jooq

I have the following table called YNM: id name 1 YES 2 NO 3 MAYBE and want JOOQ to generate the following java enum: public enum YNM { YES,NO,MAYBE; } I understand that support for this was dropped in JOOQ 3 for being overly complicated/anti-intuitive. Is there a way of achieving this? Thanks in advance. Sure, you could re-implement the removed feature on your side in a few steps: 1. Implement the generator for that enum You would need to override the JavaGenerator to implement the code generation for the translation of your master data (might be several tables) to enums. How that works is

I need to create a JOOQ SELECT query dynamically based on the set of parameters. I dont know how to append it dynamically. Please help Thanks in advance. jOOQ has two types of APIs to construct queries. The DSL API that allows for creating inline SQL statements in your Java code, e.g. create.select(T.A, T.B).from(T).where(T.X.eq(3).and(T.Y.eq(5))); The "model" API that allows for incremental SQL building. At any time, you can access the "model" API through the getQuery() method on a DSL query object An example of what you want to do is given in the manual here: https://www.jooq.org/doc/latest

MyBatis provides the mapping, local cache, and logging out of the box. QueryDSL / jOOQ provide compile-time check of SQL statements and IDE auto-completion as a result. Is it possible to combine them? In other words, I would like to create a query with either QueryDSL or jOOQ, and then execute it with some glue code/adapters with MyBatis . What I have already checked: I considered to generate SQL query strings with QueryDSL and use them in MyBatis with its '@SelectProvider' annotation, but it seems to be a dead end: MyBatis requires "${xxx}" stuff in its SQL strings, but QueryDSL only

Can someone point me to some resources about the performance comparison among the different Query DSL libraries available for using with Java, like: Querydsl , jOOQ , JEQUEL , activejdbc , iciql and etc... Background: I m using Spring JDBC template, but that still required the queries to be written in plain string format. Although I don't have issues in writing the direct queries, but I m concerned having direct dependency on DB table names. I don't want to use any ORM framework like Hibernate or JPA/EclipseLink. I need the raw performance as high as possible (IMO, they are good for more CRUD

I have a large list of identifiers which I would like to add to the WHERE clause like this: identifier IN (..., ..., ..., ...) However, that is pretty slow, because it has to bind each value individually. Remember, the list is pretty long (almost 1000 values). In such case, it is better to use: identifier = ANY({..., ..., ..., ...}) Now, we are only binding the array, just once. I tried doing that in jOOQ: Integer[] values = {..., ..., ..., ...} DSL.any(DSL.array(values)) The following SQL is generated: "identifier" = any (array[?, ?, ?, ...]) TRACE | 2017-08-24 10:02:08,914 | JooqLogger.java

I followed the answer in Is it possible to write a data type Converter to handle postgres JSON columns? to implement the nodeObject converter. Then I tried to use an updatable record to insert a record, I got "org.jooq.exception.SQLDialectNotSupportedException: Type class org.postgresql.util.PGobject is not supported in dialect POSTGRES" exception." How can I solve this? Following is my code: TableRecord r = create.newRecord(TABLE); ObjectNode node = JsonNodeFactory.instance.objectNode(); r.setValue(TABLE.JSON_FIELD, node, new JsonObjectConverter()); r.store(); Lukas Eder Since jOOQ 3.5, you