extend

Extending class at runtime

旧时模样 提交于 2019-12-01 05:35:32
So for this project I am trying to extend a class at runtime. What I would like to know, is this even possible? If so, how would I do it? Are there libraries out there for these things? CGLib is a library you're looking for. It's quite powerfull in extending classes or implementing interfaces in runtime, so many popular frameworks, like Spring or Hibernate use it. You can create class extension with code like public Object createProxy(Class targetClass) { Enhancer enhancer = new Enhancer(); enhancer.setSuperclass(targetClass); enhancer.setCallback(NoOp.INSTANCE); return enhancer.create(); }

Is it possible to extend Eclipse Search Menu

馋奶兔 提交于 2019-12-01 05:18:28
问题 right now in eclipse it is not possible to extend Menu defined by Other plugins by using eclipse extension: org.eclipse.ui.menus. I want to add one menu item in Search but not a search page. since the Menu Search is defined by org.eclipse.search, I cannot add it. but I see JDT and CDT do add some menu item under search. does any body know how they make it work? any hint is appreciated. 回答1: You can extend menus from other plugins using org.eclipse.ui.actionSets extension point This is how the

How to Inherit or Extend typeDefs in GraphQL

风格不统一 提交于 2019-12-01 04:23:33
I have a type User . Users can also be a type TeamMember . The only difference between a User and TeamMember is an added field teamRole: String . So, I’d love to do something like the following to avoid having to redundantly define all the user's fields… type User { id: ID!, name: String, (many other field defs) } type TeamMember extends User { teamRole: String, } Anyone aware of a syntax for this? I thought extend would be the answer, but it seems more like javascript’s prototype extend is great if you have a base schema and want to build two or more usable schemas based on it. You can, for

Modifying jQuery extend to push array items within objects but extend other objects

会有一股神秘感。 提交于 2019-12-01 04:05:13
I'm thinking this must be a common problem but can't seem to find the solution. Using JSON config files to extend a jQuery object that contains objects and arrays. For the objects and simple properties, I want to overwrite (as extend does nicely). For the arrays there may or may not be existing items. Currently an array just overwrites the first elements var sourceObj = {propterty:"change Me",anArray:[{name:"first"},{name:"second"}]}, configJSON = '{"propterty":"New Val","anArray":[{"name":"third"}]}', configObj = JSON.parse(configJSON); $.extend(true,sourceObj,configObj); http://jsfiddle.net

Extending a Scala collection

对着背影说爱祢 提交于 2019-12-01 03:54:02
问题 I want a Map that throws on attempt to overwrite a value for existing key. I tried: trait Unoverwriteable[A, B] extends scala.collection.Map[A, B] { case class KeyAlreadyExistsException(e: String) extends Exception(e) abstract override def + [B1 >: B] (kv: (A, B1)): Unoverwriteable[A, B1] = { if (this contains(kv _1)) throw new KeyAlreadyExistsException( "key already exists in WritableOnce map: %s".format((kv _1) toString) ) super.+(kv) } abstract override def get(key: A): Option[B] = super

Cucumber class extending step definitions and hooks

天大地大妈咪最大 提交于 2019-12-01 03:53:30
I want to extend from a "AbstractBase_step" class in java. So I want to have a hook like: public abstract class AbstractBase_Steps { protected Scenario scenario; @Before public void background(Scenario scenario) { this.scenario = scenario; } } which is called for every step file: public abstract class Hello_Steps extends AbstractBase_Steps { } When I do this I get cucumber.runtime.CucumberException: You're not allowed to extend classes that define Step Definitions or hooks. class Hello_Steps extends class AbstractBase_Steps Does somebody has a trick for that? EDIT: For reusing same step

Extending class at runtime

佐手、 提交于 2019-12-01 03:45:23
问题 So for this project I am trying to extend a class at runtime. What I would like to know, is this even possible? If so, how would I do it? Are there libraries out there for these things? 回答1: CGLib is a library you're looking for. It's quite powerfull in extending classes or implementing interfaces in runtime, so many popular frameworks, like Spring or Hibernate use it. You can create class extension with code like public Object createProxy(Class targetClass) { Enhancer enhancer = new Enhancer

How to Inherit or Extend typeDefs in GraphQL

你。 提交于 2019-12-01 02:00:28
问题 I have a type User . Users can also be a type TeamMember . The only difference between a User and TeamMember is an added field teamRole: String . So, I’d love to do something like the following to avoid having to redundantly define all the user's fields… type User { id: ID!, name: String, (many other field defs) } type TeamMember extends User { teamRole: String, } Anyone aware of a syntax for this? I thought extend would be the answer, but it seems more like javascript’s prototype 回答1: extend

UML, include, extend relationship

怎甘沉沦 提交于 2019-12-01 01:51:37
I have trouble understanding how the include and the extend relationships work. Let's say i have an online application for shopping. The application allows you to add/retrieve items from your cart without being authenticated. Here is the "order" scenario: The client clicks on the order button. The system checks if the user is authenticated. If the user is authenticated the system displays the purchase page otherwise the user is redirected to the authentication page. I would like to know if i the "authentication" use case is included in the "order" use case and if so why ? (I'm asking this

In Swift, how to extend a typealias?

て烟熏妆下的殇ゞ 提交于 2019-11-30 23:46:37
问题 I have a typealias: typealias BeaconId = [String: NSObject] I'd like to extend it by doing something like: extension BeaconId {} But this throws a compile error: Constrained extension must be declared on the unspecialized generic type 'Dictionary' with constraints specified by a 'where' clause So I end up doing: extension Dictionary where Key: StringLiteralConvertible, Value: NSObject {} Is there a cleaner way to do this? 回答1: AFAIK, no. Consider the following example: typealias Height: Float