findbugs

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance. I already have used the Google CodePro AnalytiX but I never used Findbugs. My first impression with Findbugs is that it is harder to configure. After that, I believe that both are similar. What's your opinion? Just one more question related: None of these

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: Has anyone managed to get findbugs 2.3.1, 2.3.2-SNAPSHOT or 2.4-SNAPSHOT to work with a Maven 3.x project? I always end up with: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.codehaus.mojo:findbugs-maven-plugin:2.4-SNAPSHOT:findbugs (default-cli) on project cular-db: An error has occurred in FindBugs Report report generation. Could not find matching constructor for: org.codehaus.mojo.findbugs.FindbugsReportGenerator(org.codehaus.doxia.module.xhtml.XhtmlSink, java.util.PropertyResourceBundle, java.io.File, org.apache.maven.doxia.tools.DefaultSiteTool) I

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I have a class RequestFilter and @Override methods doFilterInternal. And when i add Header for response, findbugs show error HTTP parameter directly written to HTTP header output. So how can i fix this problem? Thanks all. String rqHd = request.getHeader("Access-Control-Request-Headers"); response.addHeader("Access-Control-Allow-Headers", rqHd); // findbugs error here 回答1: I think this is HRS_REQUEST_PARAMETER_TO_HTTP_HEADER error, and you can fix it like that: String rqHd = request.getHeader("Access-Control-Request-Headers"); if(rqHd !=

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I created a new project in Android Studio 2.2 Preview 1 with Android App and Backend module with Google Messaging. This is the app file apply plugin: 'com.android.application' android { compileSdkVersion 23 buildToolsVersion "23.0.3" defaultConfig { applicationId "com.xxx.xxx" minSdkVersion 15 targetSdkVersion 23 versionCode 1 versionName "1.0" testInstrumentationRunner "android.support.test.runner.AndroidJUnitRunner" } buildTypes { release { minifyEnabled false proguardFiles getDefaultProguardFile('proguard-android.txt'), 'proguard-rules

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I am currently using the sonarqube server 5.6 with scanner 2.6.1 and I keep getting errors during analysis for a java project. It appears to complain about some java files not compiled in the binaries folder (there aren't any at all in the binaries folder). Once I add the -X parameter I get more exceptions (flagged as ignored), see below. any clues? sonar-project.properties followed by logs sonar.projectKey=myproj sonar.projectName=myproj sonar.projectVersion=1.1 sonar.branch=1.1 sonar.sources=./java sonar.binaries=./deploy sonar.log.level

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I've been experimenting with the jsr 305 annotations for use with Findbugs, specifically the @CheckForNull annotation which would have avoided a bug I just found making it out to customers. I've added jsr305.jar and annotations.jar to my build path but the bugs aren't found by findbugs. I'm using Eclipse with the Eclipse Findbugs plugin. Below is some sample code which shows the same bug but doesn't when I run findbugs over it find the bug. I have tried this in Eclipse Galileo and Ganymede. public class FindBugsAnnotationsTest { ArrayList

FindBugs has found a potential bug in my code. But it is not a bug. Is it possible to mark this occurrence as 'not a bug' AND have it removed from the bug list? I have documented quite clearly why for each case it is not a bug. For example. A class implements the comparable interface. it has the compareTo method. I have however not overridden the equals method. FindBugs does not like this as the JavaDocs state that it is recommended that (x.compareTo(y)==0) == (x.equals(y)) Although in my case the above condition is and always will be true. Instead of using filters, you can also use the

I was recently asked about alternatives to Coverity Prevent for a code base that includes both C/C++ and Java. Obviously, on the Java side, the free tools available include Findbugs (compiled code analysis) and PMD (static code analysis). They are very powerful, especially when you start investigating integration with IDEs (which, again, are free). However, things are dicey when you start moving into the C/C++ realm with the various compilers, architectures, etc. I have proposed a variety of tools for the Java side, including both Findbugs and PMD. What I am looking for is the best option for

What is the difference between the two? Both seem to mean that the value may be null and should be dealt with accordingly i.e. checked for null. Update: The two annotations above are part of JSR-305/FindBugs: http://findbugs.sourceforge.net/manual/annotations.html lbalazscs I think it is pretty clear from the link you added: if you use @CheckForNull and the code that uses the value does not check for null , FindBugs will show it as an error. FindBugs will ignore @Nullable . In practice this annotation is useful only for overriding an overarching NonNull annotation. Use @CheckForNull in the

1、是个啥？ 　　Findbugs，它是一个静态分析工具，用来查找Java代码中的程序错误。它使用静态分析来识别Java程序中上百种不同类型的潜在错误。 2、安装 　　File -> Settings -> Plugins -> Marketplace 搜索“Findbugs” 安装完重启IDEA 3、使用 　　（1）在代码编辑框右键，选择”FindBugs”菜单，选择需要分析的文件 　　（2）分析完成后，底栏会有窗口，显示结果： 　　（3）如果有bug的话，会显示错误图标和提示（图来自网络）： 来源： https://www.cnblogs.com/GuixinChan/p/11753745.html