definition

What's the definition of a Shim? From Wikipedia: In computer programming, a shim is a small library that transparently intercepts an API, changing the parameters passed, handling the operation itself, or redirecting the operation elsewhere. Shims typically come about when the behaviour of an API changes, thereby causing compatibility issues for older applications that still rely on the older functionality. In these cases, the older API can still be supported by a thin compatibility layer on top of the newer code. Shims can also be used to run programs on different software platforms than they

I write code below: let array1: [Int] = [0,1] let array2 = array1 + [2] It just works.I want to find where + operator define. I search ArrayExtension in my workspace without result.I search Apple doc Collection Sequence Array , there is no result. Is there a way to navigate to operator definition ,like CMD + CTRL + J for func You can select the operator in the Xcode source editor, and choose "Navigate -> Jump to definition" from the menu, or press CMD+CTRL+J. (This was broken in Xcode 10, but works again in Xcode 11, which is currently in beta.) 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53651936

The BASE acronym is used to describe the properties of certain databases, usually NoSQL databases. It's often referred to as the opposite of ACID . There are only few articles that touch upon the details of BASE, whereas ACID has plenty of articles that elaborate on each of the atomicity, consistency, isolation and durability properties. Wikipedia only devotes a few lines to the term. This leaves me with some questions about the definition : B asically A vailable, S oft state, E ventual consistency I have interpreted these properties as follows, using this article and my imagination: Basically

Basically what I am trying to do is change the definition of complex numbers so I can represent vectors in Scheme. I want to be able to write something like "i+j+k" without the quotes and not have the program go entirely crazy. I know complex numbers can be represented by something like "1+2i" so I was hoping a simple overwrite could accomplish this. I thought overwriting the complex? definition might work, but it seems to have no effect. I am unsure of where the code I need to affect even is. Any help would be amazing. Thanks. Are you aware that the Racket reader already supports complex

Well, I've this problem now. I've a (huge) set of parameters I'd like to organize in a vector. Of course, I can do something like: real, dimension(64) :: CONST CONST(1) = 2.4 CONST(2) = 1.4 ... CONST(n) = CONST(1)*CONST(14)**CONST(7) ... CONST(64) = ABS(CONST(18)) (Note that some of the constants are related to other constants). But in that case, I wouldn't have the parameter attribute in the variable, wich I'd like to have. The other option I can think about is using the attribute parameter , in which case I've to assign the value to the vector during the definition of the variable. Something

I hope you can help. I am looking for a way to write a function that inserts one item later. Let me show you an example: def general_poly(L): """ L, a list of numbers (n0, n1, n2, ... nk) Returns a function, which when applied to a value x, returns the value n0 * x^k + n1 * x^(k-1) + ... nk * x^0 """ x = 1 res = 0 n = len(L)-1 for e in range(len(L)): res += L[e]*x**n n -= 1 return res I thought I could just give x a value here and once I do general_poly(L)(10) it will be replaced so that x = 10 but apparently it is not that easy. What do I have to change / add so that my function works? How

In C++, declaration and definition of functions, variables and constants can be separated like so: function someFunc(); function someFunc() { //Implementation. } In fact, in the definition of classes, this is often the case. A class is usually declared with it's members in a .h file, and these are then defined in a corresponding .C file. What are the advantages & disadvantages of this approach? Historically this was to help the compiler. You had to give it the list of names before it used them - whether this was the actual usage, or a forward declaration (C's default funcion prototype aside).