git-cherry-pick | 易学教程

How to retroactively add commits to a Git repository?

阅读更多关于 How to retroactively add commits to a Git repository?

问题 I am creating a module that ports a third party lib to another platform. The version of my module matches the version of the lib that it wraps. For the purposes of this question, let's say that the lib is on version 10, therefore my module is also on version 10. Git refs look like this: master === HEAD === v10 (tag) However, for compatibility reasons, I wish to create versions 8 and 9 of the wrapper as well. If I commit v9 , it will become the new HEAD , but I want HEAD to stay on v10 . I

What are the perils of cherry picking in git between two branches A and B if I am never going to merge between them?

阅读更多关于 What are the perils of cherry picking in git between two branches A and B if I am never going to merge between them?

问题 I have read the excellent series of posts by Raymond Chen titled Stop cherry-picking, start merging And I totally understand that cherry-picking is evil if we are going to merge the branches afterwards . But suppose I never merge the two branches. Are there any perils of cherry-picking in this case? 回答1: Not exactly "none", but low risk. The only issue remains to pick up a change depending on another change that is not cherry-picked: the resulting merge would not work in the destination

How to cherry pick commits after they've been reverted?

阅读更多关于 How to cherry pick commits after they've been reverted?

问题 I was working on my feature branch and after review, merged it into development to be deployed. Later, a coworker decided to do a release and merged his and mine into master . While deploying he realized his code was buggy and reverted master . In our fork-and-pull flow, that means that now development and master are both reverted. When I came in this morning, I rebased from development per usual, to learn afterward there had been a revert. Now I'm trying to cherry-pick my work from the

Why does git show a conflict between two apparently identical added files?

阅读更多关于 Why does git show a conflict between two apparently identical added files?

问题 I have a project that was started in TFS, then moved to Git. Unfortunately, the guy who moved it to Git just checked in the current files instead of using git-tfs. I'm trying to rebase his new commits in Git on top of the commits I pulled from TFS using git-tfs. To do this, I'm simply rebasing his commits on top of the git-tfs commits. (I realize this will mess up remote Git branches, but we're a small team and it'll be OK. I've also tried cherry-picking instead but I hit the same problem.)

Why does cherry-pick tell me that I have all lines changed?

阅读更多关于 Why does cherry-pick tell me that I have all lines changed?

Updated Consider file abc, identical in both commits A and B begin 123 456 789 klm end In A, we refactor first line 123 => AAA and pick B on top of the result. Git tells that all lines in the file have changed . Its diff will operate normally however, if we modify B by updating any single line. Git will notice that only this one line of text has changed in this case, reporting a single-line conflict if it was the first line also. Here is the code to reproduce mkdir full-shit ; cd full-shit git init ; echo rrr > root ; git add root git commit -m root git checkout -b A ; git checkout -b B

How to cherry pick commits after they've been reverted?

阅读更多关于 How to cherry pick commits after they've been reverted?

I was working on my feature branch and after review, merged it into development to be deployed. Later, a coworker decided to do a release and merged his and mine into master . While deploying he realized his code was buggy and reverted master . In our fork-and-pull flow, that means that now development and master are both reverted. When I came in this morning, I rebased from development per usual, to learn afterward there had been a revert. Now I'm trying to cherry-pick my work from the original feature branch only to realize it gives me "empty commit messages" because of the revert. is this

git rebase vs git cherry-pick of detached branch

阅读更多关于 git rebase vs git cherry-pick of detached branch

问题 I have two branches: master tmp tmp branch is detached I need to put tmp branch on top of master with resolving conflicts in priority of tmp When I do git checkout tmp git rebase --strategy=recursive -X theirs master I got error First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it... fatal: Could not parse object '0a722ac51071ecb4d00b1ef45384aac227b942a0^' Unknown exit code (128) from command: git-merge-recursive 0a722ac51071ecb4d00b1ef45384aac227b942a0^ -- HEAD

How to git cherrypick all changes introduced in specific branch

阅读更多关于 How to git cherrypick all changes introduced in specific branch

问题 Background info: Due to restrictions in workflow with out existing systems, we need to set up a somewhat unorthodox git process. (patch) A-B---F | | (hotfix) C-D-E | (dev) 1-2-3-G On the patch branch, there are some commits. The files here are similar but not identical to the ones on dev (sync scripts switch around the order of settings in many of the files, making them appear changed while they are functionally the same). A fix is needed on this branch so a hotfix branch is created and

Why is git log --cherry-pick not removing equivalent commits?

阅读更多关于 Why is git log --cherry-pick not removing equivalent commits?

问题 I have been trying to use git log --no-merges --cherry-pick --right-only master...my-branch to generate a list of commits that are in the my-branch, but not in master (as per the git-log documentation). However, there are still many equivalent commits that are coming up in the list. If I show them and their patches, there is no difference apart from the commit id. git show 16cbd0e47406a4f7acbd6dc13f02d74d0b6a7621 >patcha git show c53c7c32dcd84bfa7096a50b27738458e84536d5 >patchb diff patcha

git merge --no-commit vs git cherry-pick --no-commit

阅读更多关于 git merge --no-commit vs git cherry-pick --no-commit

问题 Is there any difference between git merge --no-commit and git cherry-pick --no-commit ? And is there any difference in history if I commit after these two commands? 回答1: If you commit after git merge --no-commit , you'll actually get a merge commit. Whereas after a git cherry-pick --no-commit you'll get a commit with a single parent. Hence, yes, there is a difference between those two commands. In particular if you have something like A -- B -- C \ L HEAD \ -- D -- E If you cherry-pick commit