getter-setter

问题 I have an object that contains a getter. myObject { id: "MyId", get title () { return myRepository.title; } } myRepository.title = "MyTitle"; I want to obtain an object like: myResult = { id: "MyId", title: "MyTitle" } I don't want to copy the getter, so: myResult.title; // Returns "MyTitle" myRepository.title = "Another title"; myResult.title; // Should still return "MyTitle" I've try: $.extend(): But it doesn't iterate over getters. http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6145 Iterating properties as

问题 Closed . This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post. Closed 5 years ago . I am trying to write an abstract class. This class is going to be a Field. There will be different types of fields which will need to extend the field class and write its own setter class. For example....There will be a String Field and an Integer Field. String Field will need to extend the Field

问题 Closed . This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post. Closed 4 years ago . When writing an application(in java) that you intend to open source, is it generally a good idea to have a lot of getters & setters and make variables private? More specifically, if that were to be an android application , would the answer to the question above still hold?

问题 Is there a way to generate all getters and setters in an entire package in eclipse? Thanks. 回答1: Assuming you're using Java, you may want to take a look at Project Lombok. 回答2: Generating getters and setters on everything in an entire package seems like a very bad idea. Not everything should be accessible or modifiable. Good OO design includes knowing when to encapsulate by keeping some things private. That said, you might already know this. If you're looking to do this for some academic

问题 There is the way to exclude getter and setters from sonar report. Suppose I have 2 "getters": public int getId(){ return this.id; } public int getComplexId(){ int result = 0; // some complex calculation there return result; } It is possible to exclude getId() and include getComplexId() simultaneously? Can Sonar analyze simple return this.id from complex code? 回答1: You can use NOPMD comment to avoid Sonar analysis. public int getId(){ // NOPMD return this.id; } public int getComplexId(){ int

问题 I am attempting to write some code to create getters and setters for the ID number, first name, last name, midterm score, and final score of the following data, which is in a text file, in a class i'm writing... 10601 ANDRES HYUN 88 91 94 94 89 84 94 84 89 87 89 91 10611 THU ZECHER 83 79 89 87 88 88 86 81 84 80 89 81 10622 BEVERLEE WAMPOLE 95 92 91 96 99 97 99 89 94 96 90 97 10630 TRUMAN SOVIE 68 73 77 76 72 71 72 77 67 68 72 75 The ID is the first number, first and last name are self

问题 I'm using Enterprise Architect to make a UML class diagram and generate PHP5 code. How can I generate getter and setter methods for a certain class? 回答1: Add the <<Property>> Stereotype to the attribute you want to create Getters and Setters for. For further reference see http://www.sparxsystems.com/uml_tool_guide/modeling/attributes.htm and http://www.sparxsystems.com/uml_tool_guide/modeling/createprop.htm 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15447025/generate-getters-and-setters-for-php

问题 I am extending a very simple Java interface from an imported library. The interface is so simple that the only methods it declares are getters and setters for a list of properties. My application is written in Groovy, so I'd like to implement this Java interface with a Groovy class. I was under the impression that Groovy created getters and setters by default for any of its classes' properties - can I use these default getters and setters to satisfy the Java interface's requirements? Library

问题 Since the advent of AS3 I have been working like this: private var loggy:String; public function getLoggy ():String { return loggy; } public function setLoggy ( loggy:String ):void { // checking to make sure loggy's new value is kosher etc... this.loggy = loggy; } and have avoided working like this: private var _loggy:String; public function get loggy ():String { return _loggy; } public function set loggy ( loggy:String ):void { // checking to make sure loggy's new value is kosher etc...

问题 It is very unpredictable result of code for me. I did not expect this code to produce such a result. So, I read Jeffrey Richter's book (clr ia c#) and there is a example with this code. internal class ClassRoom { private List<String> _students = new List<string>(); public List<String> Students { get { return _students; } } } ClassRoom classRoom = new ClassRoom { Students = {"Mike", "Johny", "Vlad", "Stas"} }; foreach (var some in classRoom.Students) { Console.WriteLine(some); } And, as some