go-to-definition

“Go to definition” from PyDev not work in External Library files

放肆的年华 提交于 2021-01-28 16:44:58
问题 When I am in certain files, for example, External Library files, I am getting this behavior where the Go To Definition command jumps me to the import statement at the top of the file instead of opening the file with the real definition. For example, I'm in an external library, (jumped here using Go To Definition), and from here, I again want to jump, so I put the cursor on the return statement on the Something token and hit "Go To Definition"... from external.library.mod import Something ...

“Go to definition” from PyDev not work in External Library files

北城余情 提交于 2021-01-28 16:43:28
问题 When I am in certain files, for example, External Library files, I am getting this behavior where the Go To Definition command jumps me to the import statement at the top of the file instead of opening the file with the real definition. For example, I'm in an external library, (jumped here using Go To Definition), and from here, I again want to jump, so I put the cursor on the return statement on the Something token and hit "Go To Definition"... from external.library.mod import Something ...

Visual studio 2019 go to definition and Intellisense not working

淺唱寂寞╮ 提交于 2020-06-16 05:58:25
问题 I have noticed a weird issue with Visual Studio 2019 v16.0.1 the IntelliSense about "Using directive is unnecessary" normally grey is missing and type reference suggestion for missing using is not working. I also tried with Visual Studio 2019 Preview but no luck. I have tried the following: deleted .vs folder and restarted. Reinstalled Visual Studio Reset settings via import and export setting under tools Any other suggestions will be appreciated. 回答1: Go to Tools -> Options -> Text Editor ->

Visual studio 2019 go to definition and Intellisense not working

我的未来我决定 提交于 2020-06-16 05:58:19
问题 I have noticed a weird issue with Visual Studio 2019 v16.0.1 the IntelliSense about "Using directive is unnecessary" normally grey is missing and type reference suggestion for missing using is not working. I also tried with Visual Studio 2019 Preview but no luck. I have tried the following: deleted .vs folder and restarted. Reinstalled Visual Studio Reset settings via import and export setting under tools Any other suggestions will be appreciated. 回答1: Go to Tools -> Options -> Text Editor ->

Visual Studio - I want “Go To Definition” to open Object Browser, not “metadata”

纵饮孤独 提交于 2019-12-31 12:40:15
问题 In Visual Studio version 2002 and 2003 "Go To Definition" would find the selected type or member in the Object Browser. In 2005 onwards it opens a source window "generated from metadata" instead. How do I configure these newer versions to go to Object Browser? (In other words, I have the opposite problem to this one.) Installing ReSharper makes this change, so I know it must be possible, but how do I do it without ReSharper? 回答1: As workaround you can create the following macro: Sub

Go to definition from text position with roslyn

早过忘川 提交于 2019-12-10 12:13:45
问题 How to get file name and position of definition of any symbol under the current custom position and file (within project or solution)? I do the following steps (simplified explanation): Create collection of syntax trees and compilation by the following way: SyntaxTrees = new List<SyntaxTree>(); foreach (var file in projectFiles) syntaxTrees.Add(SyntaxTree.ParseText(File.ReadAllText(file)); Compilation = Compilation.Create("temp.cs", null, SyntaxTrees, new MetadataReference[] { mscorlib });

Difference between Goto Definition and Goto Implementation in Visual Studio

妖精的绣舞 提交于 2019-12-05 14:50:45
问题 What is the difference between Go To Definition and Go To Implementation in Visual Studio? Version: Visual Studio 2015 Update 1 回答1: Let's say we have this interface: public interface IEmailSender { Task SendEmailAsync(string email, string subject, string message); } And a class that implements this interface: public class AuthMessageSender : IEmailSender { public Task SendEmailAsync(string email, string subject, string message) { // Plug in your email service here to send an email. return

How can I turn “Object Browser” to “Metadata” for “Go to definition” in Visual Studio 2010?

笑着哭i 提交于 2019-12-03 06:28:33
问题 Before installing Resharper, Ctrl + Left Click for Go to definition , Visual Studio 2010 uses to Metadata . After the install Resharper , when I try to first time Ctrl + Left Click, Resharper asked me with popup where I want to go, I click Object Browser for testing. Now I want to get back this setting, but in Resharper , there is only one option for this; ReSharper | Options -> Environment | Search & Navigation and turning off or on Go to declaration on Ctrl + Left click in editor But If I

How can I turn “Object Browser” to “Metadata” for “Go to definition” in Visual Studio 2010?

青春壹個敷衍的年華 提交于 2019-12-02 19:59:36
Before installing Resharper, Ctrl + Left Click for Go to definition , Visual Studio 2010 uses to Metadata . After the install Resharper , when I try to first time Ctrl + Left Click, Resharper asked me with popup where I want to go, I click Object Browser for testing. Now I want to get back this setting, but in Resharper , there is only one option for this; ReSharper | Options -> Environment | Search & Navigation and turning off or on Go to declaration on Ctrl + Left click in editor But If I turned off this setting, It doesn't take back this setting to Metadata . It still goes to Object Browser

Go to Definition of class only showing public members

≯℡__Kan透↙ 提交于 2019-12-01 13:49:00
When I right click on a class (that is part of an third party assembly - not code I have written) in Visual Studio and select "Go to Definition", I can see all the methods, properties etc of the class. I notice all these are all public and no private (or any other level of access) members are shown. Does this feature only show public members of the class? You can find the answer on the doc page : When you try to run the Go To Definition or Peek Definition command for types or members that are marked as internal, Visual Studio does not display their metadata as source code, regardless of