Can't make Jackson and Lombok work together

蓝咒 提交于 2019-11-26 10:39:29

问题


I am experimenting in combining Jackson and Lombok. Those are my classes:

package testelombok;

import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonCreator;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonProperty;
import lombok.AllArgsConstructor;
import lombok.Value;
import lombok.experimental.Wither;

@Value
@Wither
@AllArgsConstructor(onConstructor=@__(@JsonCreator))
public class TestFoo {
    @JsonProperty(\"xoom\")
    private String x;
    private int z;
}
package testelombok;

import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
import com.xebia.jacksonlombok.JacksonLombokAnnotationIntrospector;
import java.io.IOException;

public class TestLombok {

    public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
        TestFoo tf = new TestFoo(\"a\", 5);
        System.out.println(tf.withX(\"b\"));
        ObjectMapper om = new ObjectMapper().setAnnotationIntrospector(new JacksonLombokAnnotationIntrospector());
        System.out.println(om.writeValueAsString(tf));
        TestFoo tf2 = om.readValue(om.writeValueAsString(tf), TestFoo.class);
        System.out.println(tf2);
    }

}

Those are the JARs that I\'m adding into the classpth:

  • Lombok: https://projectlombok.org/downloads/lombok.jar (version 1.16.10)

  • Jackson annotations: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/fasterxml/jackson/core/jackson-annotations/2.8.2/jackson-annotations-2.8.2.jar

  • Jackson core: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/fasterxml/jackson/core/jackson-core/2.8.2/jackson-core-2.8.2.jar

  • Jackson databind: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/fasterxml/jackson/core/jackson-databind/2.8.2/jackson-databind-2.8.2.jar

  • Jackson-lombok: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/io/paradoxical/jackson-lombok/1.1/jackson-lombok-1.1.jar

I am compiling it with Netbeans (I don\'t think that this is really relevant, but I am reporting this anyway to make it perfectly and faithfully reproducible). The five JARs above are kept in a folder called \"lib\" inside the project folder (along with \"src\", \"nbproject\", \"test\" and \"build\"). I added them to Netbeans via the \"Add JAR/Folder\" button in the project properties and they are listed in the exact order as the list above. The project is a standard \"Java application\" type project.

Further, the Netbeans project is configured to \"do NOT compile on save\", \"generate debugging info\", \"report deprecated APIs\", \"track java dependencies\", \"activacte annotation proccessing\" and \"activacte annotation proccessing in the editor\". No annotation processor or annotation processing option is explicitly configured in Netbeans. Also, the \"-Xlint:all\" command line option is passed in the compiler command line, and the compiler runs on an external VM.

My javac\'s version is 1.8.0_72 and my java\'s version is 1.8.0_72-b15. My Netbeans is 8.1.

My project compiles fine. However, it throws an exception in its execution. The exception don\'t seems to be anything that looks easily or obvious fixable. Here is the output, including the stacktrace:

TestFoo(x=b, z=5)
{\"z\":5,\"xoom\":\"a\"}
Exception in thread \"main\" com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonMappingException: Argument #0 of constructor [constructor for testelombok.TestFoo, annotations: {interface java.beans.ConstructorProperties=@java.beans.ConstructorProperties(value=[x, z]), interface com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonCreator=@com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonCreator(mode=DEFAULT)}] has no property name annotation; must have name when multiple-parameter constructor annotated as Creator
 at [Source: {\"z\":5,\"xoom\":\"a\"}; line: 1, column: 1]
    at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonMappingException.from(JsonMappingException.java:296)
    at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.DeserializerCache._createAndCache2(DeserializerCache.java:269)
    at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.DeserializerCache._createAndCacheValueDeserializer(DeserializerCache.java:244)
    at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.DeserializerCache.findValueDeserializer(DeserializerCache.java:142)
    at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.DeserializationContext.findRootValueDeserializer(DeserializationContext.java:475)
    at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper._findRootDeserializer(ObjectMapper.java:3890)
    at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper._readMapAndClose(ObjectMapper.java:3785)
    at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper.readValue(ObjectMapper.java:2833)
    at testelombok.TestLombok.main(TestLombok.java:14)
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Argument #0 of constructor [constructor for testelombok.TestFoo, annotations: {interface java.beans.ConstructorProperties=@java.beans.ConstructorProperties(value=[x, z]), interface com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonCreator=@com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonCreator(mode=DEFAULT)}] has no property name annotation; must have name when multiple-parameter constructor annotated as Creator
    at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.BasicDeserializerFactory._addDeserializerConstructors(BasicDeserializerFactory.java:511)
    at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.BasicDeserializerFactory._constructDefaultValueInstantiator(BasicDeserializerFactory.java:323)
    at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.BasicDeserializerFactory.findValueInstantiator(BasicDeserializerFactory.java:253)
    at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.BeanDeserializerFactory.buildBeanDeserializer(BeanDeserializerFactory.java:219)
    at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.BeanDeserializerFactory.createBeanDeserializer(BeanDeserializerFactory.java:141)
    at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.DeserializerCache._createDeserializer2(DeserializerCache.java:406)
    at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.DeserializerCache._createDeserializer(DeserializerCache.java:352)
    at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.DeserializerCache._createAndCache2(DeserializerCache.java:264)
    ... 7 more

I already tried about randomly poking with the @Value and @AllArgsConstructor annotations, but I couldn\'t make it any better.

