deprecated

Drive.DriveApi.getAppFolder(mGoogleApiClient) deprecated

邮差的信 提交于 2019-12-20 06:15:38
问题 While trying to set up the Google Drive API for Android, In this line Drive.DriveApi.getAppFolder(mGoogleApiClient) I'm getting that both, DriveApi and getAppFolder are deprecated. What should I replace it with? 回答1: The deprecation was officially announced in this reference page: This interface was deprecated. Gain access to the Drive API with one of the Drive#get*Client() methods instead. This was replaced with methods like getDriveClient and you can see sample code demos in googledrive

What is the preferred way to count number of ocurrances of certain character in string (Python)?

拥有回忆 提交于 2019-12-20 03:46:10
问题 How do I do this without str.count() , because it is listed as deprecated in Python v2.7.3 documentation? I am unable to find what I should use instead. 回答1: Use str.count() - it's not listed as deprecated. (Python 2.7.3, Python 3.2.3 - both have no notes about being deprecated). >>> "test".count("t") 2 I'll presume you meant string.count() - which is depreciated in favour of the method on string objects. The difference is that str.count() is a method on string objects, while string.count()

Alternative to .selector property now that it is removed in jQuery 1.9

北慕城南 提交于 2019-12-19 20:36:52
问题 As of jQuery 1.9 the .selector property of jQuery objects has been removed. (I'm a little confused as to why, exactly). I actually use it in a few unique scenarios, and I know that I could do other things to prevent this. Just wondering if anyone knows another way of grabbing the selector as of 1.9? $('#whatever').selector // (would of returned '#whatever') One example of where I need .selector is when I already have a group of checkboxes by name , and I want to see, within that group, which

What should we use for ClientResponse and GenericType in latest version (3.0.x) Resteasy?

孤者浪人 提交于 2019-12-19 10:14:07
问题 I am developing Resteasy . I migrated my application's maven dependencies from 2.2.x to 3.0.x and suddenly I saw most of the API's are deprecated. So this migration has affect to my code and test cases as its simply saying deprecated in my whole code. I am taking example of my test cases: Test case with earlier version(in latest version it deprectaed as mentioned in link: ClientRequestFactory RestEasy Deprecated... Any other RestEasy alternative ? ): import org.jboss.resteasy.util.GenericType

'java.lang.String' is deprecated in Android

霸气de小男生 提交于 2019-12-19 05:56:22
问题 I have write simple TAG like this: private static final String TAG = "MainActivity"; String is deprecated Is there any alternative way available to use String ? 回答1: As per comment in this java-lang-string-is-deprecated-in-android-studio question, Remove folder .AndroidStudioX.X in your User folder and Restart IDE. NOTE: AndroidStudioX.X means if you are using Android Studio version 3.4 then .AndroidStudio3.4 will be there. Path will be like Windows : C:\Users\<PCNAME>\.AndroidStudio3.4 Linux

What is this I hear about the table tag being deprecated?

喜你入骨 提交于 2019-12-19 05:28:20
问题 Because that might mess me up, somewhat. I'm not entirely clear on what I'm supposed to use to replicate some of its functionality effectively, should I adopt a newer standard down the road. I can't seem to find good information sources to verify this, though. Would there be a good reason for this? 回答1: table tag isn't deprecated (you can look at the html spec). What you've heard of is probably tableless layouts, because tables should not be used for positioning elements on the page. 回答2: The

Why will std::rel_ops::operators be deprecated in C++20?

生来就可爱ヽ(ⅴ<●) 提交于 2019-12-19 05:06:38
问题 According to cppreference.com, std::rel_ops::operator!=,>,<=,>= will be deprecated in C++20. What's the rationale behind? 回答1: In C++20, you get three-way comparison (operator <=> ), which automatically "generates" default comparisons if provided: struct A { // You only need to implement a single operator. std::strong_ordering operator<=>(const A&) const; }; // Compiler generates all 6 relational operators A to1, to2; if (to1 == to2) { /* ... */ } // ok if (to1 <= to2) { /* ... */ } // ok,

Deprecating FBML

久未见 提交于 2019-12-19 04:44:11
问题 As you probably already know (or read quote at the end of this post), Facebook is deprecating FBML in favor of iframes for developping applications. I am currently launching a new browser plug in and need a landing tab on my facebook page with personalized install buttons and all the useful features one can wish to have on a fan page. However, I cannot use an iframe in my page because Facebook forbids it (see SO related question here) and I am told not to use FBML because it is being

Is using $GLOBALS['HTTP_GET_VARS'] deprecated?

﹥>﹥吖頭↗ 提交于 2019-12-19 03:59:08
问题 I know that the use of $HTTP_GET_VARS is deprecated but what about using $GLOBALS['HTTP_GET_VARS']? Is that array key likely to disappear in the future? I basically have the following all over a legacy project that I need to integrate with a CMS and I don't really want to have to update it unless strictly necessary. function table_manager_import_vars($var) { $vars = explode(",", $var); foreach($vars AS $var) { switch ($var) { case "G": $var = "HTTP_GET_VARS"; break; case "P": $var = "HTTP

How to deprecate a macro in GCC?

99封情书 提交于 2019-12-18 19:18:00
问题 i Know how to use attribute deprecated to deprecate a function like this: int old_fn () __attribute__ ((deprecated)); But how to deprecate a Macro like this: #define OLD_MACRO 1 Thank you in advance. Eric 回答1: Nice, elegant solution, however depending on C99 being enabled (works with gcc 4.8.2 or later, not tested on earlier versions): #define DEPRECATED_MACRO1 _Pragma ("GCC warning \"'DEPRECATED_MACRO1' macro is deprecated\"") 7 #define DEPRECATED_MACRO2(...) _Pragma ("GCC warning \"