dto

I've seen a lot of questions related to mapping DTOs to Domain Objects, but I didn't feel they answered my question. I've used many methods before and have my own opinions but I'm looking for something a little more concrete. The Situation: We have many domain objects. We are using a CSLA model so our domain objects can be pretty complex and they contain their own data access. You do not want to pass these around on the wire. We are going to be writing some new services that will return data in a number of formats (.Net, JSON, etc.). For this (and other reasons) we are also creating a lean,

1、领域模型变更，不影响UI。 2、没有业务逻辑，更加安全。 3、粗粒度设计，减少调用次数(网络往返)。 4、DTO参数方便扩展，不影响方法签名。 5、客户端使用简单明了、服务端设计明显清晰。 6、DataAnnotation可植入DTO，以简单验证。 7..... 转载于:https://www.cnblogs.com/ToughGuy/p/4555399.html 来源： https://blog.csdn.net/weixin_30855761/article/details/99121335

abp(net core)+easyui+efcore实现仓储管理系统目录 abp(net core)+easyui+efcore实现仓储管理系统——ABP总体介绍(一） abp(net core)+easyui+efcore实现仓储管理系统——解决方案介绍(二) abp(net core)+easyui+efcore实现仓储管理系统——领域层创建实体(三) abp(net core)+easyui+efcore实现仓储管理系统——定义仓储并实现 (四) abp(net core)+easyui+efcore实现仓储管理系统——创建应用服务（五） abp(net core)+easyui+efcore实现仓储管理系统——展现层实现增删改查之控制器（六） abp(net core)+easyui+efcore实现仓储管理系统——展现层实现增删改查之列表视图（七） abp(net core)+easyui+efcore实现仓储管理系统——展现层实现增删改查之增删改视图（八） abp(net core)+easyui+efcore实现仓储管理系统——展现层实现增删改查之菜单与测试（九） abp(net core)+easyui+efcore实现仓储管理系统——多语言（十） abp(net core)+easyui+efcore实现仓储管理系统——使用 WEBAPI实现CURD (十一)

I have these data transfer objects: public class Report { public int Id { get; set; } public int ProjectId { get; set; } //and so on for many, many properties. } I don't want to write public bool areEqual(Report a, Report b) { if (a.Id != b.Id) return false; if (a.ProjectId != b.ProjectId) return false; //Repeat ad nauseum return true; } Is there a faster way to test if two object with only properties have the same values (something that doesn't require one line of code or one logical expression per property?) Switching to structs is not an option. How about some reflection, perhaps using

I've recently overheard people saying that data transfer objects (DTOs) are an anti-pattern . Why? What are the alternatives? KLE Some projects have all data twice . Once as domain objects, and once as data transfer objects. This duplication has a huge cost , so the architecture needs to get a huge benefit from this separation to be worth it. Gabe Moothart DTOs are not an anti-pattern. When you're sending some data across the wire (say, to an web page in an Ajax call), you want to be sure that you conserve bandwidth by only sending data that the destination will use. Also, often it is