merge-conflict-resolution

`git stash` during a merge conflict

由 ▼魔方 西西 提交于 2019-12-03 06:44:25
问题 We've done something bad. We ran git stash save during a merge conflict, and now we can't restore our work. Things we've tried: git pull -Xours origin master git stash apply --index And: git pull origin master git stash save --keep-index "merge conflicts" git stash apply stash@{1} Please help! 回答1: The issue seems to be that git stash doesn't save a reference to the branch you were trying to merge in. During a merge, this is stored in a ref named MERGE_HEAD . To fix it and get back to your

Git merging hotfix to multiple branches

由 ぃ、小莉子 提交于 2019-12-03 05:45:53
问题 I've been trying to wrap my head around git branching models. I've been looking at http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/ for some ideas and coming from Subversion one thing I was really looking forward to was making a change in a single place and merging it to all the branches that needed it. In Subversion, we ended up doing to much copy of code around. However I still don't get this completely. Here is a standard type of workflow that I have and it will always come up with

How resolve this Mercurial conflict?

由 送分小仙女□ 提交于 2019-12-03 05:13:40
问题 I'm frustrated with Mercurial and Python since it makes easy things difficult. I have a trivial conflict and since Mercurial does not give any suggestion what to do I don't know even how to resolve this trivial file conflict: The conflict is trivial but if I can't resolve this I can't resolve anything complicated either. Can I just edit the file to a way I want and commit it again from anywhere? Should I run hg merge ? Why can't Mercurial even let me choose a version to keep? Why is something

conflicts prevention while merging branches in Subversion

由 孤者浪人 提交于 2019-12-03 03:21:32
问题 I have recently observed a very weird merge conflict in Subversion. I am using tortoise SVN as the client. Please find the below information of the Trunk and branch details: \trunk\ . Two users are working on this. \QA\ is the branch where the merges from the trunk will happen. For simplicity sake, There is a visual studio solution in \trunk\ClassLibrary1.sln There is currently a sample project in the solution. \trunk\ClassLibrary1 Both users are fully updated and dont have any working copy

Cannot Merge due to conflict with UserInterfaceState.xcuserstate

由 血红的双手。 提交于 2019-12-03 02:32:42
I created a branch and made a bunch of changes. I committed the changes and then archived the changes. Then I switched to the master branch and tried to do a merge. It said I had uncommitted changes. So I did a commit on the master branch to see what it was talking about. It said that there is a file called UserInterfaceState.xcuserstate that was modified. So I committed the change (not sure what the change was). Then I tried to merge again. It then opens up a merge window and indicates that there is a conflict with UserInterfaceState.xcuserstate. So I went back to the branch and found that

How to ignore merge conflict?

由 一笑奈何 提交于 2019-12-02 23:35:04
问题 I have next merge conflict: <<<<<<< Updated upstream my( $c, $name ) = (shift,shift); my %name = defined $name ? ( name => $name ) : (); ||||||| merged common ancestors my( $c ) = shift; ======= my( $c, $name ) = (shift,shift); my %name = defined $name ? ( name => $name ) : (); >>>>>>> Stashed changes <<<<<<< Updated upstream return $c->render_to_string( 'control/toggle', id => "toggle$id", %name, @_ ); ||||||| merged common ancestors return $c->render_to_string( 'control/toggle', @_, id =>

Telling git to follow moved content (not simply moved files)

由 白昼怎懂夜的黑 提交于 2019-12-02 23:30:15
While refactoring source code, sometimes you need to move big blocks of text inside a file, or even to a new file. You create a branch refactored and commit away: $git checkout master $git branch refactored $git checkout refactored <move code around> $git commit -m "refactored code" However, people may commit on top of the old pre-refactor branch, changing the code that was moved: $git checkout master <change code that was moved elsewhere on branch refactored> $git commit -m "bugfix" On branch refactored , you then want to incorporate changes made in master : $git checkout refactored $git

`git stash` during a merge conflict

由 ぐ巨炮叔叔 提交于 2019-12-02 20:23:33
We've done something bad. We ran git stash save during a merge conflict, and now we can't restore our work. Things we've tried: git pull -Xours origin master git stash apply --index And: git pull origin master git stash save --keep-index "merge conflicts" git stash apply stash@{1} Please help! The issue seems to be that git stash doesn't save a reference to the branch you were trying to merge in. During a merge, this is stored in a ref named MERGE_HEAD . To fix it and get back to your previous state, you need to find the revision (let's pretend it's d7a9884a380f81b2fbf002442ee9c9eaf34ff68d)

git: merge conflicts over newline at end of file

由 北慕城南 提交于 2019-12-02 19:39:31
问题 I often get conflicts while pulling (merging) in git over differences in newlines at the end of the file. The conflict comes out looking like this: diff --cc httpdocs/about/faq.php index 0ae3963,b5eb519..0000000 --- a/httpdocs/about/faq.php +++ b/httpdocs/about/faq.php @@@ -212,4 -211,4 +212,8 @@@ $_SESSION['activePage'] = 'about' </div><!-- end wrap --> -<?php require RESOURCE_PATH."page_elements".SLASH."footer.php"; ?> ++<<<<<<< HEAD +<?php require RESOURCE_PATH."page_elements".SLASH.

How resolve this Mercurial conflict?

由 半世苍凉 提交于 2019-12-02 18:29:49
I'm frustrated with Mercurial and Python since it makes easy things difficult. I have a trivial conflict and since Mercurial does not give any suggestion what to do I don't know even how to resolve this trivial file conflict: The conflict is trivial but if I can't resolve this I can't resolve anything complicated either. Can I just edit the file to a way I want and commit it again from anywhere? Should I run hg merge ? Why can't Mercurial even let me choose a version to keep? Why is something trivial near impossible to do without digging through 1000 poorly written manpages? Martin Geisler You
订阅 merge-conflict-resolution