inequalities

Solve a system of linear equations and linear inequalities

血红的双手。 提交于 2020-01-13 07:21:27
问题 I have to get the min and max y for a linear expression, restricted by some linear inequalities in python. You can see the equation and inequalities here that I have entered into Desmos: 3x+12y = 1000 x > 30 x < 160 y < 60 y > 10 x + y > 180 I can solve them by hand by drawing and crossing out the inequalities. But I cannot do that in Python. What I have tried so far in Python is to get y=83.33 when x=0; x=333.33 when y=0; After getting the min and max x,y I then apply the inequalities 1 by 1

Solve a system of linear equations and linear inequalities

雨燕双飞 提交于 2020-01-13 07:21:10
问题 I have to get the min and max y for a linear expression, restricted by some linear inequalities in python. You can see the equation and inequalities here that I have entered into Desmos: 3x+12y = 1000 x > 30 x < 160 y < 60 y > 10 x + y > 180 I can solve them by hand by drawing and crossing out the inequalities. But I cannot do that in Python. What I have tried so far in Python is to get y=83.33 when x=0; x=333.33 when y=0; After getting the min and max x,y I then apply the inequalities 1 by 1

Multiple Inequalities in Ruby

人走茶凉 提交于 2019-12-19 10:45:11
问题 Complete ruby noob. I have a value which I want to check against several numbers (1,4,7) and if it equals any of them, return false. right now I'm using: if $my_variable_class[1] != 1 && $my_variable_class[1] != 4 && $my_variable_class[1] != 7 I've got a shit-ton of numbers to check for inequality against. Is there a more efficient way to handle this? 回答1: Maybe unless [1,4,7].include?($my_variable[1]) will do the trick? 回答2: unless [1,4,7].include? $my_variable[1] do_smth end 来源: https:/

how to plot 3d inequalities on matlab

懵懂的女人 提交于 2019-12-18 07:21:02
问题 I want to plot a 3d region in MATLAB bounded from a set of inequalities. For example: 0 <= x <= 1 sqrt(x) <= y <= 1 0 <= z <= 1 - y I found a 2d example that someone has done on this site but I'm not sure how to convert that to 3d. How to plot inequalities. Edit: From @Tobold's help I modified the code to restrict the points that are plotted to those that are defined by all three regions, but it plots only 2 or 3 points. It looks like the points in the vectors X1, Y1 and Z1 are right but for

jQuery: Selecting all elements where attribute is greater than a value

穿精又带淫゛_ 提交于 2019-12-17 04:01:13
问题 I know that to filter an element with an atttribute called attrName which has value attrValue I do: filter("[attrName='attrValue']") but looking at the docs http://api.jquery.com/category/selectors/ I can't see an option to select all elements s.t. attrName>attrValue Will this work filter("[attrName>'attrValue']") 回答1: You can do this using the function overload of .filter(), like this: .filter(function() { return $(this).attr("attrName") > "someValue"; }) 回答2: The solution is jQuery.filter()

What is the operator precedence when writing a double inequality in Python (explicitly in the code, and how can this be overridden for arrays?)

坚强是说给别人听的谎言 提交于 2019-12-10 02:11:37
问题 What is the specific code, in order, being executed when I ask for something like >>> 1 <= 3 >= 2 True If both have equal precedence and it's just the order of their evaluation, why does the second inequality function as (3 >= 2) instead of (True >= 2) Consider for example the difference between these >>> (1 < 3) < 2 True >>> 1 < 3 < 2 False Is it just a pure syntactical short-cut hard-coded into Python to expand the second as the and of the two statements? Could I change this behavior for a

Solving a system of (more than two) linear inequalities

ε祈祈猫儿з 提交于 2019-12-07 13:59:31
问题 If I use diophantine(2*x+3*y-5*z-77) I receive this result. {(t_0, -9*t_0 - 5*t_1 + 154, -5*t_0 - 3*t_1 + 77)} Fine so far. However, on occasion one might like to constrain x, y and z to be (say) non-negative. When I use an approach like this< reduce_inequalities([0<=t_0, 0<=-9*t_0 - 5*t_1 + 154, 0<=-5*t_0 - 3*t_1 + 77],[t_0, t_1]) I get: NotImplementedError: inequality has more than one symbol of interest Does sympy, sage, prolog, haskell or some other freely available product have means for

Solving a system of (more than two) linear inequalities

半世苍凉 提交于 2019-12-05 18:49:08
If I use diophantine(2*x+3*y-5*z-77) I receive this result. {(t_0, -9*t_0 - 5*t_1 + 154, -5*t_0 - 3*t_1 + 77)} Fine so far. However, on occasion one might like to constrain x, y and z to be (say) non-negative. When I use an approach like this< reduce_inequalities([0<=t_0, 0<=-9*t_0 - 5*t_1 + 154, 0<=-5*t_0 - 3*t_1 + 77],[t_0, t_1]) I get: NotImplementedError: inequality has more than one symbol of interest Does sympy, sage, prolog, haskell or some other freely available product have means for solving systems of linear inequalities that arise in this way. Thank you! To reason about integers in

What is the operator precedence when writing a double inequality in Python (explicitly in the code, and how can this be overridden for arrays?)

天涯浪子 提交于 2019-12-05 01:38:33
What is the specific code, in order, being executed when I ask for something like >>> 1 <= 3 >= 2 True If both have equal precedence and it's just the order of their evaluation, why does the second inequality function as (3 >= 2) instead of (True >= 2) Consider for example the difference between these >>> (1 < 3) < 2 True >>> 1 < 3 < 2 False Is it just a pure syntactical short-cut hard-coded into Python to expand the second as the and of the two statements? Could I change this behavior for a class, such that a <= b <= c gets expanded to something different? It's looking like the following is

jQuery: Selecting all elements where attribute is greater than a value

一世执手 提交于 2019-11-26 17:41:04
I know that to filter an element with an atttribute called attrName which has value attrValue I do: filter("[attrName='attrValue']") but looking at the docs http://api.jquery.com/category/selectors/ I can't see an option to select all elements s.t. attrName>attrValue Will this work filter("[attrName>'attrValue']") You can do this using the function overload of .filter() , like this: .filter(function() { return $(this).attr("attrName") > "someValue"; }) The solution is jQuery.filter() : $("selector").filter(function() { return $(this).attr("my-attr") > 123; }); Be careful, if you are playing