 will fail with: SyntaxError: too many statically nested blocks What is the underlying reason for having such a limit? Is there a way to increase the limit? 回答1: This limit not only applies to for loops, but to all other control flow blocks as well. The limit for the number of nested control flow blocks is defined

PyPy — How can it possibly beat CPython?

我怕爱的太早我们不能终老 提交于 2019-11-26 18:43:14
问题 From the Google Open Source Blog: PyPy is a reimplementation of Python in Python, using advanced techniques to try to attain better performance than CPython. Many years of hard work have finally paid off. Our speed results often beat CPython, ranging from being slightly slower, to speedups of up to 2x on real application code, to speedups of up to 10x on small benchmarks. How is this possible? Which Python implementation was used to implement PyPy? CPython? And what are the chances of a

How is foreach implemented in C#? [duplicate]

限于喜欢 提交于 2019-11-26 18:22:03
问题 This question already has an answer here: How do foreach loops work in C#? 7 answers How exactly is foreach implemented in C#? I imagine a part of it looking like: var enumerator = TInput.GetEnumerator(); while(enumerator.MoveNext()) { // do some stuff here } However I'm unsure what's really going on. What methodology is used for returning enumerator.Current for each cycle? Does it return [for each cycle] or does it take an anonymous function or something to execute the body of foreach ? 回答1: