ioc-container

Namespaces omitted for brevity... I have written the following service provider and registered in config/app.php: class OfferServiceProvider extends ServiceProvider { public function register() { $this->registerLossControlManager(); } protected function registerLossControlManager() { $this->app->bind('LossControlInterface', 'LossControl'); } } Here is my LossControlInterface interface LossControlInterface { /** * @param int $demandId * @param float $offerTotal * @param float $productTotal * @param null|int $partnerId * @return mixed */ public function make($demandId, $offerTotal, $productTotal

I need to get or access to my IoC container in a static class. This is my (simplified) scenario: I register dependencies for ASP .net Web Api in a Startup class (but also I do this for MVC or WCF. I have a DependecyResolver project, but for simplicity, consider the following code) // Web Api project - Startup.cs public void Configuration(IAppBuilder app) { HttpConfiguration config = new HttpConfiguration(); var builder = new ContainerBuilder(); // ... Omited for clarity builder.RegisterAssemblyTypes(AppDomain.CurrentDomain.GetAssemblies()) .AsClosedTypesOf(typeof(IHandle<>))

The documentation states that Autofac supports open generics and I am able to register and resolve in a basic case like so: Registration: builder.RegisterGeneric(typeof(PassThroughFlattener<>)) .As(typeof(IFlattener<>)) .ContainerScoped(); Resolve: var flattener = _container.Resolve<IFlattener<Address>>(); The above code works just fine. However, assuming that I will not know the type provided to IFlattener until runtime, I want to do something like this: object input = new Address(); var flattener = (IFlattener)_container.Resolve(typeof(IFlattener<>), new TypedParameter(typeof(IFlattener<>),

I am about to create a Desktop App (with .NET windows forms) Essentially, I want to create an n-tier app but I also want loose coupling between layers. However, I am not very sure if this is a good approach for windows forms And now I just wonder if it would be really a wise choice to use any IoC (StructureMap, Ninject, Spring.Net), I have used them before for Asp.Net web applications but what makes me doubt now is the fact that working with windows forms my business entities will persist when I navigate through tabs and unlike than web forms or mvc apps where it would be necesary to inject my

I am using Laravel-5.0's default Authentication Middleware, but I changed the signature of the handle function to have: public function handle($request, Closure $next, AuthClientInterface $authClient) I also registered AuthClientInterface in a Service Provider with: public function register() { $this->app->bind('App\Services\Contracts\AuthClientInterface', function() { return new AuthClient( env('AUTH_SERVER_URL'), env('AUTH_SESSION_URL'), env('AUTH_CLIENT_ID') ); }); } However, despite this, I am see the following error: Argument 3 passed to HelioQuote\Http\Middleware\Authenticate::handle()

Here is the example: interface IComponentA {}; class ComponentA : IComponentA { }; interface IComponentB { }; class ComponentB : IComponentB { }; interface IComponentC { }; class ComponentC : IComponentC { public ComponentC(IComponentA a) { Console.WriteLine("Constructor A"); } public ComponentC(IComponentB b) { Console.WriteLine("Constructor B"); } }; All these components are registered in Castle Windsor container. But class ComponentC has 2 overloaded constructors. Any of them can be used when ComponentC is being activated. I need ComponentC(IComponentB b) constructor to be used. For a