documentation

The parameters of a block in Swift shows up with a table for parameters of the block if you add markup for documentation but I can not figure out how to fill out this table. I have searched for it in the Xcode markup reference formatting but I couldn't find anything on it. Example: /** Foo - parameter completion: A block to execute */ func foo(completion: (Bool) -> Void) { // do something } This is what shows up if I option + click in Xcode on the function above to view documentation: Apple's APIs show the completion block parameter table filled out. This is an example of a CloudKit API

I have written a epytext to reST markup converter, and now I want to convert all the docstrings in my entire library from epytext to reST format. Is there a smart way to read the all the docstrings in a module and write back the replacements? ps: ast module perhaps? Pyment is a tool that can convert Python docstrings and create missing ones skeletons. It can manage Google , Epydoc (javadoc style), Numpydoc , reStructuredText (reST, Sphinx default) docstring formats. It accepts a single file or a folder (exploring also sub-folders). For each file, it will recognize each docstring format and

I am a newbie for emacs and common lisp. I am now using emacs and slime to learn P.Graham “ANSI Common LISP”. However, when I meet something that I don't konw, I can not easily get some useful info like linux man. Is there any common lisp docs like linux man? Common Lisp HyperSpec describes the ANSI Common Lisp standard, and, as such, is more similar to the POSIX Standard than to Linux man pages . Since you use Emacs, you can use clhs.el to lookup specific symbols there: (autoload 'common-lisp-hyperspec "clhs" "Get doc on ANSI CL" t) (define-key help-map "\C-s" 'common-lisp-hyperspec) Note: I

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Learn more . Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Does anyone know if there is an XSD file somewhere that can be used to validate the XML documentation that gets generated when you compile a C# project with the /doc option? I want to modify that file manually after it's been generated and I'm looking for an easy way to confirm that I haven't damaged the structure of the file. Thanks. I finally broke down and wrote one: XSD for Xml Comments for .NET Documentation

I'm documenting a c++ project for college with Doxygen, and everything is correct, but the dependency graph shows like this: I would like that the graph doesn't show inclusions such as list, map or string, and only includes custom Classes i created for the project, but i can't find anything online or on the docs. Does anyone know how to do this? Since you want to exclude the stdlib container classes, you should probably add the std:: namespace to your doxyfile: EXCLUDE_SYMBOLS = std::* This will ignore all classes located in that namespace, and thus skip them in the generated diagram. You may

Closed . This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers. Learn more . Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post . I would like to know from those who document unit tests how they are documenting it. I understand that most TDD followers claim "the code speaks" and thus test documentation is not very important because code should be self-descriptive. Fair enough, but I would like to know how to document unit tests, not whether to document them at all. My experience as a developer tells me that