dsl

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63936967/how-to-add-weightage-in-dsl-query-with-hierarchy-of-attributes

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63936967/how-to-add-weightage-in-dsl-query-with-hierarchy-of-attributes

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63936967/how-to-add-weightage-in-dsl-query-with-hierarchy-of-attributes

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62988302/how-to-match-elastic-search-query-partial-match-multiple-query

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62850169/what-can-i-do-with-dsl-languages-generated-inside-jetbrains-mps

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62850169/what-can-i-do-with-dsl-languages-generated-inside-jetbrains-mps

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62850169/what-can-i-do-with-dsl-languages-generated-inside-jetbrains-mps

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62850169/what-can-i-do-with-dsl-languages-generated-inside-jetbrains-mps

问题 I've read comments stating that Scala's flexibility makes it easy for developers to write DSLs that are difficult to understand and reason about. DSLs are possible because we can sometimes omit . and parentheses (e.g. List(1) map println ) we can sometimes interchange () and {} we have implicit values, parameters, and classes (also conversions, which are now discouraged) there is a relatively small number of reserved symbols in the language (e.g. I can define + for my class) and possibly

问题 I've read comments stating that Scala's flexibility makes it easy for developers to write DSLs that are difficult to understand and reason about. DSLs are possible because we can sometimes omit . and parentheses (e.g. List(1) map println ) we can sometimes interchange () and {} we have implicit values, parameters, and classes (also conversions, which are now discouraged) there is a relatively small number of reserved symbols in the language (e.g. I can define + for my class) and possibly