declaration

I came across the data type int32_t in a C program recently. I know that it stores 32 bits, but don't int and int32 do the same? Also, I want to use char in a program. Can I use int8_t instead? What is the difference? To summarize: what is the difference between int32, int, int32_t, int8 and int8_t in C? Jerry Coffin Between int32 and int32_t , (and likewise between int8 and int8_t ) the difference is pretty simple: the C standard defines int8_t and int32_t , but does not define anything named int8 or int32 -- the latter (if they exist at all) is probably from some other header or library

I try to build an ionic 2 app. When I try the app in the browser with ionic serve or launch it on an emulator everything works fine. But when I try to build it every time the error ionic-app-script tast: "build" Error Type AddEvent in "PATH"/add.event.ts is part of the declarations of 2 modules: AppModule in "PATH"/app.modules.ts and AddEvent in "PATH"/add-event.module.ts. Please consider moving AddEvent in "PATH"/add-event.ts to a higher module that imports AppModule in "PATH"/app.module.ts and AddEventModule. You can also creat a new NgModule that exports and includes AddEvent then import

Why is the declaration of the variable 'a' not used in the output of the console log of the below code? Doesn't that go against the scope chain? The variable 'a' with the undefined value on line 4 surely should be used on the console output on line 5? var a = 15; function checkScope(a) { var a; console.log(a); // log outputs 15 and not undefined } checkScope(a); I want to understand this behaviour. To confirm, this behaviour has nothing to do with hoisting or even scope (i.e. scope chain)? I don't believe scope is relevant to explain this behaviour because 'a' exists locally (its value is '

I get the following error message (someone feel free to edit the unnecessary bits): 1>FIXDecoder.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol "private: static class std::unordered_map,class std::allocator >,class std::basic_string,class std::allocator >,struct std::hash,class std::allocator > >,struct std::equal_to,class std::allocator > >,class std::allocator,class std::allocator > const ,class std::basic_string,class std::allocator > > > > FD::FixValueMappingsDict" (?FixValueMappingsDict@FD@@0V?$unordered_map@V?$basic_string@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@V12@U?$hash@V?

// K&R syntax int foo(a, p) int a; char *p; { return 0; } // ANSI syntax int foo(int a, char *p) { return 0; } As you see, in K&R style, the types of variables are declared in new lines instead of in the braces. How to convert a K&R function declaration to an ANSI function declaration automatically? Does anybody know such an easy-to-use tool in Linux? You can use cproto or protoize (part of GCC) to generate function prototypes or convert old style (K&R) functions to ANSI format. Since You wanna convert a multiline string, you chould consider perl you have void old_style( c , a ) char c; int a;

Can I assign each value in an array to separate variables in one line in C#? Here's an example in Ruby code of what I want: irb(main):001:0> str1, str2 = ["hey", "now"] => ["hey", "now"] irb(main):002:0> str1 => "hey" irb(main):003:0> str2 => "now" I'm not sure if what I'm wanting is possible in C#. Edit: for those suggesting I just assign the strings "hey" and "now" to variables, that's not what I want. Imagine the following: irb(main):004:0> val1, val2 = get_two_values() => ["hey", "now"] irb(main):005:0> val1 => "hey" irb(main):006:0> val2 => "now" Now the fact that the method get_two

The compiler says it can't find the reference for the function when I do this: // link.h template <class T> T *Link(T *&, T *(*)()) // link.cpp template <class T> T c:Link(T *&ChildNodeReference, T *(*ObjectCreator)()){ } If I implement inside the class on the header it goes smoothly. Please, I will work on the header until someone enlightens me about this. There are somethings in C++ that are weirdly annoying. I know, there is a reason for this and etc. Even so, can't the compilers help you out about it -_-" Programming non-template code or non-inlined functions in headers is a Bad Thing™.

Every time I read about the "inline" declaration in C it is mentioned that it is only a hint to the compiler (i.e. it does not have to obey it). Is there any benefit to adding it then, or should I just rely on the compiler knowing better than me? There are two reasons to use the inline keyword. One is an optimization hint, and you can safely ignore it; your compiler is like to ignore it too. The other reason is to allow a function to exist in multiple translation units, and that usage is strictly necessary. If you put a function into a .h header file for example, you'd better declare it inline