assign

Error: Assigning to an array from an initializer list

假如想象 提交于 2019-11-28 00:44:50
I have a class such as: class dialog { public: double dReturnType[][5][3]; }; #include <cstdlib> #include <iostream> include <string> using namespace std; #include "dialog.h"; int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { dialog People; People.dReturnType[0][1] = {1.2,2.3,6.6}; return 0; } It returns: [Warning] extended initializer lists only available with -std=c++11 or -std=gnu11 [enabled by default] [Error]: assigning to an array from an initializer list I've looked it up online a bit and really couldn't find a way to get around this. I'd prefer not editing the class within it's on class file (kinda

Updating one field in every element of a Matlab struct array

a 夏天 提交于 2019-11-27 22:48:09
Suppose I have a struct array arr , where each element has a bunch of fields, including one called val . I'd like to increment each element's val field by some constant amount, like so: for i = 1:length(arr) arr(i).val = arr(i).val + 3; end This obviously works, but I feel there should be a way to do this in just one line of code (and no for loop). The best I've come up with is two lines and requires a temp variable: newVals = num2cell([arr.val] + 3); [arr.val] = deal(newVals{:}); Any ideas? Thanks. Just a note, the deal isn't necessary there: [arr.val] = newVals{:}; % achieves the same as

AngularJS: dynamically assign controller from ng-repeat

做~自己de王妃 提交于 2019-11-27 21:12:10
I'm trying to dynamically assign a controller for included template like so: <section ng-repeat="panel in panels"> <div ng-include="'path/to/file.html'" ng-controller="{{panel}}"></div> </section> But Angular complains that {{panel}} is undefined. I'm guessing that {{panel}} isn't defined yet (because I can echo out {{panel}} inside the template). I've seen plenty of examples of people setting ng-controller equal to a variable like so: ng-controller="template.ctrlr" . But, without creating a duplicate concurrant loop, I can't figure out how to have the value of {{panel}} available when ng

pandas assign with new column name as string

折月煮酒 提交于 2019-11-27 13:41:43
问题 I recently discovered pandas "assign" method which I find very elegant. My issue is that the name of the new column is assigned as keyword, so it cannot have spaces or dashes in it. df = DataFrame({'A': range(1, 11), 'B': np.random.randn(10)}) df.assign(ln_A = lambda x: np.log(x.A)) A B ln_A 0 1 0.426905 0.000000 1 2 -0.780949 0.693147 2 3 -0.418711 1.098612 3 4 -0.269708 1.386294 4 5 -0.274002 1.609438 5 6 -0.500792 1.791759 6 7 1.649697 1.945910 7 8 -1.495604 2.079442 8 9 0.549296 2.197225

Initializing a vector of vectors having a fixed size with boost assign

房东的猫 提交于 2019-11-27 09:37:38
问题 Having a vector of vector with a fixed size, vector<vector<int> > v(10); I would like to initialize it so that it has in all elements a one dimensional vector with initialized value (for example 1). I have used Boost Assign as follows v= repeat(10,list_of(list_of(1))); and I've got a compilation error error: no matching function for call to ‘repeat(boost::assign_detail::generic_list<int>)’ Could you please tell me how to do that. Thanks in advance 回答1: This doesn't use boost::assign but does

In C, why can't I assign a string to a char array after it's declared?

拟墨画扇 提交于 2019-11-27 05:06:55
This has been bugging me for a while. struct person { char name[15]; int age; }; struct person me; me.name = "nikol"; when I compile I get this error: error: incompatible types when assigning to type ‘char[15]’ from type ‘char *’ am I missing something obvious here? Arrays are second-class citizens in C, they do not support assignment. char x[] = "This is initialization, not assignment, thus ok."; This does not work: x = "Compilation-error here, tried to assign to an array."; Use library-functions or manually copy every element for itself: #include <string.h> strcpy(x, "The library-solution to

Updating one field in every element of a Matlab struct array

冷暖自知 提交于 2019-11-27 04:36:29
问题 Suppose I have a struct array arr , where each element has a bunch of fields, including one called val . I'd like to increment each element's val field by some constant amount, like so: for i = 1:length(arr) arr(i).val = arr(i).val + 3; end This obviously works, but I feel there should be a way to do this in just one line of code (and no for loop). The best I've come up with is two lines and requires a temp variable: newVals = num2cell([arr.val] + 3); [arr.val] = deal(newVals{:}); Any ideas?

AngularJS: dynamically assign controller from ng-repeat

帅比萌擦擦* 提交于 2019-11-27 04:30:54
问题 I'm trying to dynamically assign a controller for included template like so: <section ng-repeat="panel in panels"> <div ng-include="'path/to/file.html'" ng-controller="{{panel}}"></div> </section> But Angular complains that {{panel}} is undefined. I'm guessing that {{panel}} isn't defined yet (because I can echo out {{panel}} inside the template). I've seen plenty of examples of people setting ng-controller equal to a variable like so: ng-controller="template.ctrlr" . But, without creating a

What is better in a foreach loop… using the & symbol or reassigning based on key?

家住魔仙堡 提交于 2019-11-27 01:58:30
Consider the following PHP Code: //Method 1 $array = array(1,2,3,4,5); foreach($array as $i=>$number){ $number++; $array[$i] = $number; } print_r($array); //Method 2 $array = array(1,2,3,4,5); foreach($array as &$number){ $number++; } print_r($array); Both methods accomplish the same task, one by assigning a reference and another by re-assigning based on key. I want to use good programming techniques in my work and I wonder which method is the better programming practice? Or is this one of those it doesn't really matter things? Since the highest scoring answer states that the second method is

property “assign” and “retain” for delegate

断了今生、忘了曾经 提交于 2019-11-27 01:52:22
问题 For iOS developers, delegates are used almost everywhere. And seems like that we need to use "assign" instead of retain for a delegate like this @property(assign) id delegate; The reason is to avoid the circular loop issue Why are Objective-C delegates usually given the property assign instead of retain? I saw a lot of code and they still used "retain". So the question here is will we still get the circular loop issue if we use retain for a delegate? Thanks 回答1: The documentation says: