documentation

I used doxygen to create HTML files, now I want to convert that documentation into .chm format. How can I do this? NDoc is a dead project, it's successor is Sandcastle & Sandcastle Helpfile Builder . I've used both of the Sandcastle items. They're easy to setup, have decent documentation and chm file generation is native to the application. If you can switch, it would be a much better choice than doxygen. Otherwise check out this link for HTML to chm info: http://younsi.blogspot.com/2007/04/doxygen-to-html-to-chm.html The original NDoc project is dead, but there is a new project called NDoc3 .

I'm working on a project that requires Numpy documentation. In my Java days, I remember having linters that checked for Javadoc adherence in Eclipse/IDEA; is there an equivalent that checks for Numpy documentation style adherence? I know about PEP257, but it doesn't seem to have any specific checks for Numpy documentation. Pylint seems to support that. Take a look at pylint.extensions.docparams . To sum it up. You activate this checker of pylint by adding load-plugins=pylint.extensions.docparams in the Master section of your .pylintrc . This checker verifies that all function, method, and

i have the habbit to comment properties and classes with the standard XML documentation, what it means / what they do. But in EF generated classes off course, these are all gone when i regenerate the model. Is there another way to do this? As Ladislav stated in his answer, you need to modify the T4 template so the comments will be included in the generated code. This answer was taken from this article : First of all you need to specify your comments in the properties boxes of the model designer. Under Documentation -> Long Description, and Summary. Then in the template, you can for example add

Given an angular app with a factory that returns a class, as such: angular.module('fooApp').factory('User', function(){ function User(name){ this.name = name; } User.prototype.greet = function(){ return "Howdy, " + this.name; } return User; }); Using ngdoc (the special flavor of jsdoc angular uses), how do I document the initializer without defining it as a method? Right now, this is what I've tried: /** * @ngdoc service * @name fooApp.User * @description User factory. */ angular.module('fooApp').factory('User', function(){ /** * @ngdoc method * @methodOf fooApp.User * @name Initializer *

I am using D2007 and am trying to document my source code, using the HelpInsight feature (provided since D2005). I am mainly interested in getting the HelpInsight tool-tips working. From various Web-surfing and experimentation I have found the following: Using the triple slash (///) comment style works more often than the other documented comment styles. i.e.: {*! comment *} and {! comment } The comments must precede the declaration that they are for. For most cases this will mean placing them in the interface section of the code. (The obvious exception is for types and functions that are not

This is a similar to question 30360391 . I want to express that the parameter of a function is a plain JS object that can have arbitrary properties (with unknown) names but all properties are objects themselves with fixed properties. An example: The function is just like this /** * @param {Descriptor} desc */ function foo( desc ) { // ... } and a typical desc looks like desc = { unknownEntity1: { priority: 5; writable: false; }, unknownEntity2: { priority: 42; writable: true; }, unknownEntity3: { priority: 9; writable: false; } } I already have /** * @typedef {Object} DescriptorEntry *

I'm using roxygen2 as a tool for documenting my R package, and I found that there is a @references tag in roxygen2, but that seems to only accept free form text. I found some presentation about roxygen which has tags @bibliograph and @cite, but am I correct that there is no such thing in roxygen2? Should I then somehow take the references out of the bibtex-file and write them manually with appropriate formatting directly after the @references tag or is there some more clever way of doing this? I have about seven different articles I need to cite, over multiple functions/rd-files. Seems that

A new problem just popped up yesterday. When I hover over a method or press Ctrl-Q, I used to get documentation info for that particular method. But now I just get (pressing Ctrl-Q on SharedPreferences.getLong() ): Following external urls were checked: http://developer.android.com/reference/android/content/SharedPreferences.html#getLong-java.lang.String-long- http://developer.android.com/reference/android/content/SharedPreferences.html#getLong(java.lang.String, long) The documentation for this element is not found. Please add all the needed paths to API docs in Project Settings. android

I want to document the default value of an enum typed field: /// <summary> /// The default value is <see cref="Orientation.Horizontal" />. /// </summary> public Orientation BoxOrientation; The compiler warns that it couldn't resolve the reference. Prefixing F: or M: silences the compiler, but E: also does, so I'm unsure what prefix is correct. The prefixes F , M and E are all valid and probably the reason that the compiler warning disappears. You should however use the F that refers to fields. For more information on how Visual Studio generates documentation identifiers see: Processing the XML