init

issue with singleton python call two times __init__

瘦欲@ 提交于 2019-11-29 11:23:00
I have a singleton like this class Singleton: class __impl: def __init__(self): print "INIT" __instance = None def __init__(self): # Check whether we already have an instance if Singleton.__instance is None: Singleton.__instance = Singleton.__impl() # Store instance reference as the only member in the handle self.__dict__['_Singleton__instance'] = Singleton.__instance def __getattr__(self, attr): """ Delegate access to implementation """ return getattr(self.__instance, attr) def __setattr__(self, attr, value): """ Delegate access to implementation """ return setattr(self.__instance, attr,

java方法执行流程解析

*爱你&永不变心* 提交于 2019-11-29 10:07:25
Java程序运行时,必须经过编译和运行两个步骤。首先将后缀名为.java的源文件进行编译,最终生成后缀名为.class的字节码文件。然后Java虚拟机将编译好的字节码文件加载到内存(这个过程被称为类加载,是由加载器完成的),然后虚拟机针对加载到内存的java类进行解释执行,显示结果。 Java的运行原理 在Java中引入了虚拟机的概念,即在机器和编译程序之间加入了一层抽象的虚拟的机器。这台虚拟的机器在任何平台上都提供给编译程序一个的共同的接口。编译程序只需要面向虚拟机,生成虚拟机能够理解的代码,然后由解释器来将虚拟机代码转换为特定系统的机器码执行。在Java中,这种供虚拟机理解的代码叫做字节码(ByteCode),它不面向任何特定的处理器,只面向虚拟机。每一种平台的解释器是不同的,但是实现的虚拟机是相同的。Java源程序经过编译器编译后变成字节码,字节码由虚拟机解释执行,虚拟机将每一条要执行的字节码送给解释器,解释器将其翻译成特定机器上的机器码,然后在特定的机器上运行。 Java代码编译和执行的整个过程 Java代码编译是由Java源码编译器来完成,流程图如下所示: Java字节码的执行是由JVM执行引擎来完成,流程图如下所示: Java代码编译和执行的整个过程包含了以下三个重要的机制: Java源码编译机制 类加载机制 类执行机制 Java源码编译机制 Java

How to initialise a binary semaphore in C

孤人 提交于 2019-11-29 06:50:13
In the man page it appears that even if you initialise a semaphore to a value of one: sem_init(&mySem, 0, 1); It could still be incremented to a value greater than 1 with multiple calls to sem_post(&mySem); But in this code example the comment seems to think differently: sem_init(&mutex, 0, 1); /* initialize mutex to 1 - binary semaphore */ Is it possible to initialise a strictly binary semaphore in C? Note: The reason for doing this instead of using a mutex in this case is the sem_post and sem_wait may be called by different threads. If you want a strictly binary semaphore on Linux, I suggest

Pycharm (Python IDE) doesn't auto complete Django modules

血红的双手。 提交于 2019-11-29 06:11:09
My Python IDE (pycharm) has stopped auto completing my modules (suggestions). I get unresolved references after every django module I try to import so: from django - works, however soon as I add a 'dot' it fails so from django.db import models gives me unresolved errors... The ackward thing is after compiling references DO work. I discovered that all my __init__.py files (everywhere) no longer are marked with python icon and are now notepad icons. Also opening init files in my interpreter gives non-color marked up text (no syntax highlighting). So I think Python doens't recognizes these files.

HttpModule Init method is called several times - why?

拜拜、爱过 提交于 2019-11-29 02:15:37
问题 I was creating a http module and while debugging I noticed something which at first (at least) seemed like weird behaviour. When i set a breakpoint in the init method of the httpmodule i can see that the http module init method is being called several times even though i have only started up the website for debugging and made one single request (sometimes it is hit only 1 time, other times as many as 10 times). I know that I should expect several instances of the HttpApplication to be running

How to enable adbd to listen to a port at boot time in Android?

我怕爱的太早我们不能终老 提交于 2019-11-29 01:30:18
问题 I have a rooted HTC Hero, and what I want to do is to enable the adbd to listen to a port at boot time. I tried some code found here: setprop service.adb.tcp.port 5555 stop adbd start adbd in an Android shell and it works great. I tried to change the init.rc file. I added the above code in init.rc and I replaced it with the original file, through these commands: adb push init.rc sdcard adb shell adb su mount -o rw,remount -t yaffs2 /dev/block/mtdblock3 / adb cp sdcard/init.rc / The file is

Android 属性property_get/property_set

老子叫甜甜 提交于 2019-11-28 22:27:35
每个属性都有一个名称和值,他们都是字符串格式。属性被大量使用在Android系统中,用来记录系统设置或进程之间的信息交换。属性是在整个系统中全局可见的。每个进程可以get/set属性。 在系统初始化时,Android将分配一个共享内存区来存储的属性。这些是由“init”守护进程完成的,其源代码位于:device/system/init。“init”守护进程将启动一个属性服务。 属性服务在“init”守护进程中运行。每一个客户端想要设置属性时,必须连接属性服务,再向其发送信息。属性服务将会在共享内存区中修改和创建属性。任何客户端想获得属性信息,可以从共享内存直接读取。这提高了读取性能。客户端应用程序可以调用libcutils中的API函数以GET/SET属性信息。libcutils的源代码位于:device/libs/cutils。API函数是: int property_get(const char *key, char *value, const char *default_value); int property_set(const char *key, const char *value); 而libcutils又调用libc中的 __system_property_xxx 函数获得共享内存中的属性。libc的源代码位于:device/system/bionic。

iOS loadNibNamed confusion, what is best practice?

六月ゝ 毕业季﹏ 提交于 2019-11-28 20:27:14
I'm familiar with most of the process of creating an XIB for my own UIView subclass, but not everything is working properly for me - it's mostly to do with the IBOutlets linking up. I can get them to work in what seems like a roundabout way. My setup is this: I have MyClass.h and MyClass.m. They have IBOutlets for a UIView (called view) and a UILabel (called myLabel). I added the 'view' property because some examples online seemed to suggest that you need this, and it actually solved an issue where I was getting a crash because it couldn't find the view property, I guess not even in the UIView

Overriding init in subclass

狂风中的少年 提交于 2019-11-28 18:31:26
问题 In Objective-C, is it necessary to override all inherited constructors of a subclass to add custom initialization logic? For example, would the following be correct for a UIView subclass with custom initialization logic? @implementation CustomUIView - (id)init { self = [super init]; if (self) { [self initHelper]; } return self; } - (id)initWithFrame:(CGRect)theFrame { self = [super initWithFrame:theFrame]; if (self) { [self initHelper]; } return self; } - (id)initWithCoder:(NSCoder *)decoder

Best way of preventing other programmers from calling -init

丶灬走出姿态 提交于 2019-11-28 16:26:32
问题 When designing a class hierarchy, sometimes the subclass has added a new initWithSomeNewParam method, and it would be desirable to disable calls to the old init method inherited from the superclass. First of all, I've read the question here, where the proposed alternatives are either override init to throw an exception at runtime, or override and set default values for properties. In my case, I don't wan't to provide default values, and I want to clearly indicate that the old method should