getter

Using @property decorator on dicts

一个人想着一个人 提交于 2019-11-27 13:46:49
I'm trying to use Python's @property decorator on a dict in a class. The idea is that I want a certain value (call it 'message') to be cleared after it is accessed. But I also want another value (call it 'last_message') to contain the last set message, and keep it until another message is set. In my mind, this code would work: >>> class A(object): ... def __init__(self): ... self._b = {"message": "", ... "last_message": ""} ... @property ... def b(self): ... b = self._b ... self._b["message"] = "" ... return b ... @b.setter ... def b(self, value): ... self._b = value ... self._b["last_message"

Lazy getter doesn't work in classes

旧街凉风 提交于 2019-11-27 09:31:27
class a { get b() { delete this.b; return this.b = 1; } } var c = { get b() { delete this.b; return this.b = 1; } } console.log(c.b); // works as expected console.log((new a()).b); // throws error The above code should work fine but the last line throws. Uncaught TypeError: Cannot set property b of # which has only a getter(…) Clearly the getter is not being deleted in class whereas it works fine in object. I am on latest stable chrome. Lazy Getter MDN Entry The getter of the class sits on the .prototype object, not on this , that's why your attempt to delete it fails (and, as Jeremy points

How can I define a default getter and setter using ECMAScript 5?

拟墨画扇 提交于 2019-11-27 07:42:08
问题 How can I specify a default getter for a prototype? With default getter I mean a function that is called if obj.undefinedProperty123 is called. I tried Object.prototype.get = function(property) {..} but this is not called in this case. 回答1: In ECMAScript 5, you can only intercept get/set operations on specific named properties (not universally all properties) via Object.defineProperty: Object.defineProperty(someObj, "someProp", { get: function() { console.log("you tried to get someObj

Getter/setter on javascript array?

最后都变了- 提交于 2019-11-27 06:49:10
Is there a way to get a get/set behaviour on an array? I imagine something like this: var arr = ['one', 'two', 'three']; var _arr = new Array(); for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) { arr[i].__defineGetter__('value', function (index) { //Do something return _arr[index]; }); arr[i].__defineSetter__('value', function (index, val) { //Do something _arr[index] = val; }); } Array access is no different to normal property access. array[0] means array['0'] , so you can define a property with name '0' and intercept access to the first array item through that. However, that does make it impractical for

Swift 4.2 Setter Getter, All paths through this function will call itself

巧了我就是萌 提交于 2019-11-27 06:40:59
问题 With swift 4.2 I have begun to see a lot of issues, and one of them i'm not really sure how to resolve, since my getter method should be returning the value itself. I imagine what is happening is that the getter will attempt to access the getter when calling self.type How can i resolve this issue? Here is a screenshot of the code with the error. Thanks in advance Here is the written code @objc var type: DecisionType { set { if(newValue == DecisionType.DecisionDouble){ //Yes button and NO

How does EL #{bean.id} call managed bean method bean.getId()

删除回忆录丶 提交于 2019-11-27 06:32:25
问题 I do not really understand how getter and setter work althougth it is a basic concept. I have the following code, how is the attribute id sent to Managed Bean? Is it captured by getter method? My facelet <p:inputText id="id" value="#{bean.id}"> My managed bean private String id; public void setId(String id) { this.id = id; } public String getId() { return id; } 回答1: The call of getter and setter methods by #{} expressions is not part of JSF but Expression Language (most known as EL). JSF

What are the benefits of using properties internally?

蹲街弑〆低调 提交于 2019-11-27 06:17:12
问题 Encapsulation is obviously helpful and essential when accessing members from outside the class, but when referring to class variables internally, is it better to call their private members, or use their getters? If your getter simply returns the variable, is there any performance difference ? 回答1: There shouldn't be a significant performance difference, and the reason you stick to using the properties is because that's the whole point of encapsulation. It keeps all accesses of those private

Why is the getter called so many times by the rendered attribute?

家住魔仙堡 提交于 2019-11-27 05:01:35
Related to a previous example, i tried to monitor my get/set methods on the server (when they are called, and how often). So, my actual been look such : @ManagedBean(name="selector") @RequestScoped public class Selector { @ManagedProperty(value="#{param.profilePage}") private String profilePage; public String getProfilePage() { if(profilePage==null || profilePage.trim().isEmpty()) { this.profilePage="main"; } System.out.println("GET "+profilePage); return profilePage; } public void setProfilePage(String profilePage) { this.profilePage=profilePage; System.out.println("SET "+profilePage); } }

How to generate getters and setters in Visual Studio?

生来就可爱ヽ(ⅴ<●) 提交于 2019-11-27 04:57:13
问题 By "generate", I mean auto-generation of the code necessary for a particuliar selected (set of) variable(s). But any more explicit explication or comment on good practice is welcome. 回答1: Rather than using ctrl + k , x you can also just type prop and then hit tab twice 回答2: Visual Studio also has a feature that will generate a Property from a private variable. If you right-click on a variable, in the context menu that pops up click on the "Refactor" item. Then choose encapsulate field. This

C# getters, setters declaration [duplicate]

风流意气都作罢 提交于 2019-11-27 04:37:24
问题 Possible Duplicates: Why use getters and setters? C# 3.0 Auto-Properties - useful or not? Is there a difference between defining properties the following way - // private, with getter & setter private string fName; public string Name { get { return this.fName } set { this.fName = value } } // define as a Property public string Name { get; set;} As far as I can tell, it only looks like a stylistic preference. Am I missing something? 回答1: Differences: The second form will only compile with a C#