git-pull

There is no tracking information for the current branch

时光怂恿深爱的人放手 提交于 2019-11-27 09:55:54
I've been using github from a relatively short period, and I've always used the client to perform commits and pulls. I decided to try it from the git bash yesterday, and I successfully created a new repo and committed files. Today I did changes to the repository from another computer, I've committed the changes and now I'm back home and performed a git pull to update my local version and I get this: There is no tracking information for the current branch. Please specify which branch you want to merge with. See git-pull(1) for details git pull <remote> <branch> If you wish to set tracking

Updating forked GitHub repo to match original's latest code and commits

纵然是瞬间 提交于 2019-11-27 09:53:43
问题 I forked a GitHub project several days ago and from its issues, I can see that the master branch has had some modifications since. When I cd to my location directory of this project and use git pull , it says, "Already up-to-date". Why? How do I update my fork to include the commits from the original repo? 回答1: When you fork a repository, a copy of the original repository is established on your GitHub account. This permits read+write access to the "copy". When the original repository resource

Merge, update, and pull Git branches without using checkouts

时间秒杀一切 提交于 2019-11-27 09:39:41
I work on a project that has 2 branches, A and B. I typically work on branch A, and merge stuff from branch B. For the merging, I would typically do: git merge origin/branchB However, I would also like to keep a local copy of branch B, as I may occasionally check out the branch without first merging with my branch A. For this, I would do: git checkout branchB git pull git checkout branchA Is there a way to do the above in one command, and without having to switch branch back and forth? Should I be using git update-ref for that? How? The Short Answer As long as you're doing a fast-forward merge

git push rejected: error: failed to push some refs

99封情书 提交于 2019-11-27 09:12:38
问题 I know people have asked similar questions, but I believe the causes of their problems to be different. I did a hard reset because I had messed up my code pretty bad git reset --hard 41651df8fc9 I've made quite some changes, I've made some commits and now that I'm trying to push all these commits into the server I get the following error: ! [rejected] master -> master (non-fast-forward) error: failed to push some refs to 'git@git.somewhere.git' Git suggests to do a git pull and that's what

How do I force git pull to overwrite everything on every pull?

我是研究僧i 提交于 2019-11-27 08:55:29
问题 I have a CENTRAL bare repository that has three developer repositories pulling and pushing to it normally. I also have two other repositories that pull from the CENTRAL bare repo: one is the live server, and the other is a test/stage server—each pulling from its own respective branch. The scenario is this: I have a post-update hook script on the CENTRAL repo that automatically accesses the test and live repos and runs a pull command on each. This updates both test and live servers, all

Is it possible to pull just one file in Git?

白昼怎懂夜的黑 提交于 2019-11-27 05:49:30
I am working on a Git branch that has some broken tests, and I would like to pull (merge changes, not just overwrite) these tests from another branch where they are already fixed. I know I can do git pull origin that_other_branch but this will attempt to merge lots of other files, for that I am not yet ready. Is it possible to pull and merge only the specified file (and not everything) from that another branch? This is not a duplicate of Git pull request for just one file as all answers to that question are how to revert the locally changed file to the repository version, without changing any

How to pull remote branch from somebody else's repo

拟墨画扇 提交于 2019-11-27 05:44:42
I've got a project hosted on GitHub which somebody has forked. On their fork, they've created a new branch "foo" and made some changes. How do I pull their "foo" into a new branch also named "foo" in my repo? I understand they could submit a pull request to me, but I'd like to initiate this process myself. Assume the following: Because they forked my project, both our repos share the same 'history' Although GitHub shows their project was forked from mine, my local repository doesn't have any references to this person's project. Do I need to add theirs as a remote? I don't have a branch called

How can I pull an existing heroku app to new location for development?

∥☆過路亽.° 提交于 2019-11-27 05:00:09
问题 I currently have the latest version of my code on another computer that I want to develop from (Home computer and laptop for when I'm out and about) I set up heroku for my app on my laptop. Now I need to associate my code on my desktop so that I can push to heroku from there as well. This is what I get from my desktop: desktop:~/NetBeansProjects/onlinescheduler$ git pull heroku master fatal: 'heroku' does not appear to be a git repository fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly I can't do

You asked me to pull without telling me which branch you want to merge with

Deadly 提交于 2019-11-27 04:58:27
问题 TL;DR: I have a "tracked" branch that I can't pull. So here I am in "bucket-4": $ git branch -v bucket-1 410f7b5 * gh-53 * gh-48 * "Share App" bucket-2 7ed70a2 * upgrade to SOLR 3.3.0 bucket-3 400ffe4 * emergency fix prod issue * bucket-4 64c2414 Merge branch 'bucket-3' into bucket-4 master 8dc4854 [ahead 1] * gh-73 I'd like to pull in changes from my remote: $ git pull You asked me to pull without telling me which branch you want to merge with, and 'branch.bucket-4.merge' in your

How can I make my local repository available for git-pull?

十年热恋 提交于 2019-11-27 02:48:31
I have a working copy repository that I've been working in no problem; the origin for this repository is on GitHub. I'd like to make my working copy repository available as the origin for my build machine (a VM on another physical host), so that commits I make to my working copy can be built and tested on the build machine without having to go via GitHub first. I already have a build for the GitHub repository going, but I'd like this to be a "golden" repository/build; i.e., if something goes in there, the build against GitHub should be guaranteed to pass. I've looked at the documentation on