branch

Commit a change to more than one branch in Git

由 ∥☆過路亽．° 提交于 2019-12-22 05:53:45
问题 Typical usage scenario: I have master, branch_foo and branch_bar. All are up to date. Now, I do a "git checkout master" and work on a bug fix. Lets say that fix was on a tracked file that is in the same state on all branches - ie. before the fix, a diff of the file from each branch results in no differences. Is there a way to commit this fix to all branches? 回答1: I expect git cherry-pick is what you want. After committing the fix to the first branch, you can use git cherry-pick to merge it

Does git branch -m have side effects for other developers?

由 那年仲夏 提交于 2019-12-22 04:49:10
问题 We've already learned how to switch which branch points to what using git branch -m . If I do this, is it going to make life difficult for the other people pulling from my repository? Say I do a bunch of stuff on a branch topic1 and then do a git branch -m master old_master git branch -m topic1 master git push origin master and then somebody else pulls master from the my remote repository, what will they have to do to make everything point to the right place? Will I have to tell everybody to

confused about creating nested branches in git

由 冷暖自知 提交于 2019-12-22 04:42:33
问题 I just started using git and started collaborating with other developers on same code. I have worked a little with SVN before but never had to collaborate with other people on my codebase. Now with collaborators working on same code, I need an efficient workflow. While searching for such, I found this, and it seems like a good workflow for our requirement. My repository resides in a local machine. I created the repository with git init --bare . I added the initial codes to master and pushed

Force a branch naming convention in Azure DevOps Git

由 不羁岁月 提交于 2019-12-22 04:38:07
问题 We use Git hosted in Azure DevOps for all of our source code. So far we have used Git Hooks to ensure that team members follow a branch naming convention {branchtype}/{username}/{friendlyname}/{workitemtype}{workitemid} . Examples: dev/dparkar/addauth/ta123456 hf/jsmith/memoryleak/bu11111 The branch naming convention allow us to clearly understand whether it's a regular development branch or a hotfix branch and which work item it is associated with, among other things. To setup Git Hooks

How to Remove a Branch from the Middle of the Hierarchy?

由 不打扰是莪最后的温柔 提交于 2019-12-22 03:48:40
问题 I have a Team Project created with the "Standard" branch pattern from the ALM Rangers' Branching guidance: After creating it, I found that I only really needed the "Basic" pattern. That is, I don't need the "Service Pack" branch. Is there a way for me to remove the "Service Pack" branch and "heal" the hierarchy so that "Release" is under "Main" in the hierarchy? Right now, every changeset in the "Service Pack" hierarchy has a corresponding changeset in the "Release" hierarchy, as "Service

Is a TFS branch a physical or logical snapshot?

由 回眸只為那壹抹淺笑 提交于 2019-12-22 03:21:07
问题 When code is branched in TFS using the branch method, is the code physically or logically branched? By logical, I mean is it just a changeset (changed deltas) or are all of the files copied? 回答1: Branched files are not copied within the TFS database. A new version of the file will not be created until the branched version is modified. This is why creating a branch on a large project does not take forever. Source: http://www.codeplex.com/BranchingGuidance/Wiki/View.aspx?title=Isolation%20for

How to find out who delete a branch at git? [duplicate]

由 末鹿安然 提交于 2019-12-21 23:54:02
问题 This question already has answers here : Find who deleted a git branch (2 answers) Closed 5 years ago . I work at the team which works with git repository. We have an origin and several local copies. Everybody interacts with origin by different means: from Unix, from Windows, Unix shell, Windows shell, NetBeans, PHPStorm. It happens that somebody deleted several local and remote branches. We already restored them. But how to find the person who is responsible for it? I checked git reflog ,

How do I keep my branches up to date with the 'default' branch under Mercurial?

由 六眼飞鱼酱① 提交于 2019-12-21 22:04:21
问题 Let's say I have the following workflow with Mercurial: stable (clone on server) default (branch) development (clone on server) default (branch) bugs (branch) developer1 (clone on local machine) developer2 (clone on local machine) developer3 (clone on local machine) feature1 (branch) developer3 (clone on local machine) feature2 (branch) developer1 (clone on local machine) developer2 (clone on local machine) My main line of development which is always in a release ready state is 'default'. So

Best Practice: How to handle code differences for iOS App when creating free and paid version?

由 三世轮回 提交于 2019-12-21 21:43:19
问题 I want to release two versions, of my iOS App on the AppStore. One is paid and other is free. As of now my code is finished for the paid App. Now I want to add more code for iAd and InAppPurchase's for the free app. What is the best approach for maintaining the two versions? I was thinking about copying the Xcode Project or creating a branch in my git repo. 回答1: If you branch or copy the project you're creating a maintenance nightmare for yourself down the road. Create a separate target in

Git -- 创建与合并分支

由 半腔热情 提交于 2019-12-21 20:06:00
在 版本回退 里，你已经知道，每次提交，Git都把它们串成一条时间线，这条时间线就是一个分支。截止到目前，只有一条时间线，在Git里，这个分支叫主分支，即 master 分支。 HEAD 严格来说不是指向提交，而是指向 master ， master 才是指向提交的，所以， HEAD 指向的就是当前分支。 一开始的时候， master 分支是一条线，Git用 master 指向最新的提交，再用 HEAD 指向 master ，就能确定当前分支，以及当前分支的提交点： 每次提交， master 分支都会向前移动一步，这样，随着你不断提交， master 分支的线也越来越长： 当我们创建新的分支，例如 dev 时，Git新建了一个指针叫 dev ，指向 master 相同的提交，再把 HEAD 指向 dev ，就表示当前分支在 dev 上： 你看，Git创建一个分支很快，因为除了增加一个 dev 指针，改改 HEAD 的指向，工作区的文件都没有任何变化！ 不过，从现在开始，对工作区的修改和提交就是针对 dev 分支了，比如 新 提交 一次后， dev 指针往前移动一步，而 master 指针不变 ： 假如我们在 dev 上的工作完成了，就可以把 dev 合并到 master 上。Git怎么合并呢？最简单的方法，就是直接把 master 指向 dev 的当前提交，就完成了合并：
订阅 branch