callstack

The problem is not getting the callstack in general, which can be done as described here: http://eriwen.com/javascript/js-stack-trace/ but rather in accessing the callstack that triggered the event, from the handler of the event. In particular I'm interested in logging the callstack from the window error event window.onerror = function(msg, url, line) { //callstack // would be nice to have. //log callstack or whatever. (note this can be done w/ ajax and service, and is not the question at hand. } but I do know how to log the error. (I use jquery's .ajax , and a service) Will browsers make this

How to I get a backtrace in Javascript? Ideal features: entry function name, or some meaningful identifier for anonymous functions, argument list at each level, line numbers. Can this be done in standard ECMAScript? If not, can it be done in the common web browser dialects? Thanks. Edit -- Thanks for your suggestions. My dialect doesnot support arguments.caller or arguments.callee . I can do this: try { let x = null; x .foo (); } catch (e) { debug (dump (e.stack)); } Which gets me the information as a string, which is okay for at-a-glance, but it would be a great help to walk e.stack . Does it

Would it be possible to see the CallStack in VBA for MS Access 2003? That is to say, would it be possible to see from what procedure or function another function was called? There is no programmatic way in VBA to view the call stack that I know of. The usual solution to this problem is to use some structure to track calling of functions, but it always seems like a kludge to me, and really of use only when programming (not at runtime), in which case it seems to me that the VBE's built-in capability for seeing the call stack is sufficient. And, BTW, I always put the call stack button on my VBE

The way I've been taught for quite some time is that when I run a program, the first thing that immediately goes on the stack is a stack frame for the main method. And if I call on a function called foo() from within main, then a stack frame that is the size of the local variables ( automatic objects) and the parameters gets pushed onto the stack as well. However, I've ran into a couple things that contradict this. And I'm hoping someone can clear up my confusion or explain why there really aren't any contradictions. First contradiction: In the book, "The C++ Programming Language" 3rd edition

Way to get the Frame Pointer On a Demo App running on iPhone 5s Device / Xcode 7, I tried to get the frame pointer of an arbitrary thread using thread_get_state , but always result in an incorrect one : - (BOOL)fillThreadState:(thread_t)thread intoMachineContext:(_STRUCT_MCONTEXT *)machineContext { mach_msg_type_number_t state_count = MACHINE_THREAD_STATE_COUNT; kern_return_t kr = thread_get_state(thread, MACHINE_THREAD_STATE, (thread_state_t)&machineContext->__ss, &state_count); if (kr != KERN_SUCCESS) { char *str = mach_error_string(kr); printf("%s\n", str); return NO; } return YES; } I read

How can I get a full call stack for a c++ application developed with Visual Studio 2005? I would like to have a full call stack including the code in the system libraries. Do I have to change some settings in Visual Studio, or do I have to install additional software? Get debug information for all project dependencies. This is specified under the "Configuration Properties -> C/C++ -> General" section of the project properties. On the menu, go to "Tools -> Options" then select "Debugging -> Symbols". Add a new symbol location (the folder icon) that points to Microsoft's free symbol server

This might sound stupid but I am still not clear about the Java Stack and the memory heap. What I know from studying is following: 1) All the method calls goes on stack. 2) All the memory allocated locally goes on memory heap (not very clear about this point) 3) All the memory allocated by new operator (either in a method or in a class) goes on memory heap. I am worried about the below cases: 1) If I create a int variable in a method and return it, where does it go ( I believe it goes on stack, but need clarification). 2) If I create a new object in a method it goes on heap memory as it exists

Hello people I hope you an help me out with this problem: I am currently implementing an interpreter for a scripting language. The language needs a native call interface to C functions, like java has JNI. My problem is, that i want to call the original C functions without writing a wrapper function, which converts the call stack of my scripting language into the C call stack. This means, that I need a way, to generate argument lists of C functions at runtime. Example: void a(int a, int b) { printf("function a called %d", a + b); } void b(double a, int b, double c) { printf("function b called