bayeux

Faye vs. Socket.IO (and Juggernaut)

感情迁移 提交于 2019-11-29 18:35:58
Socket.IO seems to be the most popular and active WebSocket emulation library. Juggernaut uses it to create a complete pub/sub system. Faye is also popular and active, and has its own javascript library, making its complete functionality comparable to Juggernaut. Juggernaut uses node for its server, and Faye can use either node or rack. Juggernaut uses Redis for persistence ( correction: it uses Redis for pub/sub), and Faye only keeps state in memory. Is everything above accurate? Faye says it implements Bayeux -- i think Juggernaut does not do this -- is that because Juggernaut is lower level

Faye vs. Socket.IO (and Juggernaut)

北城余情 提交于 2019-11-28 13:14:31
问题 Socket.IO seems to be the most popular and active WebSocket emulation library. Juggernaut uses it to create a complete pub/sub system. Faye is also popular and active, and has its own javascript library, making its complete functionality comparable to Juggernaut. Juggernaut uses node for its server, and Faye can use either node or rack. Juggernaut uses Redis for persistence ( correction: it uses Redis for pub/sub), and Faye only keeps state in memory. Is everything above accurate? Faye says