release

I've a little C# program here that produces different output between the Debug and Release versions. The empty output from the Release version is, I think, consistent with the C# Language Specification. This program should not produce output, yet the Debug version does. I've run both the Release and Debug versions from the command line (outside the VS environment) and get the same inconsistent output. I've decompiled the Debug version (using ILDASM) and then re-compiled it with ILASM. When I do this, the newly compiled program behaves just like the Release version. I can only imagine that when

I'm working on a flashlight app using the camera flash. It seems to work fine but on occasion calling camera.release() causes a hang for about a minute or so. I've included the code below. I've looked at a bunch of examples and I don't see anything that could cause such a thing. Any ideas? //latest public void setOn(boolean on, Context context) { if (lock) { Log.i(TAG, "lock: true"); return; } if (on) { if (mCamera == null) { mCamera = Camera.open(); } Parameters params = mCamera.getParameters(); params.setFlashMode(MODE_TORCH); mCamera.setParameters(params); mCamera.startPreview(); } else {

I work on SAM9G25 EK board with buildroot and Armstrong linux (Linux4sam). My script is creating linux version "2.6.39+" and this "+" is confusing (/lib/modules folder etc.). I want to remove it. I found only two files .uImage.cmd, and kernel.release that contains this string, but both are generated. Where is this string created ? You have a .config ? Look in there for the value assigned to CONFIG_LOCALVERSION . To have no local version specifed in the kernel's release, either remove CONFIG_LOCALVERSION or comment it out by starting the line containing it by a # . The default shall be: #CONFIG

What's the difference between the two? If I do Mutex.Close() instead of Mutex.Release() when shutting down my app, what would be the side effect? ReleaseMutex is used to allow another thread to obtain the mutex. It should only be called if you have acquired the mutex (called WaitOne and acquired it or acquired through the constructor). Important Note ReleaseMutex will throw an exception if you have not acquired the mutex. Close is used to clean up the resources that have been allocated by declaring the mutex object, whether you ever blocked on it or not, if you have acquired the mutex it will

I have read in other discussions that Release dlls have reduced size compared to Debug dlls. But why is it that the size of the dll I have made is the other way around: the Release dll is bigger than the Debug dll. Will it cause problems? It won't cause problems, its probably that the compiler is 'inlining' more items in the release build and creating larger code. It all depends on the code itself. Nothing to worry about. EDIT: If you are really worried about and not worried about speed you can turn on optimize for size. Or turn off auto inlining and see what difference you get. EDIT: More

I am currently trying to figure out, how to do release management with git flow in a scenario where I have one git repository with about 15 projects in two solutions plus scripts for the database. Each solution basically contains one project that will result in an executable and more than 10 projects containing base functionality used by both solutions like DAL, SAP access wrapper etc. Solution one is an application with UI for the users. Solution two is a Windows service. The release of the two solutions and the database are not in sync. This means that frequently only one ore two of the

今天通过SVN查看Spring源码时在tags目录下发现有不同版本的文件夹，如v3.2.0.M1，v3.2.0.RC1，v3.2.0.RELEASE，然后我就产生了这些版本都代表什么含义的疑问。 1. M版本，网上没太多资料，不过在《Spring技术内幕-深入解析Spring架构与设计原理》一书中，作者提过这是“基线版本”，代表着开发的里程碑。 2. RC版本， RC：(Release　Candidate) Candidate是候选人的意思，用在 软件 上就是候选版本。Release是发行、发布的意思。Release.Candidate.就是发行候选版本。和Beta版最大的差别在于Beta阶段会一直加入新的功能，但是到了RC版本，几乎就不会加入新的功能了，而主要着重于除错! 3. RELEASE版本，最终版本，运行很稳定的版本，基本上不会有改动。 4. alpha、beta、gamma版本， 广义上对测试有三个传统的称呼：alpha、beta、gamma，用来标识测试的阶段和范围。alpha 是指内测，即现在说的CB，指开发团队内部测试的版本或者有限 用户体验测试 版本。beta 是指公测，即针对所有用户公开的测试版本。然后做过一些修改，成为正式发布的候选版本时叫做gamma，现在叫做RC（Release Candidate）。 来源： oschina 链接： https://my

I have activated proguard in my project since I am trying to release this on Google Play. Even though proguard-android.txt has -keepclassmembers class **.R$* { public static <fields>; } which means it should not obfuscate the R.raw class that I need, I find that when running this code import headwayEnt.Blackhole_Darksun.R; private static final String RES_PATH = "headwayEnt.Blackhole_Darksun.R"; public static int getFileHandle(String fileName, String path) { String fullPath = RES_PATH + '$' + path; if (subClass == null) { Class<headwayEnt.Blackhole_Darksun.R> c = null; try { c = (Class<R>)Class