release

I wonder if there are some good practices for testing multiple configurations in Hudson. We compile tests in debug and release mode and also toggle MPI on and off. The make system takes a series of parameters (DEBUG=FALSE, OPT=TRUE, MPI=TRUE) and does the right thing, producing test executables that are well labeled. I could probably create a monolithic control script that does everything, but I wonder if I am missing some facility for iterating through a list of parameters. Even better would be if I could clean the project in between. Anyone have an opinion? Is this best done with separate

I use the PyQt python binding of Qt C++ for creation of the GUI of my program. If I were to distribute/release the program as a simple executable, preferably for several common platforms, how should I do this the 'right' way? Currently Qt and PyQt are installed in my environment, but I don't want any users to go through the process of installing these. I want my program to be a click-run solution. Having a hard time wrapping my head around how the Qt C++ library code and PyQt will be included locally in my project. I am not very familiar yet with python program releases. I have noticed there

So I am fairly new MVC4 and many patterns are new to me. However the one thing I am curious about is best practice about release/debug modes. There are a bunch of things for me that differ between live and debug mode and I would like for all of them to be automatic so I don't need to change anything to publish. So for instance I have done like this in my repo (domain project) public class EFAccountRepository : IAccountRepository { private EFDbContext _context; public EFAccountRepository() { #if DEBUG _context = new EFDbContext("name=Debug"); #else _context = new EFDbContext("name=Live");

I am using Firebase Authentication for authenticating user in my application. Everything was working fine till I was working on debug build of my application. But the moment I have uploaded the signed apk in playstore, my user authentication service always fails with "Developer Error" message. On some web research, I find out that I need to generate SHA certificate for my signed apk also. I have generated SHA with locally created ".jks" file, which I have used to sign my application locally before uploading. I have added the generated SHA keys to firebase project console and generated new

I've been dropping by Stack Overflow for a few years now via Google, but haven't asked/answered anything as of yet, so here goes. Basically I have a 3D rendering framework set up drawing models and terrain in DirectX 11. Everything works fine, with no problems when running either Debug or Release builds through Visual Studio 2010. However, when I navigate into my folders and run the executables independantly, only the Debug build works. The Release build displays whatever clear colour I have set, but no geometry, although the framerate looks as though it's running, and my mouse is locked to

With NSZombieEnabled turned on it will provide some guard against the EXC_BAD_ACCESS issues happening at runtime. I am doing dual-diligence to make sure no/little memory leaks, but I might over releasing so having NSZombieEnabled turned on would help prevent that, am I right? Or with NSZombieEnabled turned on, would all memory releasing operations be translated into no-op? It'll be a big problem is that's the case. No, you should not ship with NSZombiesEnable . Zombies work by casting the isa pointer of deallocated objects to a "zombie" class. The storage for this object is not freed unless

what does RELEASE_SAFELY or RELEASE_CF_SAFELY mean? Ok, it's for releasing objects but why not use [obj release] ? Besides I tried to use it in xcode 4 but I am running into buid errors: Undefined symbols for architecture i386: "_RELEASE_SAFELY", referenced from: -[AdressBookModel search:] in AdressBookModel.o ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture i386 collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Can I do just [obj release] instead? What would you consider? RELEASE_SAFELY is not a function but a macro and is usually defined like this: #define RELEASE_SAFELY(__POINTER) { [__POINTER release]; _

When we do a release, both the release artifact and tag are being created as expected. However, the project isn't properly updated to the next (snapshot) version. An example configuration for the release: The relevant part of the console log: [RELEASE] Committing release version on branch 'master' [RELEASE] Creating tag '1.3.14' [RELEASE] Pushing branch 'master' to 'ssh://git@git.cloudbees.com/xxx/yyy.git' [RELEASE] Pushing tag '1.3.14' to 'ssh://git@git.cloudbees.com/xxx/yyy.git' [RELEASE] Changing POMs to next development version [RELEASE] Committing next development version on branch

I created a maven project and i'm trying to run an external script. In this external script, i use read command to ask a question and get an answer. It works if i do a sudo mvn package with exec-maven-plugin But, but, but : If i do a sudo mvn package , my script doesn't stop at read command. If i do a sudo mvn release:prepare with exec-maven-plugin, my script doesn't stop at read command. If i do a sudo mvn release:prepare with maven-antrun-plugin, my script doesn't stop at read command. And obviously, i need to do a release :) I tried to to change the first line of my script (#/usr/bin/bash,