getter-setter

Rails: How to make available parent attribute in setter method

邮差的信 提交于 2019-12-05 22:05:16
Context: I have a company model with many projects , having many tasks . The company also has many employees , which in turn have many tasks . Schema: Problem: I'm building a form to create a project where the user can add multiple tasks . Upon submission the form should create a single project record, one or more task records with hours and employee_id attributes and (!) check if the employee name already exists in the database or create a new one. I've approached this by adding jquery autocomplete to the form and defining a virtual attribute with a getter and setter method in my Task model.

Clarication needed for implementing properties with the revealing module pattern using Html5 getters and setters

纵饮孤独 提交于 2019-12-05 20:49:10
I've searched a lot for how to do properties in Javascript. Most all of the revealing module pattern I've seen has exclusively exposed functions, and from experience I know if I expose an object, I'm only really getting a copy of the value right there and then, thus simply I could have a function getMyThing() and setMyThing and expose that. However I'm wanting to expose real properties I've seen the oldschool defineGetter which I'm avoiding and the newer Object.defineProperty( which I had some real troubles with. (I could easily use it against an artitary object but not THIS inside my "module"

what is the use of getter and setter method? [duplicate]

给你一囗甜甜゛ 提交于 2019-12-05 18:16:06
This question already has answers here : Closed 7 years ago . Possible Duplicate: Why use getters and setters? Can anyone tell me what is the use of getter/setter method? In one of the interview someone asked me to write a simple class...so, I wrote the class as shown below: class X { int i; public: void set(int ii){ i = ii;} int get(){ return i;} }; Now, The question goes like this: Q1. Why did you declare the variable 'i' as private and not as public? My answer: Bcoz, data is always sensitive and by declaring it private you'll prevent it from being exposed to the outside world. To counter my

DDD and the use of Getters and Setters

为君一笑 提交于 2019-12-05 17:45:26
问题 I've read a few articles/posts regarding the use of Getters and Setters, and how they help to defeat the purpose of encapsulation in domain model objects. I understand the logic behind not using setters - you are allowing client code to manipulate attributes of that object, outside the context of the object business rules and invariants. Now this principal does still confuse me. For example, what happens if I need to change the value of a member variable of an object? For example, if the name

Can IntelliJ generate getters without the “get” prefix?

◇◆丶佛笑我妖孽 提交于 2019-12-05 16:53:10
问题 IntelliJ has the cool feature to generate Java getters. For example, for a field private final String foo , it will generate a getter getFoo() . Is there any way I can configure IntelliJ to generate getters in the format String foo() ? I am working mainly with immutable objects and prefer this syntax. 回答1: Neat question! Just to clarify @Danny Dan's answer since IntelliJ 15 has been released... To set this up: Alt + Insert Select Getter Open the template configuration from '...' on the RHS

How can I get console.log to output the getter result instead of the string “[Getter/Setter]”?

℡╲_俬逩灬. 提交于 2019-12-05 15:05:48
问题 In this code: function Cls() { this._id = 0; Object.defineProperty(this, 'id', { get: function() { return this._id; }, set: function(id) { this._id = id; }, enumerable: true }); }; var obj = new Cls(); obj.id = 123; console.log(obj); console.log(obj.id); I would like to get { _id: 123, id: 123 } but instead I get { _id: 123, id: [Getter/Setter] } Is there a way to have the getter value be used by the console.log function? 回答1: You can use console.log(Object.assign({}, obj)); 回答2: Use console

Flex: Help me understand data Binding on getters and setters

試著忘記壹切 提交于 2019-12-05 13:22:28
Help me understand data Binding When I create a variable in a class: [Bindable] private var _name:String; and then generate getters and setters, I get: private var _name:String; [Bindable] public function get name():String { return _name; } public function set name(value:String):void { _name = value; } Why does it generate the tag '[Bindable]' only on the get function? To me, it would seem that it should be on the set function, as I would want to know when the value changes, not when the value is just read. What might help to understand what is going on here is the code that the MXML compiler

dynamic getter and setters - a possibility

三世轮回 提交于 2019-12-05 08:10:34
I am trying to solve a problem that came to my mind lately. Let's say we would want and would know how to make a point in having dynamic getters and setters in javascript, more like those in php (__get, __set). But as javascript does not have a catch-all property the only thing we could do is to provide a list of possible keys and iterate to add getters and setters on those only, and hope none other will ever come. But the problem is not by far solved. So the next approach that came to my mind was to use a nasty hack with try and catch , so anytime a name would be undefined in an object to use

How to use get/set methods?

佐手、 提交于 2019-12-05 07:21:07
问题 Please point where a bug in my code. class Foo: def get(self): return self.a def set(self, a): self.a = a Foo.set(10) Foo.get() TypeError: set() takes exactly 2 positional arguments (1 given) How to use __get__() / __set__() ? 回答1: They are instance methods. You have to create an instance of Foo first: f = Foo() f.set(10) f.get() # Returns 10 回答2: How to use __get__()/__set__() ? Like this if you have Python3. Descriptors in Python2.6 doesn't want works properly for me. Python v2.6.6 >>>

Using value wrapper and operator() overloading to simplify getter/setter design : a dangerous practice?

不羁岁月 提交于 2019-12-05 06:34:35
Consider the following class: class MyClass1 { public: double x() const {return _x;} // getter double y() const {return _y;} // getter double z() const {return _x*_y;} // getter void x(const double var) {_x = var;} // setter void y(const double var) {_y = var;} // setter void z(const double var) {_x = var; _y = 1;} // setter protected: double _x; double _y; }; As the actual contents of MyClass1 is an implementation detail, the getters and setters provide a unified way to get and set the class contents even if they are interdependant (here _z does not exists internally but for the user, z is a