kawa

Why Clojure over other JVM Lisps: Kawa, Armed Bear or SISC?

由 守給你的承諾、 提交于 2019-12-18 10:09:08
问题 The JVM already had three Lisps before Clojure arrived on the scene: Kawa, Armed Bear and SISC. What gap does Clojure fill that was left by those Lisps? 回答1: Kawa, ABCL, and SISC are reimplementations of existing languages that are quite long in the tooth. They are excellent if for some reason you want to use standard Scheme or standard Common Lisp on the JVM. Clojure is a new language. It doesn't fill a gap . It adds entirely new possibilities. It favors a purely functional approach- Scheme

How to convert a degrees calculation to radians? (Kawa to Java)

由 隐身守侯 提交于 2019-12-11 11:39:40
问题 I have tried to convert a calculation from an app I made using MIT AppInventor which uses Kawa to Android using Java.The problem I'm facing is that the trigonometric parts of the calculation in Kawa are using degress.My question is how do I translate this calculation to Java and get the same output? This is how I do the calculation is Kawa,all variables are of type double: Tri 1=atan(Offset Depth/Offset Length) Mark 1=sqrt(Offset Length^2+Offset Depth^2) Tri 2=(180-Tri1)/2 Mark 2=Duct Depth/

Why Clojure over other JVM Lisps: Kawa, Armed Bear or SISC?

由 我只是一个虾纸丫 提交于 2019-11-29 19:56:19
The JVM already had three Lisps before Clojure arrived on the scene: Kawa , Armed Bear and SISC . What gap does Clojure fill that was left by those Lisps? dnolen Kawa, ABCL, and SISC are reimplementations of existing languages that are quite long in the tooth. They are excellent if for some reason you want to use standard Scheme or standard Common Lisp on the JVM. Clojure is a new language. It doesn't fill a gap . It adds entirely new possibilities. It favors a purely functional approach- Scheme and CL are both multi-paradigm. Clojure borrows heavily from the design of various FP languages (ML
订阅 kawa