exe

I just learned ImageBase is specified in PE format,and OS will load it to the exact position for .EXE , then comes the question: what if two .EXE is requiring the same ImageBase location? st0le Incase of 2 EXE's, they have Completely Different Address Spaces...Every Executable has its own space. This means, every time you execute an EXE, it is assigned its own independent 4GB (on 32bit systems, although the process can use just part of it, the rest goes the kernel.) worth address space. It's Virtual Address Space . It's different from your Physical Memory. So there's no conflict. Technically,

I have Visual Studio 2015 solution ready for delivery. I have a requirement that the .exe should run out of the box. However, I am getting "missing dll..." errors. Is there any way I could make it possible for someone to run the exe without him needing to download bunch of ddls? Can I build the .exe to be executable as stand-alone somehow? Mahesh Yes, you have to statically link the binary. In the project settings (Configuration Properties -> C/C++ -> Code Generation), use /MT, /MTd for the Release, Debug configurations respectively. However, this bloats the size of the executable. MSDN

在python中比较常用的python转exe方法有三种，分别是cx_freeze,py2exe，PyInstaller。 py2exe是这三者里面知名度最高的，但稍微复杂一点的结构就无法完美的解决更不用提py3了 cx_freeze,本次所用的是4.3.2 64bit。 cx_freeze下载地址：http://sourceforge.net/projects/cx-freeze/files/ 第一步：检查cx_freeze是否安装正确(运行cmd，切换到cxfreeze.bat所在目录，然后执行 "cxfreeze -h" 看看能否出来 cx_freeze的帮助信息，如图一 ) 图一 如果提示系统找不到指定路径（如图二） 将cxfreeze.bat文件进行编辑 打开你的python安装文件夹，例如C:\Python33\Scripts 点击c xfreeze.bat文件右键点编辑,将里面的路径修改为自己的安装路径 如：C:\Python33\python.exe C:\Python33\Scripts\cxfreeze %* 然后保存，关闭记事本，重新执行第一步，看看是否正确。 二、如果安装正确，就可以使用啦 正式开始打包，命令为：cxfreeze hello.py --target-dir dist 命令解释：hello.py 是你要打包的主文件、启动文件

I have a program I want to be able to be installed easily by any user, and I thought creating a native installer was the way to go. I used Netbeans 8.0's functionalities (Project properties > Enable native packaging, and Package as). I was able to create a working native installer. After installation, I have the following file tree: +-- Project \+-- app \+--lib (containing all the jars used by the project) \---Project.jar \---package.cfg \+--runtime \+--jre (contains the current jre) \---Project.exe Executing the program from Project.jar works. However, when I try to launch Project.exe, I get

It's always seemed strange to me that downloadable applications would offer multiple types of installers. For example, sometimes you can choose either a .exe or a .msi Do certain types of installers have advantages over others? Does it matter which one you choose? As a developer, why would I want to offer different installers to my users? One big difference between the exe and msi: You can EDIT an MSI file. You can access the MSI Database directly using Orca -or- code it up through the WindowsInstaller APIs, using your favorite Windows hacking methods. Ex. I wrote a python based builder which,

I'm a student and at the moment i'm doing an internship at a company. This internship is about analysing a project. For this project I have made a demo to show to the Marketing director. The demo I have made is a simple project created in Visual Studio 2010 in c# with Windows Forms and a connection to an Access database. So now i have to show this demo to this director in a presentation but after this presentation the director wants the project on his computer so he can try and use it. The problem is now that the computers here in this company don't have .NET framework 4.0 and the computers