getter

Post Java-14 getter/setter naming convention

倖福魔咒の 提交于 2020-05-08 07:19:07
问题 Java 14 introduced records feature. Record creates getter with the same name as field, so one would write print(person.name()) for example. But old Java bean convention dictates that one should name this method as getName() . Using both styles in the same code base does not look very nice. Migrating everything to records is not possible, as they are too limited to replace all use-cases. Is there any official or semi-official guidelines how to name getters and setters after Java 14 in new code

Post Java-14 getter/setter naming convention

三世轮回 提交于 2020-05-08 07:19:02
问题 Java 14 introduced records feature. Record creates getter with the same name as field, so one would write print(person.name()) for example. But old Java bean convention dictates that one should name this method as getName() . Using both styles in the same code base does not look very nice. Migrating everything to records is not possible, as they are too limited to replace all use-cases. Is there any official or semi-official guidelines how to name getters and setters after Java 14 in new code

SonarQube ignore getter/setters in code analysis

断了今生、忘了曾经 提交于 2020-03-18 17:50:09
问题 Is there a setting in SonarQube dashboard that allows for ignoring getter and setters? This sounds like a better option then coding //nopmd on every method in your codebase. My codebase has a lot of them and they are dramatically lowering my unit test coverage % being reported in the Sonarqube dashboard 回答1: There is no option to ignore getters and setters. However, if you have classes you'd like omitted entirely from coverage calculations, you can easily do so with exclusions. 来源: https:/

SonarQube ignore getter/setters in code analysis

廉价感情. 提交于 2020-03-18 17:48:41
问题 Is there a setting in SonarQube dashboard that allows for ignoring getter and setters? This sounds like a better option then coding //nopmd on every method in your codebase. My codebase has a lot of them and they are dramatically lowering my unit test coverage % being reported in the Sonarqube dashboard 回答1: There is no option to ignore getters and setters. However, if you have classes you'd like omitted entirely from coverage calculations, you can easily do so with exclusions. 来源: https:/

Scala学习之类和属性篇(五):getter和setter方法

China☆狼群 提交于 2020-03-01 12:13:09
Scala会根据你定义属性时候使用的关键字:var,val,private来选择是否自动生成 getter 和 setter 方法。并且不允许你重写Scala的 setter 和 getter 方法。如果你要重写这两个方法你会看到如下编译错误: scala> :paste // Entering paste mode (ctrl-D to finish) class Person(private var name: String) { def name = name def name_=(aName: String) {name = aName} } // Exiting paste mode, now interpreting. <console>:12: error: overloaded method name needs result type def name = name ^ <console>:13: error: method name_= is defined twice conflicting symbols both originated in file '<console>' def name_=(aName: String) {name = aName} ^ Scala默认对于 Person 类的 name 属性,自动生成的 getter 和 setter

In YamlDotNet, how can I deserialize a getter-only property?

天涯浪子 提交于 2020-02-06 08:49:55
问题 I would like to serialize/deserialize objects that have readonly private fields with public getter-only properties, whose readonly fields are set in the objects' constructor. However, the following code fails in unit testing: using System.ComponentModel; using FluentAssertions; using Xunit; using YamlDotNet.Serialization; namespace Utilities.ComputerInventory { public class CPU { readonly CPUMaker cPUMaker; public CPU() : this(CPUMaker.Generic) { } public CPU(CPUMaker cPUMaker) { this

Passing Argument to JavaScript Object Getter

对着背影说爱祢 提交于 2020-01-22 09:28:21
问题 var URIController = { get href() { return url.location.href; } } I have above object structure. But URIController.href property depends on another object, url . If the url is defined globally, URIController.href works. But I want to pass url object to href getter manually. var URIController = { get href(url) { return url.location.href; } } Changed the getter to accept url parameter but URIController.href(url) throws error because href is not a function. Is it possible to pass arguments to

Only one getter works on the page after uploading to the server

人盡茶涼 提交于 2020-01-15 08:42:14
问题 I have a web site working on Struts2 framework. It works fine on my local computer, but when I've uploaded it to the remote server (hosting) some getters and setters became not calling. For example: Action: ForecastAction.java JSP: forecast.jsp This is forecast.jsp <%@ page contentType="text/html;charset=UTF-8" language="java" %> <%@ taglib prefix="s" uri="/struts-tags" %> <!DOCTYPE html> ... <span><s:property value="day" /></span> <span><s:property value="month" /></span> <span class="week

Jackson Not Overriding Getter with @JsonProperty

我只是一个虾纸丫 提交于 2020-01-14 07:09:29
问题 JsonProperty isn't overriding the default name jackson gets from the getter. If I serialize the class below with ObjectMapper and jackson I get {"hi":"hello"} As you can see the JsonProperty annotation has no effect class JacksonTester { String hi; @JsonProperty("hello") public String getHi() { return hi; } } Putting @JsonProperty on the String itself doesn't work either. The only way it seems that I can change the name is by renaming the getter, the only problem is that it then will always

PHP Setters/Getters and Constructor

眉间皱痕 提交于 2020-01-12 19:36:10
问题 I have been searching for this online, but I can't seem to find something that is clear enough for me to understand. I have seen "similiar" questions on here about this in Java. class animal{ private $name; // traditional setters and getters public function setName($name){ $this->name = $name; } public function getName(){ return $this->name; } // animal constructors function __construct(){ // some code here } // vs function __construct($name){ $this->name = $name; echo $this->name; } } $dog =