branch

问题 Relatively simple question but I can't find much on the internet. All my search results simply show how to use git branches but doesn't explain how its different. I know that with SVN, creating a new branch of the trunk means to create a full copy of the trunk, into the 'branches' directory, and I also know that Git does not create full copy like SVN - so what does it do? This is more for writing facts in my DVCS research documentation rather than anything. Perhaps an extension to this would

问题 I'd like to ask why the BLT instruction is not a part of MIPS ISA. Instead they actually make it a pseudo-instruction for assembly programmers. I just couldn't recognize the difference between BLT and BLTZ (which is a part of MIPS ISA) from hardware implementation point of view. By the way the book "Computer Organization and Design" says : Heeding von Neumann's warning about the simplicity of the "equipment" the MIPS architecture doesn't include branch on less than because it's too

问题 I'd like to ask why the BLT instruction is not a part of MIPS ISA. Instead they actually make it a pseudo-instruction for assembly programmers. I just couldn't recognize the difference between BLT and BLTZ (which is a part of MIPS ISA) from hardware implementation point of view. By the way the book "Computer Organization and Design" says : Heeding von Neumann's warning about the simplicity of the "equipment" the MIPS architecture doesn't include branch on less than because it's too

问题 I use an ant file to build a java project in mercurial through hudson. The mailnine has a hudson job running just fine. Recently a new branch was created and pushed to the server by commnd line: hg branch newbranch hg commit hg push -f The mainine does not contain these changes and still builds fine. I have set up a new job with the same setting as mainline (in fact copied mainline job in hudson), and specified the newbranch. However, the newbranch job builds code identical to mainline. If I

问题 In my current project (team of five developers) all developers use their own TFS branch (named per developer). From time to time they will merge into the main development branch. The argument for using branches per developer is: too much went wrong when they worked in one branch. Developers work mainly remote but use one common TFS and AD accounts (VPN connections). I would like to get opinions whether this sort of collaboration is thought to be good practise, OK under some circumstances or

问题 I have an issue with a feature branch that I'm trying to merge to trunk . The message that I'm getting is this: ➜ trunk svn merge https://svn.vcshost.org/svn/domaindev/branches/Master-Project/feature-branch svn: E160013: '/svn/domaindev/!svn/bc/112033/trunk/Master-Project' path not found Any help would be greatly appreciated. I tried merging from trunk to this feature branch and it worked flawlessly, also merging other branches to trunk works okay, so I'm guessing that there's a problem with

问题 I don't think I'm doing something right. I am using subversion as my vcs for our organizations website. I am the sole developer and I'm using bugzilla as my bugtracking system. I've got bugzilla and svn loosely coupled using the bugtraq properties so that I can link from my comments to bugzilla. What I'm doing right now is whenever I get a request to perform any work on the website (enhancement, breakfix, content change) I create a bug [xx] in bugzilla then create a branch named bug[xx].

问题 If I was to make an error in a file that I have marked resolved is there a way to go back to having the file in it's original conflicted state without reverting all changes and reattempting the merge? 回答1: No, there is no automatic way to do that. If you want to be able to do that, you'll have to manually back up the .mine file ahead of time so that you can get it back if needed. 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5381263/subversion-reverting-resolved-file

问题 If I was to make an error in a file that I have marked resolved is there a way to go back to having the file in it's original conflicted state without reverting all changes and reattempting the merge? 回答1: No, there is no automatic way to do that. If you want to be able to do that, you'll have to manually back up the .mine file ahead of time so that you can get it back if needed. 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5381263/subversion-reverting-resolved-file

问题 So, I've got a ton of files open in my vim buffer, and I'm working on a feature branch with git. Suddenly, I realize that I need to revert back to my master branch to make a quick fix. After making my commits, I leave my vim session open and switch back over to the master branch. However, when I try and load the files I need from the buffer, I now get the message Warning: File "<filename>" has changed since editing started This makes complete since to me. The file in the buffer is from my