cluster-computing

How to call MATLAB executable for Python on cluster?

老子叫甜甜 提交于 2019-12-06 15:55:08
I am using a python-matlab-bridge that calls MATLAB from python by starting it on a ZMQ socket. On my own computer, I hand the bridge the location of the executable (in this case MATLAB 2014B): executable='/Applications/MATLAB_R2014b.app/bin/matlab' and everything works as required and the printed statement is: Starting MATLAB on ZMQ socket ipc:///tmp/pymatbridge-49ce56ed-f5b4-43c4-8d53-8ae0cd30136d Now I want to do the same on a cluster. Through module avail I find there are two MATLAB versions (2015a and 2016b) available and located at the following path: /opt/ud/LOCAL/etc/modulefiles/matlab

Create node cluster's focal points by data attribute in d3?

一曲冷凌霜 提交于 2019-12-06 14:19:25
I'm trying to force nodes into different clusters in force layout based on a certain attribute in the data like "group." I'm adapting the code from Mike Bostock's multi foci force layout example ( code , example ) and I've been successful in adding in my own data but I haven't been able to specify how many clusters there are and how to assign a node to a cluster. I'm relatively new to d3 and JavaScript and I haven't been able to find many examples of multi foci applications. Here's my d3 code, any help or input is appreciated: var width = 960, height = 500; var fill = d3.scale.category10(); d3

Is it possible to start multi physical node hadoop clustster using docker?

大城市里の小女人 提交于 2019-12-06 13:44:11
I've seen searching for a way to start docker on multiple physical machines and connect them to a hadoop cluster, so far I only found ways to start a cluster locally on 1 machine. Is there a way to do this? shankarsh15 You can very well provision a multinode hadoop cluster with docker. Please look at some posts below which will give you some insights on doing it: http://blog.sequenceiq.com/blog/2014/06/19/multinode-hadoop-cluster-on-docker/ Run a hadoop cluster on docker containers 来源: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37267304/is-it-possible-to-start-multi-physical-node-hadoop-clustster

Connecting to Zookeeper in a Apache Kafka Multi Node cluster

瘦欲@ 提交于 2019-12-06 13:33:35
I followed the following instructions to set up a multi node kafka cluster. Now, how to connect to the zookeeper ? Is it okay to connect to just one zookeeper from the Producer/consumer side in JAVA or is there a way to connect all the zookeeper nodes ? Setting a multi node Apache ZooKeeper cluster On every node of the cluster add the following lines to the file kafka/config/zookeeper.properties server.1=zNode01:2888:3888 server.2=zNode02:2888:3888 server.3=zNode03:2888:3888 #add here more servers if you want initLimit=5 syncLimit=2 On every node of the cluster create a file called myid in the

CTDB Samba failover not highly available

大城市里の小女人 提交于 2019-12-06 12:21:36
问题 My Setup 3 nodes running ceph + cephfs 2 of these nodes running CTDB & Samba 1 client (not one of the 3 servers) It is a Lab setup, so only one nic per server=node, one subnet as well as all Ceph components plus Samba on the same servers. I'm aware, that this is not the way to go. The problem I want to host a clustered Samba file share on top of Ceph with ctdb. I followed the CTDB documentation (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/CTDB_and_Clustered_Samba#Configuring_Clusters_with_CTDB) and

How do I set up a simple dockerized RabbitMQ cluster?

假如想象 提交于 2019-12-06 11:39:05
问题 I've been doing a bit of reading up about setting up a dockerized RabbitMQ cluster and google turns up all sorts of results for doing so on the same machine. I am trying to set up a RabbitMQ cluster across multiple machines. I have three machines with the names dockerswarmmodemaster1 , dockerswarmmodemaster2 and dockerswarmmodemaster3 On the first machine (dockerswarmmodemaster1), I issue the following command: docker run -d -p 4369:4369 -p 5671:5671 -p 5672:5672 -p 15671:15671 -p 15672:15672

Clustering Node JS in Heavy Traffic Production Environment

僤鯓⒐⒋嵵緔 提交于 2019-12-06 11:27:55
问题 I have a web service handling http requests to redirect to specific URLs. Right the CPU is hammered at about 5 million hits per day, but I need to scale it up to handle 20 million plus. This is a production environment so I am a little apprehensive about the new Node Cluster method b/c it is still listed as experimental. I need suggestions on how to cluster Node on handle the traffic on a linux server. Any thoughts? 回答1: 5 million per day is equivalent to 57.87 per second, and 25 million is

MPI code does not work with 2 nodes, but with 1

余生颓废 提交于 2019-12-06 11:15:14
Super EDIT: Adding the broadcast step, will result in ncols to get printed by the two processes by the master node (from which I can check the output). But why? I mean, all variables that are broadcast have already a value in the line of their declaration!!! (off-topic image ). I have some code based on this example . I checked that cluster configuration is OK, with this simple program, which also printed the IP of the machine that it would run onto: int main (int argc, char *argv[]) { int rank, size; MPI_Init (&argc, &argv); /* starts MPI */ MPI_Comm_rank (MPI_COMM_WORLD, &rank); /* get

Application-level JOIN with WHERE and ORDER BY on N postgresql shards

允我心安 提交于 2019-12-06 09:37:15
问题 I have a postgresql cluster with different tables residing within different shards (different physical postgresql servers). EG: shard A + user_group (user_group_id, user_group_name) shard B + user (user_id, user_group_id (NULL), user_name) shard C + comment (comment_id, user_id, comment_content) I need to run queries that if all 3 tables where on the same shard, it would look something like: SELECT comment_id, comment_content FROM comment INNER JOIN user ON comment.user_id = user.user_id LEFT

How to read individual sectors/clusters using DeviceIoControl() in Windows?

倖福魔咒の 提交于 2019-12-06 09:33:56
问题 I dropped my laptop while Windows was preparing to hibernate and as a result, I got a head crash on the hard drive. (Teaches me to get a hard drive and/or laptop with a freefall sensor next time around.) Anyway, running SpinRite to try to recover the data has resulted in all the spare sectors on the disk to all be all used up for all the recoverable sectors so far. SpinRite is still going right now, but since there won't be anymore spare sectors to be used, I think it'll be a fruitless