Comparing two numpy arrays for equality, element-wise

匿名 (未验证) 提交于 2019-12-03 01:47:02

问题:

What is the simplest way to compare two numpy arrays for equality (where equality is defined as: A = B iff for all indices i: )?

Simply using == gives me a boolean array:

 >>> numpy.array([1,1,1]) == numpy.array([1,1,1])  array([ True,  True,  True], dtype=bool) 

Do I have to and the elements of this array to determine if the arrays are equal, or is there a simpler way to compare?

回答1:

(A==B).all() 

test if all values of array (A==B) are True.

Edit (from dbaupp's answer and yoavram's comment)

It should be noted that:

  • this solution can have a strange behavior in a particular case: if either A or B is empty and the other one contains a single element, then it return True. For some reason, the comparison A==B returns an empty array, for which the all operator returns True.
  • Another risk is if A and B don't have the same shape and aren't broadcastable, then this approach will raise an error.

In conclusion, the solution I proposed is the standard one, I think, but if you have a doubt about A and B shape or simply want to be safe: use one of the specialized functions:

np.array_equal(A,B)  # test if same shape, same elements values np.array_equiv(A,B)  # test if broadcastable shape, same elements values np.allclose(A,B,...) # test if same shape, elements have close enough values 


回答2:

The (A==B).all() solution is very neat, but there are some built-in functions for this task. Namely array_equal, allclose and array_equiv.

(Although, some quick testing with timeit seems to indicate that the (A==B).all() method is the fastest, which is a little peculiar, given it has to allocate a whole new array.)



回答3:

Let's measure the performance by using the following piece of code.

import numpy as np import time  exec_time0 = [] exec_time1 = [] exec_time2 = []  sizeOfArray = 5000 numOfIterations = 200  for i in xrange(numOfIterations):      A = np.random.randint(0,255,(sizeOfArray,sizeOfArray))     B = np.random.randint(0,255,(sizeOfArray,sizeOfArray))      a = time.clock()      res = (A==B).all()     b = time.clock()     exec_time0.append( b - a )      a = time.clock()      res = np.array_equal(A,B)     b = time.clock()     exec_time1.append( b - a )      a = time.clock()      res = np.array_equiv(A,B)     b = time.clock()     exec_time2.append( b - a )  print 'Method: (A==B).all(),       ', np.mean(exec_time0) print 'Method: np.array_equal(A,B),', np.mean(exec_time1) print 'Method: np.array_equiv(A,B),', np.mean(exec_time2) 

Output

Method: (A==B).all(),        0.03031857 Method: np.array_equal(A,B), 0.030025185 Method: np.array_equiv(A,B), 0.030141515 

According to the results above, the numpy methods seem to be faster than the combination of the == operator and the all() method and by comparing the numpy methods the fastest one seems to be the numpy.array_equal method.



回答4:

If you want to check if two arrays have the same shape AND elements you should use np.array_equal as it is the method recommended in the documentation.

Performance-wise don't expect that any equality check will beat another, as there is not much room to optimize comparing two elements. Just for the sake, i still did some tests.

import numpy as np import timeit  A = np.zeros((300, 300, 3)) B = np.zeros((300, 300, 3)) C = np.ones((300, 300, 3))  timeit.timeit(stmt='(A==B).all()', setup='from __main__ import A, B', number=10**5) timeit.timeit(stmt='np.array_equal(A, B)', setup='from __main__ import A, B, np', number=10**5) timeit.timeit(stmt='np.array_equiv(A, B)', setup='from __main__ import A, B, np', number=10**5) > 51.5094 > 52.555 > 52.761 

So pretty much equal, no need to talk about the speed.

The (A==B).all() behaves pretty much as the following code snippet:

x = [1,2,3] y = [1,2,3] print all([True if x[i]==y[i] else False for i in range(len(x))]) > True 


标签
易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!