forward

1. kubectl get pods -n istio-system -w kubectl get service -n istio-system -w 2. 要把访问 Port 映射出去一次： kubectl port-forward --address 0.0.0.0 {pod-name} 20001 -n istio-system 把kiali 映射出去一次： kubectl port-forward --address 0.0.0.0 kiali-fb5f485fb-2jczp 20001 -n istio-system 把grafana 映射出去一次： kubectl port-forward --address 0.0.0.0 grafana-6c8f45499-9k6n6 3000 -n istio-system 来源： https://www.cnblogs.com/xiaoyongyang/p/11959715.html

神经网络的典型处理如下所示： 1. 定义可学习参数的网络结构（堆叠各层和层的设计）； 2. 数据集输入； 3. 对输入进行处理（由定义的网络层进行处理）,主要体现在网络的前向传播； 4. 计算loss ，由Loss层计算； 5. 反向传播求梯度； 6. 根据梯度改变参数值,最简单的实现方式（SGD）为: weight = weight - learning_rate * gradient 下面是利用PyTorch定义深度网络层（Op）示例： class FeatureL2Norm(torch.nn.Module): def __init__(self): super(FeatureL2Norm, self).__init__() def forward(self, feature): epsilon = 1e-6 # print(feature.size()) # print(torch.pow(torch.sum(torch.pow(feature,2),1)+epsilon,0.5).size()) norm = torch.pow(torch.sum(torch.pow(feature,2),1)+epsilon,0.5).unsqueeze(1).expand_as(feature) return torch.div(feature,norm) class

使用场景 在接口开发过程中，在Controller层实现供前端调用的接口开中时，有时一个功能已经在其他Controller中实现过，如在该Controller中重复实现一遍会造成代码冗余，不是推荐的方案？那怎么做到让前端开发人员看着比较方便一点儿，而后端又不会产生冗余呢？这里推荐在Controller中使用forward实现。 具体实现 这里举一个例子，比如MbrMemberCtroller中已经实现了对会员详情的获取，而此时需要开发一个订单的Controller，命名为OsmServiceOrderController，在这个Controller中需要获取供应方会员的详细信息（即 MbrMemberCtroller中已实现的会员详情），怎么实现呢？ 原始Controller实现 MbrMemberCtroller @ApiOperation(value = "获取会员详情", notes = "获取会员详情。", response = MbrMember.class, authorizations = {@Authorization(value="apikey")}) @ApiImplicitParams({ @ApiImplicitParam(name = "mbrMemberId", value = "会员编号", required = true, dataType =

使用场景 在接口开发过程中，在Controller层实现供前端调用的接口开中时，有时一个功能已经在其他Controller中实现过，如在该Controller中重复实现一遍会造成代码冗余，不是推荐的方案？那怎么做到让前端开发人员看着比较方便一点儿，而后端又不会产生冗余呢？这里推荐在Controller中使用forward实现。 具体实现 这里举一个例子，比如MbrMemberCtroller中已经实现了对会员详情的获取，而此时需要开发一个订单的Controller，命名为OsmServiceOrderController，在这个Controller中需要获取供应方会员的详细信息（即 MbrMemberCtroller中已实现的会员详情），怎么实现呢？ 原始Controller实现 MbrMemberCtroller @ApiOperation(value = "获取会员详情", notes = "获取会员详情。", response = MbrMember.class, authorizations = {@Authorization(value="apikey")}) @ApiImplicitParams({ @ApiImplicitParam(name = "mbrMemberId", value = "会员编号", required = true, dataType =

According to javadoc: in- request.getRequestDispatcher("/Test").forward(request,response); forward should be called before the response has been committed to the client (before response body output has been flushed).Uncommitted output in the response buffer is automatically cleared before the forward. I am getting confused when this response is committed or been flushed? is this writing in println of printwriter . Calling flush() on the PrintWriter commits the response. forward method allows one servlet to do preliminary processing of a request and another resource to generate the response.

Looking through some legacy code I have in front of me using struts one, I see: <global-forwards> ... <forward name="accessDenied" path="/www/jsp/AccessDeniedForm.do" redirect="true" /> </global-forwards> So it's just a global forward to send to a access denied page. I am curious about the decision to redirect as opposed to forward. What are the advantages and disadvantages of using it? What are the pro's and con's of using it? Before discussing pro's and con's of using that forward element with redirect set to true, let's understand what is actually going on with that configuration. When

How to do JSF internal page forward programatically in managed bean, on some condition (like whenever an exception occurs)? I do not want to change the URL while forwarding to other page. Right now I redirect to another page programmatically using this, but this changes the URL. FacesContext.getCurrentInstance().getExternalContext().redirect(); Try this: public void forward(){ String uri = "destination.xhtml"; FacesContext.getCurrentInstance().getExternalContext().dispatch(uri); } You can do using FacesContext.getCurrentInstance().getViewRoot().setViewId("your target view id"); FacesContext