Cascade

ON CASCADE DELETE on JPA2 many-to-many relationship

南楼画角 提交于 2019-12-06 05:38:35
问题 I have read a lot of topics regarding cascading and many-to-many associations, but I haven't been able to find an answer to my particular question. I have a many-to-many relationship between UserProfiles and Roles. When I remove a UserProfile I want the associated records in the join table (userprofile2role) to be removed by the database, so with an actual SQL 'ON DELETE CASCADE' action. Is this possible? Whatever I try, Hibernate always creates the UserProfile table without specifying ON

Grails belongsTo cascade on delete when belongsTo specifies multiple classes?

旧巷老猫 提交于 2019-12-06 02:04:12
class Owner { static hasMany = Dog } class Sitter { static hasMany = Dog } class Dog { static belongsTo = [Owner, Sitter] } My question is: If I create a Dog instance D, a Owner instance O, a Sitter instance S and associate D with both O and S, what happens to O when S gets deleted? Would O still have D? Since it's a cascade-delete, both S and D would get deleted, right? When what happens to O? Would it still have D? I have tested it, it follows the cascade rule: if you delete Owner, Dog will be deleted by cascade, but Sitter will remain. And it's reasonable: Sitter is independent with Owner.

T-SQL: DROP Table cascade constraints equivalent?

拥有回忆 提交于 2019-12-05 23:19:43
问题 In oracle, I can issue a DROP TABLE ... cascade constraints and it won't complain about FKs, etc. Is there an equivalent in T-SQL? 回答1: NO, IN SSMS right click on the table, and select "script table as" then "drop to", then "new window", "file..." or "clipboard" and it will produce a script that will include all the necessary drops of FKs etc. 回答2: For those who got here in the hope of a more generally applicable answer This will find the constraint, drop it, and then the column Thanks and a

免费12个月!阿里云助力中小企业0成本上云

徘徊边缘 提交于 2019-12-05 19:58:15
最新消息,阿里云宣布为企业用户推出云服务器免费12个月扶持计划,助力中小企业0成本上云。阿里云表示,该计划每年投入2000万,超5万中小企业受益,本计划已于2019年11月27日上线。 阿里云智能总裁张建锋在2019阿里云峰会上海站上提出“全面上云的拐点到了!”为了更好的帮助中小企业成长,帮助企业从传统IT向云计算全面转移,阿里云也加大对中小企业全面扶持上云的力度。虽然,现在已有上万家企业将IT系统全面迁移到阿里云,比如飞利浦中国、迅雷、万科物业、百丽、居然之家、西贝莜面村等。但目前更广大的中小企业上云的需求普遍仍然未被满足。经调研,目前部署在所有公共云上的工作负载仍然不超过总负载的20%,这意味着仍有80%的工作负载仍然部署在线下的各个IDC机房,自建机房以及企业自己维护的服务器上,为了能引导企业消除上云的心理门槛,降低企业上云的成本,阿里云推出了企业免费12个月扶持计划,助力中小企业0成本上云。 免费用一年 可满足企业建站、开发测试等场景 本次推出的企业免费12个月计划,将为中小企业提供最新一代入门级云服务器—突发性能实例T6(以下简称T6)相比上一代T5实例,其规格基准性能提升,性价比最高提升180%。最新一代产品具体以下三个特性: 基于阿里云自研神龙芯片和轻量化Hypervisor CPU处理器采用2.5 GHz主频的最新一代Intel ® Xeon ®

tsql script to add delete cascade to existing tables

此生再无相见时 提交于 2019-12-05 16:32:55
问题 is there a script that can be used to enable cascaded deletion for existing tables. Thanks. 回答1: ALTER TABLE [wm].[TABLE_NAME] WITH NOCHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_TABLE_NAME_PARENT_TABLE_NAME] FOREIGN KEY([FOREIGN_KEY]) REFERENCES [wm].[PARENT_TABLE_NAME] ([PRIVATE_KEY]) ON DELETE CASCADE GO TABLE_NAME : name of the table where the children are stored. PARENT_TABLE_NAME : name of the table where the parents are stored. This placeholders can be equal FK_TABLE_NAME_PARENT_TABLE_NAME : just name for

MySQL外键约束

感情迁移 提交于 2019-12-05 15:08:31
CASCADE :父表delete、update的时候,子表会delete、update掉关联记录; SET NULL :父表delete、update的时候,子表会将关联记录的外键字段所在列设为null,所以注意在设计子表时外键不能设为not null; RESTRICT :如果想要删除父表的记录时,而在子表中有关联该父表的记录,则不允许删除父表中的记录; NO ACTION :同 RESTRICT,也是首先先检查外键; 来源: https://my.oschina.net/depeng414/blog/3133606

What Does Rails Do With Both :dependent => :destroy and cascade delete/nullify/restrict

落爺英雄遲暮 提交于 2019-12-05 13:32:09
问题 I'm trying to decide how best to set up (if at all) foreign key constraints for my rails application. I have a model Response that belongs_to a Prompt . I would like to use :dependent => :destroy to have destroy called on every Response that belongs to a deleted Prompt and I'm trying to decide what delete constraint I should place on my foreign key. In short I want advice about how I can get best take advantage of both the destroy method on dependent objects and foreign key constraints to

Merge Primary Keys - Cascade Update

大城市里の小女人 提交于 2019-12-05 10:44:59
Is there a way to merge two primary keys into one and then cascade update all affected relationships? Here's the scenario: Customers (idCustomer int PK, Company varchar(50), etc) CustomerContacts (idCustomerContact int PK, idCustomer int FK, Name varchar(50), etc) CustomerNotes (idCustomerNote int PK, idCustomer int FK, Note Text, etc) Sometimes customers need to be merged into one. For example, you have a customer with the id of 1 and another with the id of 2. You want to merge both, so that everything that was 2 is now 1. I know I could write a script that updates all affected tables one by

FOREIGN KEY references same table's column. Can't insert values

五迷三道 提交于 2019-12-05 08:05:49
I created table with FOREIGN KEY and can't insert anything. CREATE TABLE menus ( id int(10), parent_id int(10), label varchar(255), PRIMARY KEY (id), FOREIGN KEY (parent_id) REFERENCES menus (id) ); I need FOREIGN KEY to automatically delete children when parent was deleted. This table was successfully created but I can't insert anything. INSERT INTO `menus` (`parent_id`, `label`) VALUES ('1', 'label1'); or INSERT INTO `menus` (`label`) VALUES ( 'label1'); #1452 - Cannot add or update a child row: a foreign key constraint fails I really don't want look for any children in php code so I need

Hibernate doesn't generate cascade

倾然丶 夕夏残阳落幕 提交于 2019-12-05 03:29:42
I have a set hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto to create so that Hibernate creates the tables in mysql for me. However, it doesn't seem that hibernate correctly adds Cascade on the references in the table. It does however work when I for instance delete a row, and I have a delete cascade as hibernate annotation . So I guess that means that Hibernate reads the annoation on runtime, and perform cascading manually? Is that normal behavior? For instance: @Entity class Report { @OneToOne(cascade = CascadeType.ALL) public File getPdf() { return pdf; } } Here I have set cascade to ALL. However, when running