I google\'d the exception and found an old bug report on jackson, and another one that is open, but seems to be related to something else. However, this still do not tells anything about what is this bug or how to fix it. Also, I could not find anything useful looking that somewhere else.

Since what I am trying to do is very basic usage of both lombok and jackson, it seems odd that I couldn\'t find any more useful information about how to workaround this issue. Maybe I missed something?

Other than just saying \"don\'t use lombok\" or \"don\'t use jackson\", do anybody has any idea about how to solve this?


回答1:


If you want immutable but a json serializable POJO using lombok and jackson. Use jacksons new annotation on your lomboks builder @JsonPOJOBuilder(withPrefix = "") I tried this solution and it works very well. Sample usage

import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.annotation.JsonDeserialize;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.annotation.JsonPOJOBuilder;
import lombok.Builder;
import lombok.Value;

@JsonDeserialize(builder = Detail.DetailBuilder.class)
@Value
@Builder
public class Detail {

    private String url;
    private String userName;
    private String password;
    private String scope;

    @JsonPOJOBuilder(withPrefix = "")
    public static class DetailBuilder {

    }
}

If you have too many classes with @Builder and you want don't want the boilerplate code empty annotation you can override the annotation interceptor to have empty withPrefix

mapper.setAnnotationIntrospector(new JacksonAnnotationIntrospector() {
        @Override
        public JsonPOJOBuilder.Value findPOJOBuilderConfig(AnnotatedClass ac) {
            if (ac.hasAnnotation(JsonPOJOBuilder.class)) {//If no annotation present use default as empty prefix
                return super.findPOJOBuilderConfig(ac);
            }
            return new JsonPOJOBuilder.Value("build", "");
        }
    });

And you can remove the empty builder class with @JsonPOJOBuilder annotation.




回答2:


Immutable + Lombok + Jackson can be achieved in next way:

import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
import lombok.AccessLevel;
import lombok.AllArgsConstructor;
import lombok.NoArgsConstructor;
import lombok.Value;

@Value
@NoArgsConstructor(force = true, access = AccessLevel.PRIVATE)
@AllArgsConstructor
public class LocationDto {

    double longitude;
    double latitude;
}

class ImmutableWithLombok {

    public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
        ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();

        String stringJsonRepresentation = objectMapper.writeValueAsString(new LocationDto(22.11, 33.33));
        System.out.println(stringJsonRepresentation);

        LocationDto locationDto = objectMapper.readValue(stringJsonRepresentation, LocationDto.class);
        System.out.println(locationDto);
    }
}



回答3:


I had exactly the same issue, "solved" it by adding the suppressConstructorProperties = true parameter (using your example):

@Value
@Wither
@AllArgsConstructor(suppressConstructorProperties = true)
public class TestFoo {
    @JsonProperty("xoom")
    private String x;
    private int z;
}

Jackson apparently does not like the java.beans.ConstructorProperties annotation added to constructors. The suppressConstructorProperties = true parameter tells Lombok not to add it (it does by default).




回答4:


@AllArgsConstructor(suppressConstructorProperties = true) is deprecated. Define lombok.anyConstructor.suppressConstructorProperties=true (https://projectlombok.org/features/configuration) and change POJO's lombok annotation from @Value to @Data + @NoArgsConstructor + @AllArgsConstructor works for me.




回答5:


I tried several of the above and they were all temperamental. What really worked for me is the the answer I found here.

on your project's root directory add a file (if you haven't done already)

lombok.config

and inside paste this

lombok.anyConstructor.addConstructorProperties=true

Then you can define your pojos like the following:

@Data
@AllArgsConstructor
public class MyPojo {

    @JsonProperty("Description")
    private String description;
    @JsonProperty("ErrorCode")
    private String errorCode;
}



回答6:


For me it worked when I have updated lombok version to: 'org.projectlombok:lombok:1.18.0'




回答7:


You can get Jackson to play with just about anything if you use its "mixin" pattern. Basically, it gives you a way to add Jackson annotations onto an existing class without actually modifying that class. I'm leaning towards recommending it here rather than a Lombok solution because this is solves a problem Jackson is having with a Jackson feature, so it's more likely to work long-term.




回答8:


You need to have this module as well. https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-modules-java8

then turn on -parameters flag for your compiler.

