controllers

I am rewriting a large application from silver-light to angularjs, while doing it, I am realizing that each of my controller js file is spanning 2000-3000 lines of code . All of my code is heavily dependent on scope variables. Wondering if there is any opportunity to split single controller js file into multiple js files? Any pointer would be appreciated. Use multiple controller to handle the task in your page. If using a larg controller is unavoidable ,you can split the definition to multiple files by passing the scope to another method and then define the rest of methods there. In the first

Is it possible to get all controllers available to a ControllerFactory? What I want to do is get a list of all controller types in application, but in a consistent way. So that all controllers I get are the same ones default request resolution is using. (The actual task is to find all action methods that have a given attribute). You can use reflection to enumerate all classes in an assembly, and filter only classes inherit from Controller class. The best reference is asp.net mvc source code . Take a look of the implementations of ControllerTypeCache and ActionMethodSelector class.

Reading Guru-Gu's blog post about ASP.NET MVC3 hitting RC , he says:- Session-less Controller Support You can now indicate whether you want a Controller class to use session-state – and if so whether you want it to be read/write or readonly.read/write or readonly. Can someone explain what are some scenario's someone might want to have a session-less controller? or a read-only controller? I've always been creating a separate IIS website which I use to handle all static images/content and then have this same website have session state turned off ... so no cookies are sent over the wire. Is this

If I wanted to make a currentUser() function for some oauth stuff I am doing where I can use it in a view or in a controller (think rails, where you do helper_method: current_user in the application controller). Everything I read states to create a helpers folder and add the function there and then that way you can do Helpers::functionName Is this the right way to do this? Whats the "laravel way" of creating helper functions that can be used in blade templates and controllers? Create a new file in your app/Helpers directory name it AnythingHelper.php An example of my helper is : <?php function

I've been doing tutorials and trying to learn best practice when it comes to MVC development. The design I'm using below comes from Pro ASP.Net MVC5 by Apress/Adam Freeman. So far, everything is coming along good...but I still have not completely come to grip on working with Controllers. Yes, I understand the concept of Controllers, but still struggle when it comes to post and get methods. Here is the flow of my sample MVC application: My app.Domain project I have a user table in the database and reference it with Entities/Users.cs using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System

Is possible to connect two FXML (JavaFX) files to one controller? I can't do this with changing "fx:controller" in each FXML file... Any ideas? jewelsea Yes, you can do this. Although, it can be done, I do not recommend this approach . Don't place a fx:controller attribute in either FXML. Create a new controller and set the same controller into separate FXMLLoader instances. CustomerDialogController dialogController = new CustomerDialogController(param1, param2); FXMLLoader summaryloader = new FXMLLoader( getClass().getResource( "customerSummary.fxml" ) ); summaryLoader.setController

How come in sails you cannot access other controller methods from within another one? like this. module.exports = findStore: -> # do somthing index: -> @findStore(); # Error: undefined Compiled module.exports = { findStore: function() {}, index: function() { return this.findStore(); // Error: undefined } }; If you can't do this, then why not? how else should I be doing this... lloop Having the same problem for last few hours. I used the api/services folder. It may not be exactly what you need but it is an option. A good explanation is here. What services would one add to the api/services