compilation

I see a number of similar questions Netbeans 8.0 Unsupported major.minor version 52.0 error Unsupported major.minor version 52.0 Error (duplicate) Running a JAR I compiled: Unsupported major.minor version 52.0 Can't fix Unsupported major.minor version 52.0 even after fixing compatibility But none with the same circumstances as mine. I've tried their solutions anyway (when relevant) and they haven't helped. I had created a JavaFX FXML Application in NetBeans 8.0.2 and had to manually upgrade the JDK from 1.7 to 1.8 to get features I wanted. I believe I was using 1.8.0_52 for both the JRE and

I have two projects, one VB6 project which compiles to an EXE and one MSVC++2010 project which compiles to a DLL. The DLL needs to be in the same folder as the EXE file in order to work. Can I have Visual Studio 2010 automatically copy the compiled DLL to the VB6 project folder after a compilation? JaredPar The easiest way to set this up is to use a post build event. These run once a build is successfully completed and has a set of handy macros to make access to common outputs, like compiled files, very easy For example. Here are the steps to a compiled DLL / EXE into c:\temp Right Click on

I want to know what's the use of -mpreferred-stack-boundary option during compilation in GNU compiler. I've checked the documentation but the explanation is lost on me. Could someone please explain it. I want to know what's the use of -mpreferred-stack-boundary option during compilation in GNU debugger. The option has absolutely nothing to do with the debugger. It affects generated code in your binary. By default, GCC will arrange things so that every function, immediately upon entry, has its stack pointer aligned on 16-byte boundary (this may be important if you have local variables, and

I want to use Maven to execute a certain plug-in that only needs the source code but I do not want Maven to compile anything (mostly because the project just doesn't compile). How do I tell Maven to skip the compile step and just launch its plug-in and then package the generated resources together in a nice JAR? (The procedure of the last step is already known to me.) Additional Info: So we tried a lot of things right now, e.g.: <plugin> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId> <version>3.0</version> <configuration> <excludes> <exclude>**/*<

I'm very new to C++ world, so please, sorry me for such a dummy question. I google a little, but wasn't able to find proper answer. My question is fairly simple - how should I use lib's in C++ world. For example in Java - there is maven and gradle for this task. In Python - I use pip . In javascript npm and bower do all the stuff. In C# you use nuget or just adding DLL lib to your project. But looks like in C++ things isn't such easy. I found a tool, called conan but ammount of libs they have is pretty small and don't include any what i'm loking for. So, for example - I want to use nlp lib

I have noticed that the version 0.4.* of julia has a --compile option. Strangely, I cannot find any documentation about it. I was trying (in Ubuntu), to compile a julia script to an executable LLVM bytecode file. But until here, I failed: julia --compile=yes --output-bc test.bc test.jl Segmentation fault (core dumped) I also can get this error message: julia --compile=yes --output-bc test.bc test.jl ERROR: could not open file boot.jl This error does not appear anymore, if I put a boot.jl file in the same folder. How should I do to compile a julia script to an executable/obfuscated bytecode ?

I would like my C++/CLI headers to compile even when under another platform. Of course I am not expecting to compile them but just ignore them. Would this be appropriate ? (_MSC_VER) #ifdef _MSC_VER using namespace System; namespace ENMFP { public ref struct Data { }; } #endif Thanks ! You can use the __cplusplus_cli predefined macro documented here : #ifdef __cplusplus_cli using namespace System; namespace ENMFP { public ref struct Data { // ... }; } #endif // __cplusplus_cli 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9976194/find-programmatically-if-under-c-or-c-cli

This question already has answers here : Closed 7 years ago . Possible Duplicate: Inline property initialisation and trailing comma Working on one of my projects (C# 4.0, Visual Studio 2010), I've accidentally discovered that code like var obj = new { field1 = "Test", field2 = 3, } is compiled and executed OK without any errors or even warnings and works exactly like var obj = new { field1 = "Test", field2 = 3 } Why does compiler tolerate the trailing coma in first example? Is this a bug in compiler or such behavior does have some purpose? Thanks To determine whether or not it's a bug in the