<build>
    <pluginManagement>
        <plugins>
            <plugin>
                <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
                <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
                <version>3.7.0</version>
                <configuration>
                    <compilerArgs>
                        <arg>-parameters</arg>
                    </compilerArgs>
                </configuration>
            </plugin>



回答9:


I've all my classes annotated like this:

@JsonAutoDetect(fieldVisibility = Visibility.ANY)
@JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_DEFAULT)
@Data
@Accessors(fluent = true)
@NoArgsConstructor
@AllArgsConstructor

It worked with all Lombok and Jackson versions for, at least, a couple of years.

Example:

@JsonAutoDetect(fieldVisibility = Visibility.ANY)
@JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_DEFAULT)
@Data
@Accessors(fluent = true)
@NoArgsConstructor
@AllArgsConstructor
public class Person {
    String id;
    String first;
    String last;
}

And that's it. Lombok and Jackson play together like a charm.




回答10:


@JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL)
@Data
public class Person {
   String id;
   String first;
   String last;
}

Additional to the Data Class, it should be correct configured the ObjectMapper. In this case, it is working ok with a ParameterNamesModule configuration, and setting visibility of Fields and Creator Methods

    om.registerModule(new ParameterNamesModule());
    om.setVisibility(FIELD, JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.ANY);
    om.setVisibility(CREATOR, JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.ANY);

Then it should work as expected.




回答11:


I was having issues with getting Lombok to not add the ConstructorProperies annotation so went the other way and disabled Jackson from looking at that annotation.

The culprit is JacksonAnnotationIntrospector.findCreatorAnnotation. Notice:

if (_cfgConstructorPropertiesImpliesCreator
            && config.isEnabled(MapperFeature.INFER_CREATOR_FROM_CONSTRUCTOR_PROPERTIES)

Also notice JacksonAnnotationIntrospector.setConstructorPropertiesImpliesCreator:

public JacksonAnnotationIntrospector setConstructorPropertiesImpliesCreator(boolean b)
{
    _cfgConstructorPropertiesImpliesCreator = b;
    return this;
}

So two options, either set the MapperFeature.INFER_CREATOR_FROM_CONSTRUCTOR_PROPERTIES to false or create a JacksonAnnotationIntrospector set setConstructorPropertiesImpliesCreator to false and set this AnnotationIntrospector into the ObjectMapper via ObjectMapper.setAnnotationIntrospector.

Notice a couple things, I am using Jackson 2.8.10 and in that version MapperFeature.INFER_CREATOR_FROM_CONSTRUCTOR_PROPERTIES does not exist. I am not sure in which version of Jackson it was added. So if it is not there, use the JacksonAnnotationIntrospector.setConstructorPropertiesImpliesCreator mechanism.




回答12:


I struggled with this for a moment as well. But looking through the documentation here I can see that the onConstructor annotation parameter is considered experimental and is not supported well on my IDE (STS 4). According to the Jackson documentation, private members are not (de)serialized by default. There are quick ways to resolve this.

Add JsonAutoDetect annotation and set it appropriately to detect protected/private members. This is convenient for DTOs

@JsonAutoDetect(fieldVisibility = JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.ANY)
public class SomeClass

Add a factory function with @JsonCreator annotation, this works best if you need some object validation or additional transforms.

public class SomeClass {

   // some code here

   @JsonCreator
   public static SomeClass factory(/* params here dressing them in @JsonProperty annotations*/) {
      return new SomeClass();
   }
}

Of course you could just manually add the constructor in yourself also as well.




回答13:


From Jan Rieke's Answer

Since lombok 1.18.4, you can configure what annotations are copied to the constructor parameters. Insert this into your lombok.config:

lombok.copyableAnnotations += com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonProperty

Then just add @JsonProperty to your fields:

...

You'll need a @JsonProperty on every field even if the name matches, but that is a good practice to follow anyway. You can also set your fields to public final using this, which I prefer over getters.

@ToString
@EqualsAndHashCode
@Wither
@AllArgsConstructor(onConstructor=@__(@JsonCreator))
public class TestFoo {
    @JsonProperty("xoom")
    private final String x;
    @JsonProperty("z")
    private final int z;
}



回答14:


Try adding a @NoArgsConstructor




回答15:


I had a different issue and it was with the boolean primitive types.

private boolean isAggregate;

It was throwing the following error as a result

Exception: Unrecognized field "isAggregate" (class 

Lambok converts isAggregate to isAggregate() as a getter making the property internally to lombok as aggregate instead isAggregate. The Jackson library doesn't like it and it needs isAggregate property instead.

I updated the primitive boolean to Wrapper Boolean to work around this issue. There are other options for you if you are dealing with boolean types, see the reference below.

Sol:

private Boolean isAggregate;

ref: https://www.baeldung.com/lombok-getter-boolean



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/39381474/cant-make-jackson-and-lombok-work-together

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!